| Chelski v Spuds 20:21 - May 2 with 6357 views | SwansNZ |
A bit niggly, will be a few Reds here if this carries on (and if Clattenburg finds his cards) |  |
| |  |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:23 - May 2 with 4662 views | airedale |
Amazing what he's let go uncarded (new word). |  | | |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:24 - May 2 with 4653 views | monmouth |
Clatto is being a real tw*t here. Five should be in the book. Asking for trouble. |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:37 - May 2 with 4609 views | airedale |
Bet Bafe said 'yeah, not bad' when that one went in. | | | |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:37 - May 2 with 4603 views | SwansNZ |
0-1
Be good if they take the title to the last day. | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:40 - May 2 with 4581 views | Borojack |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:37 - May 2 by SwansNZ |
0-1
Be good if they take the title to the last day. |
Be even better if they won it. |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:40 - May 2 with 4569 views | SwansNZ |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:40 - May 2 by Borojack |
Be even better if they won it. |
indeed
Should have made it 0-2 there [Post edited 2 May 2016 20:41]
| |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:43 - May 2 with 4543 views | ItchySphincter |
Come on Tottingham!! |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:44 - May 2 with 4529 views | sherpajacob |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:40 - May 2 by SwansNZ |
indeed
Should have made it 0-2 there [Post edited 2 May 2016 20:41]
|
They did |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:45 - May 2 with 4525 views | SwansNZ |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:44 - May 2 by sherpajacob |
They did |
Yeah, but that should have made it 3  | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:46 - May 2 with 4505 views | SwansNZ |
Oh goodie, another push and shove match | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:47 - May 2 with 4494 views | blueytheblue |
Bumbellend will gt a nice length ban for that attempted eye gouge. |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:50 - May 2 with 4467 views | monmouth |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:47 - May 2 by blueytheblue |
Bumbellend will gt a nice length ban for that attempted eye gouge. |
That should be 12 months for the c**t. Not even that it's on costa should reduce that. Disgusting piece of sh*t. | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:51 - May 2 with 4449 views | Jackfath |
He could have killed him! |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:51 - May 2 with 4448 views | blueytheblue |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:50 - May 2 by monmouth |
That should be 12 months for the c**t. Not even that it's on costa should reduce that. Disgusting piece of sh*t. |
Spurs have to keep their cool. They are winning a game they need to win, just not got to dive into tackles, not react to Chelsea provocation. | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:57 - May 2 with 4392 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:51 - May 2 by Jackfath |
He could have killed him! |
Did he kick a ball at him!?!
Disgusting
 |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:58 - May 2 with 4381 views | Cooperman |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:47 - May 2 by blueytheblue |
Bumbellend will gt a nice length ban for that attempted eye gouge. |
Dirty! Eye gouging in rugger is a lengthy ban and so it should be, don't expect to see him on a footy pitch again this season. |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:58 - May 2 with 4375 views | JackFish |
Think they're going to regret not beating West Brom last week unfortunately. |  | | |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:59 - May 2 with 4356 views | monmouth |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:51 - May 2 by Jackfath |
He could have killed him! |
Well now you see, a close friend was the victim of an eye gouge just like that which damaged his vision for life. You can explain how amusing it is to him if you like.
Edit - sorry fath, I know you don't mean it. It's just something I can't stand. [Post edited 2 May 2016 21:00]
| |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:00 - May 2 with 4353 views | blueytheblue |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:58 - May 2 by JackFish |
Think they're going to regret not beating West Brom last week unfortunately. |
Can see Everton maybe nicking a point off Leicester. Chelsea can beat Leicester, tho suspect they won't be particularly motivated for that game. | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:00 - May 2 with 4347 views | Jackfath |
| Chelski v Spuds on 20:59 - May 2 by monmouth |
Well now you see, a close friend was the victim of an eye gouge just like that which damaged his vision for life. You can explain how amusing it is to him if you like.
Edit - sorry fath, I know you don't mean it. It's just something I can't stand. [Post edited 2 May 2016 21:00]
|
Blimey! | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:04 - May 2 with 4318 views | SwansNZ |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:00 - May 2 by blueytheblue |
Can see Everton maybe nicking a point off Leicester. Chelsea can beat Leicester, tho suspect they won't be particularly motivated for that game. |
We still have a chance of finishing above Chelsea, just need to beat West Ham away and Man City at home. Should be easy enough. | |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:08 - May 2 with 4286 views | Joe_bradshaw |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:04 - May 2 by SwansNZ |
We still have a chance of finishing above Chelsea, just need to beat West Ham away and Man City at home. Should be easy enough. |
This has to be the worst title defence in Premier League history.
We've been shite and they're a whole four points better off. |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:24 - May 2 with 4221 views | icecoldjack |
WTF is poch doing taking off an attacking player and putting a more solid player in instead??
they are only winning by 2-1 so surely he needs to get more attack minded players on to try and score 5 goals ??
madness! |  | | |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:44 - May 2 with 4135 views | MrSwerve |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:24 - May 2 by icecoldjack |
WTF is poch doing taking off an attacking player and putting a more solid player in instead??
they are only winning by 2-1 so surely he needs to get more attack minded players on to try and score 5 goals ??
madness! |
Indeed they should sit back and throw away the lead.
2-2! |  |
| |
| Chelski v Spuds on 21:54 - May 2 with 4049 views | pikeypaul |
lamella is a dirty,sly bar steward.
twice he should have been sent off down here last season,for an elbow in Monteros face and also going over the top could have broken his leg. Niether even given a yellow.
main reason i want leicester to win the league |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
