| MOTM? 17:30 - Feb 6 with 2654 views | HantsR |
Many shouts for Barbet and of course the usual suspects, Dieng and Dickie and I don't disagree, but I thought that the team as a whole was MOTM if that makes sense? as there were few poor performances today. Well done everyone. |  | | |  |
| MOTM? on 17:36 - Feb 6 with 2606 views | Gloucs_R |
Not sure Ball and Dykes had good games.
The back three looked solid.
Chair was my motm comfortably. |  |
| |
| MOTM? on 17:38 - Feb 6 with 2569 views | davman |
Say it quietly...
Wallace for me.
Barbet, Seny, Johansen and Dickie honourable mentions... |  |
| |
| MOTM? on 17:39 - Feb 6 with 2558 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Barbet, even without the goal. |  |
| |
| MOTM? on 17:41 - Feb 6 with 2527 views | joolsyp |
I've been very critical of Cameron and Wallace recently but both had good games. Positionally Wallace is miles ahead of Nico (which you'd expect given his experience) - shame he's so slow!
Barbet MoM for me. |  | | |
| MOTM? on 17:48 - Feb 6 with 2463 views | Malintabuk |
Said on the thread Barbet and stand by that
There is light years difference in a year with that defence.... so is it actually Dieng that as made the difference or Dickie?
But Barbet today looked in total control and made some really good decisions.....though the block of the season must go to Dickie |  | | |
| MOTM? on 17:53 - Feb 6 with 2419 views | LongsufferingR |
Barbet definitely with Dickie and Dieng close behind. Ball was sailing a bit close to the wind for periods of that game and with 10 men it would have been very difficult especially when their bigger names came on. Johansen is quietly getting on with exactly the things we bought him for and the 5 minute trudge off the pitch when he was subbed was the sign of a true shthouse. |  | | |
| MOTM? on 18:01 - Feb 6 with 2374 views | A40Bosh |
I am wondering whether we get to the stage now that with Seny, because he is proving to be a good keeper and more important, consistent, there is less need to appoint him MOTM when he has a good game.
Like a few it would be easier to just award it to the back 6 as a whole because there were a few squeaky bum moments today and between them they kept a clean sheet. Have to also say that Rob Dickie really is a great young defender and Barbet in the last few matches is overcoming his previous rep with many of us.
Not a day for Charlie and Lyndon today in terms of them terrorizing the defence, but it was more a grind it out result today and a result that should renew some confidence with a goal and win together with a clean sheet at home. |  |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:11 - Feb 6 with 2318 views | qpr_1968 |
was anyone suprised that ball wasnt subbed, obviously right choice in the end, but would it have made a difference if he was. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| MOTM? on 18:15 - Feb 6 with 2289 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| MOTM? on 18:11 - Feb 6 by qpr_1968 |
was anyone suprised that ball wasnt subbed, obviously right choice in the end, but would it have made a difference if he was. |
Brave to leave him on, but he was playing well at that stage and never looked like picking up another yellow. plus we needed two defensive mids and we needed Bettache for the tiring Johansen. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:15 - Feb 6 with 2286 views | QPR_John |
Wonder what would have happened last season if we had had Dieng and Dickie in defence. Of corse we could have had Dieng in goal. No change of manager so what did Warburton not see in Dieng last season [Post edited 6 Feb 2021 18:17]
| | | |
| MOTM? on 18:17 - Feb 6 with 2262 views | qpr_1968 |
| MOTM? on 18:15 - Feb 6 by BrianMcCarthy |
Brave to leave him on, but he was playing well at that stage and never looked like picking up another yellow. plus we needed two defensive mids and we needed Bettache for the tiring Johansen. |
nice one, glad for bettache, always liked him when i watched the u23's. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:18 - Feb 6 with 2253 views | Boston |
Dickie has surpassed Chair as my favourite. Today, hmm, Barbet for the goal or Dickie for the block. Spins the coin, it’s Yoann. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:21 - Feb 6 with 2228 views | Northernr |
Barbet. |  | | |
| MOTM? on 18:23 - Feb 6 with 2213 views | Boston |
...he’s a doll, isn’t he? | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:25 - Feb 6 with 2188 views | Northernr |
| MOTM? on 18:23 - Feb 6 by Boston |
...he’s a doll, isn’t he? |
You can brush his hair, undress him everywhere. | | | |
| MOTM? on 18:32 - Feb 6 with 2138 views | dm97 |
Barbet - a more natural LCB in a three you will not see |  | | |
| MOTM? on 18:35 - Feb 6 with 2125 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| MOTM? on 18:32 - Feb 6 by dm97 |
Barbet - a more natural LCB in a three you will not see |
I feel like that's really a poem in some ancient Japanese form:
Barbet
A more natural LCB
In a Three
You will not
See. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:38 - Feb 6 with 2109 views | dm97 |
| MOTM? on 18:35 - Feb 6 by BrianMcCarthy |
I feel like that's really a poem in some ancient Japanese form:
Barbet
A more natural LCB
In a Three
You will not
See. |
QPR related haiku’s - a lockdown project | | | |
| MOTM? on 18:39 - Feb 6 with 2101 views | dm97 |
P.S honourable mention to Seny (everyone look at seny etc) the guy is a joke and we must treasure him | | | |
| MOTM? on 18:42 - Feb 6 with 2085 views | W7Ranger |
| MOTM? on 18:15 - Feb 6 by QPR_John |
Wonder what would have happened last season if we had had Dieng and Dickie in defence. Of corse we could have had Dieng in goal. No change of manager so what did Warburton not see in Dieng last season [Post edited 6 Feb 2021 18:17]
|
But who's to say that Warbs done the right thing by loaning him out to make him the keeper he is now?
Dieng in front of fans a year/18 months ago might have been too early for him and he might've struggled.
So maybe his situation has been managed brilliantly by Warbs to get him to where he's at now, which is a very composed and very good goalkeeper, [Post edited 6 Feb 2021 18:51]
|  | | |
| MOTM? on 18:43 - Feb 6 with 2078 views | qpr_1968 |
not much mention of kane today, how did he perform compared to midweek.
solid? | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:48 - Feb 6 with 2044 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| MOTM? on 18:43 - Feb 6 by qpr_1968 |
not much mention of kane today, how did he perform compared to midweek.
solid? |
Solid is a good word. Armstrong, as we expected, played in behind Kane but it was Dickie who was detailed to pick him up, so no error or frailty or failure by Kane in any way. Clive pointed out that Kane was dropped deeper after HT to help out, which was true and a good spot. And it did help.
Going forward, he was naturally quieter. But we rarely had the same amount or quality of possession in the oppo half that would bring him into play. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:49 - Feb 6 with 2032 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| MOTM? on 18:42 - Feb 6 by W7Ranger |
But who's to say that Warbs done the right thing by loaning him out to make him the keeper he is now?
Dieng in front of fans a year/18 months ago might have been too early for him and he might've struggled.
So maybe his situation has been managed brilliantly by Warbs to get him to where he's at now, which is a very composed and very good goalkeeper, [Post edited 6 Feb 2021 18:51]
|
Very good point. I suppose we'll never know. I'd give Warburton the benefit of the doubt on this one. | |
| |
| MOTM? on 18:50 - Feb 6 with 2027 views | qpr_1968 |
| MOTM? on 18:48 - Feb 6 by BrianMcCarthy |
Solid is a good word. Armstrong, as we expected, played in behind Kane but it was Dickie who was detailed to pick him up, so no error or frailty or failure by Kane in any way. Clive pointed out that Kane was dropped deeper after HT to help out, which was true and a good spot. And it did help.
Going forward, he was naturally quieter. But we rarely had the same amount or quality of possession in the oppo half that would bring him into play. |
thanks again brian. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
