| New interpretation of the offside law 15:36 - Aug 3 with 1613 views | loftboy |
Players in an offside position may now be penalised even if they don't touch the ball if they have an adverse affect on the goal. Common sense At last. [Post edited 3 Aug 2015 15:40]
|  |
| |  |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 15:37 - Aug 3 with 1601 views | hopphoops |
 |  |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 15:38 - Aug 3 with 1600 views | Jigsore |
i'm all for equal rights and all but that seems a bit much really |  |
| “The thing about football - the important thing about football - is that it is not just about football.†|
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 15:39 - Aug 3 with 1595 views | pomanjou |
YE GODS! Commonsense at last, indeed. Is this official? Uk, European, Worldwide? |  |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 15:40 - Aug 3 with 1575 views | loftboy |
Bloody predictive text  | |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 16:35 - Aug 3 with 1470 views | daveB |
why can't they just make the rule black and white, far too much interpretation in this rule |  | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 16:42 - Aug 3 with 1433 views | Dorse |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 16:35 - Aug 3 by daveB |
why can't they just make the rule black and white, far too much interpretation in this rule |
Dave, you can't different rules for white players. It's racialist. [Post edited 3 Aug 2015 16:42]
|  |
| 'What do we want? We don't know! When do we want it? Now!' |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 16:58 - Aug 3 with 1391 views | QPR_John |
So they have interpreted the rule back to where it was before the last interpretation. |  | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:02 - Aug 3 with 1367 views | BerkoRanger |
If the interpretation of the ruling is in different languages, they'll need interpreters. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:05 - Aug 3 with 1358 views | QPR1882 |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 16:58 - Aug 3 by QPR_John |
So they have interpreted the rule back to where it was before the last interpretation. |
The new laws will only mean more arguments in pubs about players on or off side, interfering or not interfering. |  | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:08 - Aug 3 with 1343 views | Clive_Anderson |
I thought if for example you unsighted the keeper when in an offside position then it was already counted as offside even if you didn't touch the ball? How is this different? | | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:39 - Aug 3 with 1300 views | johncharles |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:05 - Aug 3 by QPR1882 |
The new laws will only mean more arguments in pubs about players on or off side, interfering or not interfering. |
The last outpost of blokes conversation. Arguing about the offside rule in a pub. |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:47 - Aug 3 with 1279 views | TacticalR |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:05 - Aug 3 by QPR1882 |
The new laws will only mean more arguments in pubs about players on or off side, interfering or not interfering. |
There is too much interfering in this country. |  |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:49 - Aug 3 with 1274 views | PunteR |
Confucius said "If a player isn't interfering with play than what is he doing on the pitch.?"
May have been Strachan.. |  |
| Occasional providers of half decent House music. |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:15 - Aug 3 with 1235 views | terryb |
I doubt that the laws have been changed at all.
Just the interpretation given to them by the referee's managers. Pinner will be able to tell us if this is so.
You have never had to touch the ball before offside was given. This was just what the commentators/analysts would have had you believe! | | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:19 - Aug 3 with 1225 views | johncharles |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 17:47 - Aug 3 by TacticalR |
There is too much interfering in this country. |
Is this the Edward Heath thread ? | |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:27 - Aug 3 with 1207 views | QPR_John |
But it seemed from last season if a player did not touch the ball he was deemed not to interfering with play and thus not given offside . I hope this new interpretation changes that. | | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:31 - Aug 3 with 1190 views | loftboy |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:15 - Aug 3 by terryb |
I doubt that the laws have been changed at all.
Just the interpretation given to them by the referee's managers. Pinner will be able to tell us if this is so.
You have never had to touch the ball before offside was given. This was just what the commentators/analysts would have had you believe! |
I didn't say the law had changed, on the sky sports Ap there lots of scenarios from last season including a couple of Austins where a referee now says whether the goal would stand this season or not. | |
| |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 18:36 - Aug 3 with 1183 views | terryb |
That was down to how Webb & the other idiot in charge of the referee's wanted them to act.
Anyone who heard Webb defend every decision made in the home game against City last season, will know he has no idea of how to use common sense in a match! | | | |
| New interpretation of the offside law on 19:56 - Aug 3 with 1070 views | HollowayRanger |
YOU missed article 4
article 4 all man utd chelski and arsenal player will not be deemed offside no matter where they stand
all players from small clubs will be deemed offside when player the above teams |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
