By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Simon Barker's equaliser in the 6th Round in 1990 was special, but just looked it up and it was 83 minutes, so while it qualifies under 'wild celebrations' maybe it doesn't under 'late goals'.
But still...I'm asking for inclusion...1-0 up thanks to Razor, only for 'Bahnes' (as Motty always called him) to exploit Seaman's free-kick Achilles heel and then Rush putting them ahead with only ten to go ("and that's it" - declared Motty).
But that was not it. Was it, Motty? Was it, Simon?
We're throwing out new contracts like confetti, we may be loading them to get around P&S, we may have spent a chunk of the Eze money, and we may have mortgaged the future - at least to some degree.
So I'm not sure if I'd be entirely comfortable with more spend.
On the plus side, we may get more money in from selling players from the previous regime. Or maybe even players bought by this one. We are getting some nice money in now.
24th out of 29th in our Division. 23rd out of 24th for keepers who've played ten games or more.
Sadly, this correlates with last season's stats as well. And shot-stopping is his strong point.
Even allowing for interpretation - for instance, perhaps QPR allow more shots in front of goal or close in that are harder to save than the average team - it's grim reading.
I think the corners and frees delivery has slightly improved in the last few games, Ned?
It's not just about delivery, though, as we've said on here before. It's also about movement, runners, jumpers, decoys. We haven't looked as inventive or as urgent this season, it seems to me.
These are off sofascore. They're labelled as defensive stats, but Dunne's Aerial duels seem very high - I wonder if they include attacking headers as well...
I don't think for a second that Chair just decides that he's on corners, Spaceman. That has to be decided by whoever's in charge of set pieces.
A few weeks back, Jack Supple had us 23rd in both attacking and defending set-pieces for the entire season, so we're rank at them regardless of who's taking them.
I think our throw-ins are also terrible - long throws that aren't long - and would love to see the logic behind the decision to take them long. Also, if we're going to continue to take them long, then why isn't Cook taking them.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
