| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 18:51 - May 21 with 1330 views | JackSomething |
£4m release clause? Eek! New contract offer on the table soon hopefully. |  |
| You know, Hobbes, some days even my lucky rocket ship underpants don't help. |
|  |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 18:55 - May 21 with 1310 views | jedijack |
I don't like the sound of that. |  | | |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 18:56 - May 21 with 1305 views | karnataka |
Consider?!?! WTF? Just do it and do it NOW FFS.  |  | | |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 19:11 - May 21 with 1278 views | max936 |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 18:56 - May 21 by karnataka |
Consider?!?! WTF? Just do it and do it NOW FFS. |
Innit, fuk my eyes  |  |
| |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 20:02 - May 21 with 1183 views | ApeShit |
That is scary, the way he performed this season I can see a few teams being interested in him. |  | | |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 20:15 - May 21 with 1153 views | monmouth |
Those two errors on sunday could be a very good thing for us. Can't see many 'bigger' teams risking 4m after one season that need a keeper. Wenger won't admit an error, United will be looking for 'better' (eg Cech or Lloris), City and Chelsea are sorted. That leaves Totto (if lloris goes) and Liverpool and I think they have other fish to fry, although Liverpool is a worry.
Still - get him tied up if we can, but I think we have to accept this is a player that will use us as a steppingstone if he can after being a cup winner with Arsenal. I has shown how much we need a commanding keeper for our defence though so we should know what we're after now if he does go. |  |
| |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 20:47 - May 21 with 1091 views | ApeShit |
| Swansea City consider rewarding Lukasz Fabianski with new contract on 20:15 - May 21 by monmouth |
Those two errors on sunday could be a very good thing for us. Can't see many 'bigger' teams risking 4m after one season that need a keeper. Wenger won't admit an error, United will be looking for 'better' (eg Cech or Lloris), City and Chelsea are sorted. That leaves Totto (if lloris goes) and Liverpool and I think they have other fish to fry, although Liverpool is a worry.
Still - get him tied up if we can, but I think we have to accept this is a player that will use us as a steppingstone if he can after being a cup winner with Arsenal. I has shown how much we need a commanding keeper for our defence though so we should know what we're after now if he does go. |
Spot on, even if we do tie him up to a new contract he'll move on if he has another good season, but at least we'll get decent money for him. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
