| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! 17:12 - Oct 24 with 2996 views | Davillin |
Note first: Please do read the entire article below before replying; and please do your best to keep U.K. politics out of the discussion. If you can, please keep it to the E.U.'s philosophy of taxing success, which I suggest rewards failure. Thanks. Also, you might want to look for who are getting rebates, and the amounts.
It's your hard-earned money.
[You might also want to read the three "Related Articles" linked.]
_____________
David Cameron: Britain Will Not Pay Extra £1.7bn for EU Budget
Visibly furious Prime Minister hits out at 'surprise' £1.7billion EU bill and speaks of anger at 'appalling' way Britain has been treated by European Commission
By Matthew Holehouse, Political Correspondent, and Peter Dominiczak, Political Editor
1:45PM BST 24 Oct 2014
David Cameron has said Britain will refuse to pay a “completely unacceptable” bill of £1.7billion to the European Union.
The Prime Minister hit out at the bill and spoke of his anger at the “appalling” way Britain has been treated by the European Commission.
He said that “it certainly doesn’t help” the chances of Britain remaining in the EU after an in-out referendum due to be held in 2017.
A visibly furious Mr Cameron said: “I'm not paying that bill on December 1. It is not going to happen.”
The UK was on Thursday ambushed with a demand from the European Commission for the extra money because Britain’s economy has performed better than other economies in Europe since 1995.
The surcharge - which would add almost a fifth to the UK's annual contribution of £8.6 billion - is intended to reflect Britain's better-than-expected economic performance relative to other EU states.
It results from an EU recalculation of national incomes dating back to 1995 and taking into account recent changes in the rules to include economic activities such as prostitution and illegal drugs.
Speaking in Brussels, Mr Cameron said: "This is completely unacceptable.
"It is an unacceptable way for this organisation to work - to suddenly present a bill like this for such a vast sum of money with so little time to pay it. And it is an unacceptable way to treat one of the biggest contributors to the European Union.
"It is an appalling way to behave. I am not paying that bill on December 1. If people think I am they have got another thing coming.
“This organisation shouldn't be surprised if it behaves in its way if its members say it has to change.”
Mr Cameron said that he found out about the bill on Thursday, but that Treasury officials were warned earlier this week.
He earlier interrupted a meeting of leaders at the European Council to tell José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, that he had "no idea" of the impact of the budget hike would have in Britain.
The Prime Minister said the issue would now be discussed at an emergency meeting of EU foreign ministers and Britain would challenge it "every way possible".
"The Prime Minister said to Barroso he had no idea of the impact that these things have - it's not just about public opinion, it's two billion euros," a Government source said.
"It is something we are seeking to challenge. It's rather a large amount of money. The first thing is to discover precisely what the basis for the increase is."
Prime Minister Renzi of Italy, which has also been hit by an invoice for increased payments, backed up Mr Cameron.
The Prime Minister held talks at the European Council summit in Brussels on Thursday night with Dutch counterpart Mark Rutte, who is facing a similar surcharge, on how they can challenge the demand for cash.
Preliminary figures seen by the Financial Times suggest that Britain is facing by far the biggest top-up, while the Netherlands is being asked for an extra €642 million (£506 million).
By contrast, Germany receives a rebate of €779 million (£614 million), France €1 billion (£788.7 million) and Poland €316 million (£249 million).
The demand was met with outrage by Eurosceptics.
John Redwood, the former Tory trade secretary, said Mr Cameron should refuse to pay - and should amend the law if necessary to make clear the UK regards the demand as "illegal and unacceptable".
Mr Redwood told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "This is a very large increase in tax on the British people, imposed retrospectively without their permission.
"It offends all our principles of natural justice and fair taxation. The British people are already paying too much tax and he last thing they intend to do is sent another £1.7 billion to the Commission so that they can behave in the way they just have overnight."
Patrick O'Flynn, a Ukip MEP, said: "The EU's budget surcharge is effectively asking UK taxpayers to fork out for the disaster of the Eurozone. Totally outrageous."
Mark Pritchard, a Conservative MP for The Wrekin, said: "The timing and content of the EU budget demand shows how inept Brussels is. Brussels needs to work with the UK Government, not work against it.
"Unless this behaviour changes, the EU referendum could be brought forward. Europe should not penalise the UK's economic success whilst rewarding France's economic failure."
The surcharge is due for payment on December 1 - just days after the Rochester and Strood vote on November 20.
Peter Bone, the Conservative MP for Wellingborough, said: "We are just being taken for a ride. We are paying more and more in and getting nothing in return.
"Roll on the referendum - this will just strengthen the resolve of the British public to get out of this superstate.
"They are trying to rub David Cameron's nose in the dirt for having the audacity to stand up and say freedom of movement is wrong."
Labour and the Liberal Democrats also said the demand was unacceptable.
Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, claimed the Prime Minister is likely to have known about the payment for "weeks".
He said: "It is unacceptable it’s just been sprung upon people in this way but I’ve got to say what has our Prime Minister been doing?
"I mean, how could he suddenly be surprised about this, surely the Treasury has known about this for weeks and weeks and weeks?"
Downing Street refused to be drawn on exactly when Mr Cameron learned of the demand for extra money, saying only that the commission had published the details in "recent days".
The Prime Minister's official spokesman said there now needed to be a political-level discussion by finance ministers "well ahead" of the due payment date on December 1.
"It is not acceptable to have a demand such as this seemingly presented as a technical adjustment. It requires detailed political discussion," the spokesman said.
Nigel Farage, the Ukip leader, said Britain would have no choice but to pay the money.
“Of course he will pay up," he said. "These are the rules, the contributions to the European Union was a very complex formula and part of it is a measurement of your GDP against everybody else’s. There’s nothing he can do."
Open Europe, the think tank, said it is open to Britain and Denmark to refuse to pay. However, this would likely result in legal action by the commission, fines and interest charges of 2.5 per cent a month.
Alternatively, Britain could seek for the sum to be deducted from future budget payments.
Mr Rutte said the bill was an "unpleasant surprise" and said his country would consider legal action.
The payment, described by officials as a “surcharge” follows a change to the way the EU calculates gross national income to include previous hidden service industries, including such prostitution and illegal drugs.
Britain, which has a large service sector, has had its national income revised upwards to reflect a higher pace of growth compared to other countries.
There is already a scheduled meeting of European finance ministers on Novermber 7. Brussels officials said that it would be "highly unlikely" to organise an emergency meeting, but the agenda of that meeting could be changed.
___________
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/11184760/David-Cameron-deman |  |
| |  |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 11:56 - Oct 25 with 993 views | reddythered |
Eh, feck the EU. Socialist experiment that is an utter joke. Harmonisation across so may disparate nations is a task only an idiot would claim is possible.
Go back to what it was originally intended to be, a trading block and nothing else.
Do find it ironic the EU want to adjust the money. Is that the same EU riddled with fraud, indeed at one point didn't have their accounts signed off for something like 15 years? That persecuted a whistleblower who revealed the large degree of fraud endemic in the system? |  |
| |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 13:25 - Oct 25 with 957 views | Flashberryjack |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 11:56 - Oct 25 by reddythered |
Eh, feck the EU. Socialist experiment that is an utter joke. Harmonisation across so may disparate nations is a task only an idiot would claim is possible.
Go back to what it was originally intended to be, a trading block and nothing else.
Do find it ironic the EU want to adjust the money. Is that the same EU riddled with fraud, indeed at one point didn't have their accounts signed off for something like 15 years? That persecuted a whistleblower who revealed the large degree of fraud endemic in the system? |
I may be wrong here...but to my knowledge the EU accounts still haven't been signed off to this day.
A gravy train that needs to be derailed IMO. |  |
| |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 13:41 - Oct 25 with 948 views | LeonisGod |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 09:37 - Oct 25 by Catullus |
Two things, no, 3 things,
1, how can they take into account the black economy? Just who exactly, knows how much value that has to our gdp? The government can't even get the tax right for legal workers, what chance of someone getting undeclared monies right? I'll be very interested to see how much the EU thinks Britain benefits from criminal activity, maybe all those illegal immigrants really are good for us!
2, why does anybody expect we should stick to the rules when most other countries flout whatever rules they don't like?
France has a particularly fine record for rule breaking, no doubt they'll be insisting we pay up as this benefits them to around 790 million.
3, people always hold Germany up as the leading light. A country who continue to flourish despite the financial crisis, yet they too are getting a rebate. Haven't they been booming up until recently?
Something stinks here. But then I am openly anti EU!! |
1. They take into account the figures the UK govt give them. It was the UK govt that revised our calcs to include the black economy (which is why they shouldn't be surprised by this). The UK govt gives them the figures. The EU calculations are done according to an algorithm agreed by all EU states (including the UK). Actually, in 2007 Blair's govt agreed to changes to this algorithm that has since left the UK worse off to the tune of £4 bn!
2. Specific examples? We do generally tend to play fair, agreed. We won't cave into to this though with out renegotiation at least the time frame and possibly the amount.
3. Not sure on that. Ours includes historical back charges to 2002. I'm not sure whether Germany has recalculated in the same way. They have also dropped off a bit recently. I believe UK has been strongest economy this year. Not sure without checking though. |  | | |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 14:44 - Oct 25 with 926 views | perchrockjack |
party politics should be set aside for this issue as we re all being mugged, whether you re a Green,commie or fascist. All of us | |
| |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 16:01 - Oct 25 with 908 views | Davillin |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 00:40 - Oct 25 by jackb |
tut tut, assuming makes an ass of many people
main point isn't about retroactivity, the change in accounting is just about the main factor |
[Please don’t call me names. I’m not allowed to reciprocate in kind, or your ears would be ringing like the Bells of Saint Oudoceus and your balls shrivelling up like dried prunes.]
Here are some of the lines you might have seen if you had read the article [emphasis added]:
1. “The UK was on Thursday ambushed with a demand from the European Commission for the extra money because Britain’s economy has performed better than other economies in Europe since 1995.
”The surcharge * - which would add almost a fifth to the UK's annual contribution of £8.6 billion - is intended to reflect Britain's better-than-expected economic performance relative to other EU states.
”It results from an EU recalculation of national incomes dating back to 1995 and taking into account recent changes in the rules ‡ to include economic activities such as prostitution and illegal drugs.]“
* A “surcharge” is an extra charge, or penalty, over and above the regular charge, usually to punish an error in reporting or paying.
‡ A change in rules which applies retroactively is called ex post facto and is unconscionable, if not illegal.
2. “Patrick O'Flynn, a Ukip MEP, said: "The EU's budget surcharge is effectively asking UK taxpayers to fork out for the disaster of the Eurozone.” [Note: As an MEP, he is in a position to know.]
3. “’It is not acceptable to have a demand such as this seemingly presented as a technical adjustment. It requires detailed political discussion,’ the spokesman said”.
4. “Britain, which has a large service sector, has had its national income revised upwards to reflect a higher pace of growth compared to other countries.“ | |
| |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 21:30 - Oct 25 with 884 views | Lord_Bony |
Sooner we re out of that bottomless pit of debt the better |  |
| |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 21:53 - Oct 25 with 876 views | LeonisGod |
| E.U. Punishes the U.K. for your economic success! Not a joke! on 16:01 - Oct 25 by Davillin |
[Please don’t call me names. I’m not allowed to reciprocate in kind, or your ears would be ringing like the Bells of Saint Oudoceus and your balls shrivelling up like dried prunes.]
Here are some of the lines you might have seen if you had read the article [emphasis added]:
1. “The UK was on Thursday ambushed with a demand from the European Commission for the extra money because Britain’s economy has performed better than other economies in Europe since 1995.
”The surcharge * - which would add almost a fifth to the UK's annual contribution of £8.6 billion - is intended to reflect Britain's better-than-expected economic performance relative to other EU states.
”It results from an EU recalculation of national incomes dating back to 1995 and taking into account recent changes in the rules ‡ to include economic activities such as prostitution and illegal drugs.]“
* A “surcharge” is an extra charge, or penalty, over and above the regular charge, usually to punish an error in reporting or paying.
‡ A change in rules which applies retroactively is called ex post facto and is unconscionable, if not illegal.
2. “Patrick O'Flynn, a Ukip MEP, said: "The EU's budget surcharge is effectively asking UK taxpayers to fork out for the disaster of the Eurozone.” [Note: As an MEP, he is in a position to know.]
3. “’It is not acceptable to have a demand such as this seemingly presented as a technical adjustment. It requires detailed political discussion,’ the spokesman said”.
4. “Britain, which has a large service sector, has had its national income revised upwards to reflect a higher pace of growth compared to other countries.“ |
Sarry Dav, but a lot of that is bollox.
1. They weren't ambushed and the calcs go back to 2002. It's not a penalty. The UK changed how we measure our economy, now including black market figures. WE gave the EU the economy figures. It's not something the EU have dreamt up.
2. UKIP are playing the media. The UK signed up to algorithm used to calculate contributions (actually we negotiated this really well originally, on the grounds that we don't receive as many agricultural hand outs as many other countries. So, historically we've done better than most (although Blair agreed to a 20% reduction when he renegotiated in 2007, which has lost the UK about £4 bn since, but you never hear about that).
3. It's based on figures we provided, not something that the EU has plucked out of thin air in a moment of spite. The timing and timescale are pathetic. It will be renegotiated.
4. We revised it upwards. So there should be any surprise in the UK govt that there's a corresponding extra contribution to be made. Again, the UK provides the figures against which the standard algorithm is applied.
And it's only 0.2% of our annual public spend. This is not a political issue. It's all been driven by accountants in accordance with procedures all member states have agreed too. But it makes good headlines for those looking for political mileage out of it. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
