| Car Giant v QPR 09:59 - Oct 22 with 3048 views | YorkRanger |
There is a piece on p4 of the FT today for those interested. Doesn't add much to the debate, but does make an interesting point in relation to the unlikelihood of success of a compulsory purcahse order against Car Giant |  | | |  |
| Car Giant v QPR on 10:21 - Oct 22 with 2980 views | sexton |
Spackman! |  | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 11:39 - Oct 22 with 2841 views | YorkRanger |
| Car Giant v QPR on 10:21 - Oct 22 by sexton |
Spackman! |
Apologies | | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 14:28 - Oct 22 with 2638 views | themodfather |
all i wished was qpr just SHUT UP until the land was secured and planning permission granted, then tell me.
we have years of this now.....maybe high court cases= more money
and on and on.. |  | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 19:04 - Oct 22 with 2408 views | themodfather |
also i thought the ground was going to the side of car giant..?? their site is part of plans for the new homes
or am i wrong.... | | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 20:40 - Oct 22 with 2255 views | MedwayR |
| Car Giant v QPR on 19:04 - Oct 22 by themodfather |
also i thought the ground was going to the side of car giant..?? their site is part of plans for the new homes
or am i wrong.... |
CarGiant own a lot of the land at Old Oak Common, not just the site they're currently occupying. |  |
| |
| Car Giant v QPR on 11:46 - Oct 23 with 2045 views | daveB |
end of the article is interesting and something I've never understood which is if Car Giant won't sell then why not just build it somewhere els e in the area, I'm guessing it's due to the transport links |  | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:25 - Oct 23 with 1995 views | YorkRanger |
| Car Giant v QPR on 11:46 - Oct 23 by daveB |
end of the article is interesting and something I've never understood which is if Car Giant won't sell then why not just build it somewhere els e in the area, I'm guessing it's due to the transport links |
Personally I think there is a lot of commercial posturing at the moment. At the right price I'm sure a deal is still doable. I do think, however, that QPR have underestimated Car Giant and ultimately that could have a major impact on the price of the land. Do Car Giant really want to deviate from their core business and start building on land - it will take a mass of capital and there are many risk factors at play.
Lots of legs in this one yet... | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:37 - Oct 23 with 1966 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:25 - Oct 23 by YorkRanger |
Personally I think there is a lot of commercial posturing at the moment. At the right price I'm sure a deal is still doable. I do think, however, that QPR have underestimated Car Giant and ultimately that could have a major impact on the price of the land. Do Car Giant really want to deviate from their core business and start building on land - it will take a mass of capital and there are many risk factors at play.
Lots of legs in this one yet... |
i'm sure you're right.
meat and potatoes to tone. |  |
| |
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:40 - Oct 23 with 1961 views | WestminsteRs |
Any relation to 'Christer'? Or 'Farm'? |  | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:50 - Oct 23 with 1933 views | ElHoop |
“Old Oak has the potential to become the Stratford of the west. But a football stadium on Cargiant’s land will not make it a friendly place.”
Er....doesn't Stratford have a stadium???? |  | | |
| Car Giant v QPR on 12:54 - Oct 23 with 1922 views | PinnerPaul |
| Car Giant v QPR on 11:46 - Oct 23 by daveB |
end of the article is interesting and something I've never understood which is if Car Giant won't sell then why not just build it somewhere els e in the area, I'm guessing it's due to the transport links |
I don't think that's feasible, given the amount of land CG own.
Clive looked it up a few months ago, and they actually own additional land/buildings that they are not currently using I believe. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
