Wanyama 18:47 - Feb 6 with 1434 views | Joe_bradshaw | Sent off. Banned for next Saturday. | |
| | |
Wanyama on 18:52 - Feb 6 with 1394 views | union_jack | Harsh red I thought. Yellow for sure. Can a red card be downgraded in appeal? | |
| |
Wanyama on 18:52 - Feb 6 with 1388 views | dickythorpe | Every little helps, but we have to be sharper and defend a one goal lead | | | |
Wanyama on 18:54 - Feb 6 with 1364 views | Landore_Jack | Never a red. Saints will appeal that. | |
| |
Wanyama on 18:58 - Feb 6 with 1319 views | sketty_jack | Yeah can see that being rescinded. | | | |
Wanyama on 19:05 - Feb 6 with 1272 views | union_jack |
Wanyama on 18:58 - Feb 6 by sketty_jack | Yeah can see that being rescinded. |
Yep and then he'll score against us next week. Odds on! | |
| |
Wanyama on 19:54 - Feb 6 with 1152 views | PozuelosSideys | They destroyed us with set pieces at their place. That Dutch centre back in particular with corners. Wanyama is least of our problems. | |
| "Michu, Britton and Williams could have won 3-0 on their own. They wouldn't have required a keeper." | Poll: | Hattricks |
| |
Wanyama on 20:42 - Feb 6 with 1031 views | Kilkennyjack | Looked a red to me. No control in the tackle with a lot of aggression - and off his feet with full body weight. Red. | |
| Beware of the Risen People
|
| |
Wanyama on 21:13 - Feb 6 with 947 views | blaine_scfc | Thats not being rescinded, I would have said yellow, but not enough grounds for appeal, you can see why it was red. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Wanyama on 09:54 - Feb 7 with 736 views | Pegojack | I don't think that will be rescinded. It was what I'd call a 'revenge' tackle. The player he attempted to chop down had dispossessed him a second before, and narrowly avoided stamping on him in the process. You could see the red mist descending on Wanyama and he tore after him, determined to hurt him. The lad was very lucky Wanyama didn't connect as he wanted to, or that could have been a broken leg. | | | |
| |