Only Criticism 19:09 - Aug 31 with 6547 views | NoDiddley | Can Joe Lumley save a penalty one day😜 | | | | |
Only Criticism on 19:26 - Aug 31 with 3819 views | smegma | Or could a ref not give such ridiculous penalties in the first place ??? | | | |
Only Criticism on 19:37 - Aug 31 with 3761 views | WEAREAWFUL | not if he keeps diving the wrong way great win though | | | |
Only Criticism on 20:01 - Aug 31 with 3634 views | Boston | Going the wrong way, but if he'd have guessed right, they'd have been taking it again. | |
| |
Only Criticism on 20:15 - Aug 31 with 3590 views | bosh67 | I think he's a great keeper but for the love of God can someone show him how to wait until the player is actually kicking it to even have a chance of going the right way. He might as well stand behind the goal for all the difference it makes. However, most other things he does well and if we didn't keep giving pens away he wouldn't have to leap out the way comedy style every time. | |
| |
Only Criticism on 21:39 - Aug 31 with 3343 views | VancouverHoop | I'm a bit concerned that he doesn't seem to have improved on last season. Penalties are pretty much a lost cause, so I don't especially expect much better. But he still flaps at too many balls, and his distribution is sub-par. But I'm not sure we've anyone better, though it'd be nice to see Dieng get a couple of games. | | | |
Only Criticism on 22:25 - Aug 31 with 3228 views | PinnerPaul | He's out on loan | | | |
Only Criticism on 22:48 - Aug 31 with 3178 views | LongsufferingR | To be fair, no other goalkeeper in the world would have saved that one today. No other referee in the world would have given it either. | | | |
Only Criticism on 23:27 - Aug 31 with 3113 views | Esox_Lucius | "and his distribution is sub-par." especially that smart throw out which led directly to our winning goal. | |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
Only Criticism on 00:45 - Sep 1 with 3000 views | smegma | Yeah but........ | | | |
Only Criticism on 00:47 - Sep 1 with 2994 views | VancouverHoop | Yeah I know, but I'd still like to see him get a chance at some point. | | | |
Only Criticism on 00:51 - Sep 1 with 2982 views | VancouverHoop | Even stopped clocks etc. But seriously, and obviously, I want him to do well. But I've yet to see the type of improvement you'd hope for in a young keeper in his second season at this level. Maybe it'll come. I hope so. | | | |
Only Criticism on 01:42 - Sep 1 with 2913 views | timcocking | Could not fcuking believe it. To give that at 0-0, unbelievable. No way the ref saw what went on there. Good to see they gave us the world's most offside goal in history to make up for it. | | | |
Only Criticism on 01:46 - Sep 1 with 2911 views | Boston | Just as well you’re not a referee Timothy. | |
| |
Only Criticism on 01:53 - Sep 1 with 2889 views | timcocking | No it isn't, i'd give us a tonne of penalties! | | | |
Only Criticism on 10:10 - Sep 1 with 2636 views | smegma | Have you seen him play ?? | | | |
Only Criticism on 12:57 - Sep 1 with 2489 views | qprxtc | He’ll save Luton’s penalty. | | | |
Only Criticism on 13:27 - Sep 1 with 2446 views | terryb | What offside goal? Hugill didn't play (or attempt to) the ball that Wells fastened on to. Therefore, by the laws of the game, he is not offside! He was also behind the ball when Wells passed to him, so again he is not offside. WEhether this should be the law is another matter! | | | |
Only Criticism on 14:02 - Sep 1 with 2380 views | Boston | Spot on Terry. I was actually impressed by Hugill's awareness and his hand waving reactions to remind the officials of this. | |
| |
Only Criticism on 16:21 - Sep 1 with 2295 views | VancouverHoop | No. Which is why I'd like the opportunity. [Post edited 1 Sep 2019 16:28]
| | | |
Only Criticism on 16:28 - Sep 1 with 2280 views | Esox_Lucius | If you are only going to look for his frailties you'll never see any improvement will you. The fact that you want to see him replaced by a keeper who is on loan, that you have never seen play, says much about your judgement. | |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
Only Criticism on 17:04 - Sep 1 with 2225 views | LazyFan | I thought Manning passed to him and it was Wells who passed to Manning. But I agree, not only was he not interfering with play, but Wells pass was meant for Manning anyway. If Wed players decide not to play to the whistle thats their fault when they don't run back and close Hugnill out. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | |
| |
Only Criticism on 17:05 - Sep 1 with 2222 views | LazyFan | Smithers would have saved it. But then he's a freak! Another ref would have given it, as it's against QPR of course! zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz | |
| |
Only Criticism on 17:20 - Sep 1 with 2203 views | VancouverHoop | I haven't said I wanted to see Lumley replaced by anyone. In fact I said I hope that his play improves. I'd like to see Dieng given a start, at some point, as the reports of of his play elsewhere are encouraging that's all. | | | |
Only Criticism on 17:26 - Sep 1 with 2192 views | QPROslo | Think it was Wells pass that Manning fastened onto with a good run down the left having collected Lumley's throw at the start of the move, and then fed to the by now onside Hugill - to give credit to Manning there too. | | | |
Only Criticism on 17:34 - Sep 1 with 2161 views | terryb | Definitely Manning who collected the ball & passed to Hugill. I'll attribute that slight mistake of mine to my age! | | | |
| |