Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:24 - May 28 with 3194 views | Darran | Warwick,Brynmill and others will be gutted. Thick tw*ts. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:41 - May 28 with 3135 views | veng9 | But I thought we were dirty scum who'd never be able to sign a player again. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:59 - May 28 with 3074 views | dobjack2 | Not have to pay any money - good However from that article the court of arbitration did not believe us that it was a free transfer but believed it was part of a player exchange - not so good What was the sell on clause then? 30% of any fee or 30% of any profit? For there to be no money owing it has to be the latter with the court valuing vorm as the same or less than we initially paid. If the court didn't believe us then it doesn't do our reputation any good. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 16:04 - May 28 with 3054 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:59 - May 28 by dobjack2 | Not have to pay any money - good However from that article the court of arbitration did not believe us that it was a free transfer but believed it was part of a player exchange - not so good What was the sell on clause then? 30% of any fee or 30% of any profit? For there to be no money owing it has to be the latter with the court valuing vorm as the same or less than we initially paid. If the court didn't believe us then it doesn't do our reputation any good. |
lol FIFA initially ruled that Swansea had acted correctly, leaving Utrecht to take the case to the Court of Arbritation for Sport. That court, according to van Shaik, have disagreed with FIFA's ruling and judged that this was a player exchange deal. However, they have ruled that no money is owed, determining that there was nothing untoward about the value of the deal. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 17:48 - May 28 with 2876 views | dobjack2 |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 16:04 - May 28 by Darran | lol FIFA initially ruled that Swansea had acted correctly, leaving Utrecht to take the case to the Court of Arbritation for Sport. That court, according to van Shaik, have disagreed with FIFA's ruling and judged that this was a player exchange deal. However, they have ruled that no money is owed, determining that there was nothing untoward about the value of the deal. |
sorry don't understand your comment. Nothing untoward about the value of the deal is what we agree on. The issue reading the article you linked to is that we appear to have said that it was a free transfer whilst the court ruled it was a player exchange. I.e they didn't believe us. That is not good from a reputation all point of view | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 17:50 - May 28 with 2870 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 17:48 - May 28 by dobjack2 | sorry don't understand your comment. Nothing untoward about the value of the deal is what we agree on. The issue reading the article you linked to is that we appear to have said that it was a free transfer whilst the court ruled it was a player exchange. I.e they didn't believe us. That is not good from a reputation all point of view |
We're not guilty I don't care. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:11 - May 28 with 2714 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:24 - May 28 by Darran | Warwick,Brynmill and others will be gutted. Thick tw*ts. |
Gutted beyond belief . (If you believe that of course) | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:20 - May 28 with 2695 views | dobjack2 |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 17:50 - May 28 by Darran | We're not guilty I don't care. |
If the article is correct the reason we are not guilty is that the value of Vorm in the player exchange did not result in the sell on clause being activated rather than him being a free transfer. A subtle difference. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:34 - May 28 with 2667 views | raynor94 |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:20 - May 28 by dobjack2 | If the article is correct the reason we are not guilty is that the value of Vorm in the player exchange did not result in the sell on clause being activated rather than him being a free transfer. A subtle difference. |
Oh, stop digging, no case to answer | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:36 - May 28 with 2662 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:34 - May 28 by raynor94 | Oh, stop digging, no case to answer |
Innit we are the innocent ones in this Rayns. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 20:02 - May 28 with 2636 views | monmouth |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:20 - May 28 by dobjack2 | If the article is correct the reason we are not guilty is that the value of Vorm in the player exchange did not result in the sell on clause being activated rather than him being a free transfer. A subtle difference. |
A subtle difference that makes no difference. Utrecht's claims had no merit. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 20:14 - May 28 with 2607 views | raynor94 |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:36 - May 28 by Darran | Innit we are the innocent ones in this Rayns. |
Never ceases to amaze me how quick some of our own fans on here can't wait to put the boot in their own club! | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 20:18 - May 28 with 2593 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 20:14 - May 28 by raynor94 | Never ceases to amaze me how quick some of our own fans on here can't wait to put the boot in their own club! |
Couldn't agree more Rayns some will be gutted we ain't guilty,fined £10million and banned from making transfers for the next five seasons. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 21:04 - May 28 with 2508 views | GTCJack | Swansea City in proven to be acting appropriately shocker. Must be the first thing we've got right in at least ten years. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 23:43 - May 28 with 2375 views | WarwickHunt |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:24 - May 28 by Darran | Warwick,Brynmill and others will be gutted. Thick tw*ts. |
Here's a Kleenex - wipe the sh1t off your nose. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 08:57 - May 29 with 2204 views | ItchySphincter |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 15:24 - May 28 by Darran | Warwick,Brynmill and others will be gutted. Thick tw*ts. |
Hope this'll shut up the tw@ts that are quick to believe the worst and use it as a stick to beat the club with. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:03 - May 29 with 2133 views | dobjack2 |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 19:34 - May 28 by raynor94 | Oh, stop digging, no case to answer |
Not a case of digging just reading the article. I am very pleased that we have won the case and do not have to pay more are not facing sanctions etc. Etc. Where I am uneasy is that the article states that the court of arbitration did not believe us in relation to the mechanics of the transfer. Player exchange and not as we stated a free. The fact that the decision took so long would also suggest that it was not a cut and dried decision. I hope that whatever has actually gone on, something that we won't know as all we will know is what has been reported, that we learn from it and move on. Some posters may disagree with my view and concerns - fair enough. I think that we will have to agree to disagree on this one. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:10 - May 29 with 2118 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 23:43 - May 28 by WarwickHunt | Here's a Kleenex - wipe the sh1t off your nose. |
On the mark as usual sir. You tell the f*cktard | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:11 - May 29 with 2110 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 08:57 - May 29 by ItchySphincter | Hope this'll shut up the tw@ts that are quick to believe the worst and use it as a stick to beat the club with. |
Some people seem to hate everything about the club Johnny and I find that very strange. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:16 - May 29 with 2099 views | Darran |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 23:43 - May 28 by WarwickHunt | Here's a Kleenex - wipe the sh1t off your nose. |
It must be demoralising being wrong so often Philip. | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:21 - May 29 with 2089 views | Brynmill_Jack |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 08:57 - May 29 by ItchySphincter | Hope this'll shut up the tw@ts that are quick to believe the worst and use it as a stick to beat the club with. |
Well the same people went into negotiations to sell the club behind the trust's backs. Or doesn't that count? | |
| Each time I go to Bedd - au........................ |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:47 - May 29 with 2047 views | DafyddHuw | Just in the interest of doing further business with Utrecht, I think we should have offered them , say £500K, to keep them sweet. Woulda meant nothing to club. If we can afford to keep wasters like Bartley at the club we could certainly afford that. They'll never sell anyone to us ever again. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 12:22 - May 29 with 1980 views | Whiterockin |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:47 - May 29 by DafyddHuw | Just in the interest of doing further business with Utrecht, I think we should have offered them , say £500K, to keep them sweet. Woulda meant nothing to club. If we can afford to keep wasters like Bartley at the club we could certainly afford that. They'll never sell anyone to us ever again. |
Offering a payment would have been seen as an admission of guilt when we have done nothing wrong. It could also give the impression that we are a soft touch. The main point here is being missed. Vorm wanted away when Fab came in and the club gave him his wish. No rules were broken. End of. | | | |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 13:12 - May 29 with 1944 views | ItchySphincter |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:21 - May 29 by Brynmill_Jack | Well the same people went into negotiations to sell the club behind the trust's backs. Or doesn't that count? |
Different subject Brynny! | |
| |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 13:13 - May 29 with 1942 views | ItchySphincter |
Swansea City win court battle with FC Utrecht over Michel Vorm on 10:47 - May 29 by DafyddHuw | Just in the interest of doing further business with Utrecht, I think we should have offered them , say £500K, to keep them sweet. Woulda meant nothing to club. If we can afford to keep wasters like Bartley at the club we could certainly afford that. They'll never sell anyone to us ever again. |
Maybe we could give them Bartley as a gesture? | |
| |
| |