Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Jose Fonte Admits Money Is His Motivation !
Tuesday, 7th Mar 2017 09:58

It is very strange that Jose Fonte cannot seem to leave his past behind and concentrate on his new club, something that West am fans will not be too pleased to hear.

No one can deny that Jose Fonte was a great servant to Southampton Football Club for most of his seven years at the club but after his success for Portugal in the summer of 2016 something changed in him as a man, some would put that down to his change of agents to Jorges Mendes, but that is not the whole reason as Fonte is an adult who can make his own decisions and his decision as he has admitted seems to be solely money.

When he left the club for West Ham in January it put an end to a sorry six month ending to what had up until then been a great 6 1/2 years in the Saints defence, indeed there was no sign of Fonte having any discontent at St Mary's in October 2016 when he signed a new deal with the club keeping hi there till the summer of 2018 when he would be approaching his 35th birthday.

Speaking to the club's official website back then he said.

“I want to thank the manager, Les Reed, Ralph [Krueger], Katharina [Liebherr] — all of the staff and all of the board — for showing their trust and belief in me.

“I am extremely happy that they are giving me this opportunity to keep being in this great club, and I hope I can give back with good performances and by helping the club move forward.

“This is where I feel happy and where I’ve been very successful, so this is where I want to be and where I want to win.”

Contrast that to his protestations a year later and it is quite shocking how his attitude has changed so quickly.

But perhaps more shocking is the fact that Fonte can't seem to let the whole sorry affair pass quietly into history, something still seems to rile him and he can't seem to keep his mouth shut and his latest outburst in a clearly stage managed interview with Graeme Souness who asks him no difficult questions, does nothing for his own image and cannot sit easily with his new supporters at West Ham United.

In the interview on Sky TV Fonte starts off saying the right things.

"In the summer, there were a few offers, including West Ham. But in January they came back in and it was a no brainer for me because of the size of the club and the move to the Olympic Stadium."

"The passionate fans they have and also the ambition of the manager and the chairman. It was an easy descion to choose West Ham. London is also closer to my wife's side of the family - so provided her more help to raise the kids. Everything made sense and I'm extremely happy."

Very good Jose, although funny these things should only surface now when you have lived down here quite happily for the last 7 years and I'm sure that your wife can do with help raising the kids, after all it must be hard having to stay at home and work your fingers to the bone with only a footballers wage to get buy on.

But the bitterness soon comes out of Fonte as Souness asks the stage managed questions.

GS: You had a great European Championships and came back to Southampton - what happened next?

JF: I spoke to the club and said there could be possibilities [to move] and I would like the club to consider it.

GS: Seven years with the club shows you were a good servant. Did the club not get that? If someone is coming to you offering a better deal, then Southampton had to understand that you was in demand. I think you can't have enough experienced players in the dressing room - you won't have a successful team if you don't have people like yourself, good seasoned pros that put the lesser likes in the dressing room in their place before it becomes a problem.

JF: I appreciate what the club had done for me since day one but we all have to take care of our families. There were offers that came in that would take care of my family in ways that Southampton weren't willing to. It's a difficult situation.

"Did the club not get that" !

You have to ask what planet Souness is on here, what did the club not get ? If it was the fact that a man they considered a loyal employee and who they had looked after with a contract only 10 months earlier, one he was by his own admission extremely happy with and they had even offered him a better one, despite they were quite within their rights to insist he honoured the original ! NO the club did not get it .

But the stage managed interview reached a new low with Souness's next rhetorical question.

GS: The club want to portray you as a bad guy - that's the reality. You're the one that wanted to leave - you're the one that wanted to make all the demands. That's how it appears to someone who doesn't understand the game. Supporters out there will say Jose left us in the lurch as we lost Virgil [van Dijk] to injury and we were short in the cup final. But your conscience is completely clear of it?

JF: It's completely clear. When I see all over the news that I submitted a transfer request to leave the club - that's disappointing. That never happened. There was an interview from the club; from a press conference that I demanded to leave, which then the press took it as a transfer request and I wonder where is it?

As I said before, in the summer there were possibilities of leaving - that's normal, everyone fights for their own interests to get the best possible outcome for yourself. To say that I wrote an official transfer request to the club, that's a lie. And also that I refused to train and I wasn't being a good captain? That's a complete lie. I've always given my best to that club. That's the main thing the fans should know. My conscious is very clear.

This is perhaps the most sycophantic drivel I have ever heard from a football pundit.

Who is the bad guy hear ? it is not the club who have offered Fonte a new deal something they didn't want to do, whilst I appreciate that Fonte has to do his best for his family as he puts it, it is a two way thing, the club signed him to a big new deal less than a year ago at an age where his form might drop, the risk was with the club, why should they not expect him to honour that deal.

"Someone who doesn't understand the game" say Souness patronisingly, it is lucky for him that clearly millions don't because if we all did and saw what arrogant, egotistical self centred people the game has bred then we would turn our backs on it in our millions, Souness and Fonte are taking the proverbial here and admitting that to them at least the supporters mean nothing, the guy who has forked out £750 for a season ticket has no right to expect a man on an alleged £75 k a week contract to do anything than the best for his family.

We understand why he would want to do it, but we understand the game enough to know that a contract should be honoured, the average man in the street cannot just walk away from his contracted commitments just because it suits him best, Souness and Fonte are clearly out of touch with reality here.

Another strange thing is that I have never seen anywhere, in the media or otherwise that Fonte had refused to train, why then would he bring that up.

The subject of did he didn't he ? with regard to putting in a transfer request is strange, he has stopped short this time of accusing the club of lying, subtly he suggests that it was the media who took the clubs words and twisted them to the fact that he had asked for a transfer.

But the whole transfer request" issue seems to be about semantics, what actually constitutes a transfer request, as Fonte himself has stated he was making it quite clear to the club he wished to explore other options and asked them to consider it, in plain English that means "I want to move and will you let me" in all but putting it in writing with his signature to it it is a transfer request, here Fonte seems to have stepped back a few steps and is resisting taking on the club, perhaps because they have evidence about what ha and hasn't been communicated, but this doesn't rest easily with him and he clearly can't let matters rest.

Oh for those that don't understand the game if a player has not submitted a transfer request then he is seen as being sold against his wishes and he is entitled to any loyalty bonus payments in the remainder of a contract and in most cases a percentage of the transfer fee, there were probably a million reasons why Jose Fonte would not wish to officially hand in a transfer request all of them £'s.

From a fans perspective it's hard to see what Fonte has hoped to gain from this interview, it has put him in an even worse light than before and for many fans opened up the question of whether he refused to train or not, the only thing we now know is that for Jose Fonte there was only one motivation for being at Southampton Football Club and that was we were paying him more than he could get elsewhere, perhaps that is a little unfair over parts of his time at the club, but certainly during his last six months that was his motivation.

We perhaps should not have been surprised though, after all when he joined us from Crystal Palace in 2010, he was dropping down a division to the third tier of English football, there was a reason he was doing that and it wasn't he fancied a Tuesday night break at Hartlepool.

For West Ham fans there is now a conundrum, they have a player who has openly admitted that he is only at their club for one reason, that is because they can look after his family financially better than Saints or any other club because they were the highest bidder.

I hope for Fonte's sake that West Ham fans done understand the game any better than Souness and he think Saints fans do, other wise he could be in for a rough ride.

We thought that this was the end of this sorry saga when Fonte departed back in January, but for some reason, perhaps guilt, perhaps regret he can't seem to let it go.

Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



dirk_doone added 10:45 - Mar 7
Nick, are you ever going to give your hate campaign against Jose Fonte a rest? It went on for years when he was playing for us. You blamed him for every defeat and were desperate to get rid of him. You should be happy that he has finally gone after all those years.

Personally, I think he was one of the best central defenders and captains we ever had and he played more games for us than just about any other defender in the club's history. Let it be now, Nick. He's gone. Find another scapegoat if you really need one so badly.
-2

LordDZLucan added 10:47 - Mar 7
An unnecessary interview and a really poor one by Souness. I can only assume that he was paid by Fonte to do it. Fonte forced through the transfer for purely monetary reasons as he has admitted. I have it on very good authority that he knew he was leaving well before the January transfer window. It has nothing to do with the 'size of the club' as West Ham are currently no bigger than us and if they do become bigger than us by then Fonte will be long retired.
5

aceofthebase added 10:54 - Mar 7
Sure is a hate campaign, Yoshida watch yer back!

However I do believe that most of what you have written is correct.
2

highfield49 added 11:12 - Mar 7
I agree with Nick in as much as, what was the point of the contrived interview? Why would Sky want to air this sort of garbage, nothing to do with Spam pretending to be a big London club surely? Fonte seems to be still trying to justify himself and massage his inflated ego. I didn't see the interview but it really wouldn't have surprised me if he'd been wearing his precious medal and denying he was a Southampton player when he won it. Hopefully everyone can now move on, again.
5

simmo400 added 11:19 - Mar 7
I don't care how much the kiss the badge the motivation of any player / manager is money. As soon as the cheques get bigger there off. I don't blame them but cut the bullshit about kids schools wives what ever.
2

BaselSaint added 11:26 - Mar 7
I don`t think we should dwell on these things. The modern game is not very sentimental and loyalty has all but gone. We all felt betrayed; that a weasel like Souness drags it all up in inconsequential really. It`s just a wind-up I will ignore. The future and in particular the prospect of Caceres and VVD in the centre of our defence is much more interesting. With the addition of Gabbi we can at last be a proper rounded team and potentially one of the best Saints sides ever.
4

hammer added 12:11 - Mar 7
No one at west ham care's that much what his motivation was. We are more concerned that he's had an average start to his time with us. Get over the fact that one of your players left and dared to sign for us as opposed to the top 4.
1

bstokesaint added 12:19 - Mar 7
What an unnecessary interview. Why stir it all up again when we'd just moved on? This still seems like one of the most senseless moves in recent history. Jose had a brilliant career with us and from I gather the club bent over backwards to keep him, which they needn't have done for a player in his twilight years. I sense the "more dosh" story is a cover-up for something else. I've heard a couple of rumours and they'd make much more sense than this nonsense story. Either way, it is a shame and the club and player haven't done well from it whoever is to blame.
2

SanMarco added 12:38 - Mar 7
Maybe Fonte can't 'leave his past' behind but we sure as feck can. Why worry about it? It makes sense as a sideways move if he has got more money out of it and as hammer says he has hardly made a brilliant start. I have forgotten about him and quite frankly don't care that much. He was great for us but now he has gone, end of story. Good luck to him at West Ham and let's move on and look to the future.
6

SanMarco added 12:40 - Mar 7
Oh yes and as for Souness - Branfoot always takes the laurels as our worst ever manager but who better than bitter, twisted managerial failure Souness to take the silver medal...
1

ChannonFodder added 12:41 - Mar 7
@hammer: It's not the fact that he left, it was in the manner of his leaving. As a fan of another team, you probably wouldn't have seen all the stories about Jose allegedly 'poisoning the atmosphere' with arrogance and obstreperousness.

The way his and Saints' relationship disintegrated was sad, not least because he really was all set to become a bona fide club legend, two years away from a testimonial, probably given a coaching position. Yet he shat all over that goodwill for a slight pay rise at another mid-table club, after having his head turned by utterly false rumours of a big payday at a glamour club.

1

SaintBrock added 13:18 - Mar 7
Mine too!
0

BoondockSaint added 13:39 - Mar 7
So he left for a big payday at the end of his career. No surprise.

Club lack ambition by selling best two players year in year out. No surprise.

Nick slagging Jose instead of Les. No surprise.
-1

ItchenNorth added 14:00 - Mar 7
To be blunt: who cares, move on. I don't know why anyone is shocked by player antics or media coverage these days. Its not worth wasting column inches on or the social media venting it gets. It won't change anything !
2

SaintNick added 14:05 - Mar 7
Contradictory boondock

Best two players leave for a big pay day whatever their age. No Surprise

I have slagged off Les Reed when it has needed doing, including in January for his failure to land a central defender,
2

highfield49 added 14:11 - Mar 7
SanMarco, agreed Branfoot is the clear winner in the worst manager stakes and Souness is a worthy runner up candidate, but Steve Wigley certainly did his best to go one better than bronze. He did oversee a win against Pompey though so he probably merits a touch of compassion.
1

SanMarco added 14:30 - Mar 7
How is boondock contradictory? Jose leaving for a big payday and the club lacking ambition for selling best players are not logically contradictory statements. Could boondock be suggesting that Jose had watched and learned from all the other departures I wonder. If Lovren can do it after one year...

highfield - of course we musn't forget a certain dodgy character from Sandbanks for a place on the podium.
5

BoondockSaint added 19:36 - Mar 7
Hi Nick

I thought Les (or the board) needed slagging when he sold our best players to our competition.

Or when the summer window closed and we had not signed two strikers and a cb.

Or when in the first half of the season you could see the effect of not making those signings had on our play and position on the league table.

I just don't think you are as critical of Les as you were of Cortese.

All the best
3

Jesus_02 added 22:59 - Mar 7
The move made sense for everyone apart from the fans. Both Fonte and Les where planning on getting the cash in. £8m is a fair amount TBH. Unfortunately it backfired when VVD got injured. Its verry hard to imagine us not defending a wee bit better in the Cup Final if Fonte was there.

And Nick lets be honest, you do have a bit of a bromance with Les... all that sweet talk about soccernomics!
3


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

Knees-up Mother Brown #22 by wessex_exile

Southampton Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024