By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 00:17 - Sep 28 by Humpty
I'm glad you weren't a gullible thick c*nt Bluey. It's good to hear.
It's a shame your General can't say the same, despite having plenty to say for himself.
I thought the left's view was that it was an unsourced made up claim? Learn something new every day.
Assuming this General existed, try to play devil's advocate. How on earth is he meant to know that the intelligence claim that the action was based upon was invalid? Not speaking out about Iraq, well no-one could ahead of time. Anyone claiming they could is a liar.
As for comments about Corbyn, well, Corbyn's comments and associates are well documented. Ironically far more evidence about that then there turned out to be abut Iraq.
So claiming any General was wrong to not speak out about Iraq so should not have commented about Corbyn is a bit silly tbh.
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 16:24 - Sep 28 by Jack_Meoff
This is worth a watch...
Couldn't be arsed watching 18 minutes of Corbyn, but did he hug someone who invoked the Gas Chambers imagery with regards to benefits cuts in that video?
No of us know the details on just how everything will be redistributed but I d suggest those not wealth in any way will see themselves far worse off under this jerk.
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 09:03 - Sep 29 by perchrockjack
No of us know the details on just how everything will be redistributed but I d suggest those not wealth in any way will see themselves far worse off under this jerk.
We re heading headlong over the cliff
How will the poor be worse off?
If man evolved from monkeys why do we still have monkeys?
0
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 09:55 - Sep 29 with 1592 views
If you re gonna reply cotts, at least read exactly what I say.
I ll explain..again
MANY not wealthy will IN MY OPNION be worse off due to the much higher taxes and cost of living that Corbyn will affect.
You cannot say it wont be such. We don't know but how borrowing more and more is going to benefit us beats me. Its also the case many of the supe wealthy wil simply feck off and take their businesses elsewhere losing us even more jobs.
I note McDonnell suggests taking over tata at Redcar which would mean PUBLIC sponsoring an ailing company.
Truly, we face financial Armageddon if this nutter is let loose.
Finally, a nice human touch to have a lady in red get stuck in her wheelchair and have jez free her. Somehow the cynic im me took over that scenario
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 10:02 - Sep 29 by perchrockjack
If you re gonna reply cotts, at least read exactly what I say.
I ll explain..again
MANY not wealthy will IN MY OPNION be worse off due to the much higher taxes and cost of living that Corbyn will affect.
You cannot say it wont be such. We don't know but how borrowing more and more is going to benefit us beats me. Its also the case many of the supe wealthy wil simply feck off and take their businesses elsewhere losing us even more jobs.
I note McDonnell suggests taking over tata at Redcar which would mean PUBLIC sponsoring an ailing company.
Truly, we face financial Armageddon if this nutter is let loose.
Finally, a nice human touch to have a lady in red get stuck in her wheelchair and have jez free her. Somehow the cynic im me took over that scenario
You are aware that the national debt has increased by over 50% since the Tories took ever?
Yep, they're doing a stellar job.
0
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 12:09 - Sep 29 with 1513 views
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 12:09 - Sep 29 by blueytheblue
Debt in itself isn't always a problem, the question is how serviceable it is.
I don't disagree, but in the same period the total national debt has increased to 80% of GDP from, off the top of my head, around 64%. That doesn't strike me as more serviceable.
0
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 12:49 - Sep 29 with 1495 views
He reminds me of the old recluse most of us have lived near normally given a nickname by the local kids something like catweazel. He is totally unelectable with his extreme,unworkable economic views and his obvious hatred for anyone that has done well for themselves.
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 13:45 - Sep 29 by perchrockjack
Yes mill Jack I do and if your hero were to be given power it would spiral upwards .
Still, it ll be a fairer society.
Myass
My hero? That's the assumption of all assumptions but you crack on.
What I do find interesting is that people keep referring to Mr Corbyn as "unelectable", completely ignoring the fact that he was literally just elected....with the biggest mandate in Labour history no less.
You seem convinced that his policies would lead to greater debt, etc. yet many leading economists disagree - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/23/jeremy-corbyns-opposition-to-aus I'm assuming you have the stats to back up your claims? Or, alternatively, maybe you just have a deep dislike for him so you're instantly dismissive of his opinions? My bet is that it's the latter.
0
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 14:08 - Sep 29 with 1458 views
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 14:01 - Sep 29 by MillJack
My hero? That's the assumption of all assumptions but you crack on.
What I do find interesting is that people keep referring to Mr Corbyn as "unelectable", completely ignoring the fact that he was literally just elected....with the biggest mandate in Labour history no less.
You seem convinced that his policies would lead to greater debt, etc. yet many leading economists disagree - http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/23/jeremy-corbyns-opposition-to-aus I'm assuming you have the stats to back up your claims? Or, alternatively, maybe you just have a deep dislike for him so you're instantly dismissive of his opinions? My bet is that it's the latter.
So because he was elected as Labour leader in a system where the unions still dominate the votes means he's electable in a General Election then, especially one where Labour's own post election survey showed anti-austerity wasn't a vote winner?
The Guardian ( clearly no fans of Corbyn whatsoever ) link doesn't work by the way - 404 Page not found.
Now, can you tell us all how precisely Corbyn's claim to renationalise the railways will work? Given EU rules about state intervention / subsidies, that'll be an interesting one.
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 14:10 - Sep 29 by blueytheblue
So because he was elected as Labour leader in a system where the unions still dominate the votes means he's electable in a General Election then, especially one where Labour's own post election survey showed anti-austerity wasn't a vote winner?
The Guardian ( clearly no fans of Corbyn whatsoever ) link doesn't work by the way - 404 Page not found.
Now, can you tell us all how precisely Corbyn's claim to renationalise the railways will work? Given EU rules about state intervention / subsidies, that'll be an interesting one.
The link above should cover it. In regards to your Guardian comment they were simply printing the letter signed by numerous leading economists, it wasn't an article of opinions.
How do describe the increase in membership of the Labour Party to figures higher than those of 1999 when the party was in their pomp?
The fact is, time will tell whether he is electable or not in a General Election and neither of us have the faintest clue at this stage. However, he's clearly got a lot of peoples backs up, including you and Perch, which is fine by me.
0
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 14:28 - Sep 29 with 1444 views
The Jeremy Corbyn thread part two on 10:02 - Sep 29 by perchrockjack
If you re gonna reply cotts, at least read exactly what I say.
I ll explain..again
MANY not wealthy will IN MY OPNION be worse off due to the much higher taxes and cost of living that Corbyn will affect.
You cannot say it wont be such. We don't know but how borrowing more and more is going to benefit us beats me. Its also the case many of the supe wealthy wil simply feck off and take their businesses elsewhere losing us even more jobs.
I note McDonnell suggests taking over tata at Redcar which would mean PUBLIC sponsoring an ailing company.
Truly, we face financial Armageddon if this nutter is let loose.
Finally, a nice human touch to have a lady in red get stuck in her wheelchair and have jez free her. Somehow the cynic im me took over that scenario
The Govt assisting, or taking over, a failing company. That's radical thinking right there. No sane Govt would ever do that.
Anyhoo, I'm looking forward to your new economics book to come out. Should knock that leftie Picketty right off the top of the charts eh
Economics .... pays your money and takes your choice I guess, but some heavy hitters are lining up behind Corbynomics and to just dismiss that is a bit silly.
The link above should cover it. In regards to your Guardian comment they were simply printing the letter signed by numerous leading economists, it wasn't an article of opinions.
How do describe the increase in membership of the Labour Party to figures higher than those of 1999 when the party was in their pomp?
The fact is, time will tell whether he is electable or not in a General Election and neither of us have the faintest clue at this stage. However, he's clearly got a lot of peoples backs up, including you and Perch, which is fine by me.
40 economists wasn't it? I'd dare say you can find numerous backing austerity along with numerous advocating anti-austerity. As for Blanchflower, well, from what I can tell he seems to advocate changes to BoE that could well make it a more political entity removing it's independence.
Increase in membership - hmm well aside from those non-Labourites joining to vote Corbyn I'd well suspect many of the hard left returning to boost their man Corbyn. The same people who left when Labour were actually electable. The same people who had to be purged to make Labour electable.
The only reason he's got my back up is because any government require a strong opposition. That Corbyn doesn't provide given the U turns he's already performed. Can't stand on your principles and then reverse that old truck up...
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
