By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Brilliant reaction to a something that has been concocted by the right wing media to provoke reaction.. enjoy worrying about this 15 year old child escaping our wholesome values at the same time the "UK democracy" crumbles in order to reestablish an elitist mindset. This is real news of course.
Interesting that she says she wants to bring her child up quietly in the UK. If she is eventually let back in here, it seems highly likely that a jail sentence could be imposed but it would also have to be decided whether she is indeed considered to be a fit mother and allowed to keep her child.
Her Mum died when she was 14. She appears to have been groomed from that point on and an expectation placed on her that she should be a martyr to the cause and go to ISIL controlled Syria.
There's no doubt she has broken the law. However, rather than managing the situation Javed has said she is not our problem when we have created the circumstances which crafted it.
And her child? A baby, less than a week old, shouldn't be held accountable for the sins of the parents, however distasteful we find the parents actions.
Because, in International Law, you cannot make somebody stateless, the UK will have to accept her back. She's currently in a Syrian refugee camp. I cant imagine British officials busting a gut to bring her into the UK.
But, when she returns, she should be put in detention. Time to be determined.
Only if you have single nationality, she has dual nationality.
She should not have had her citizenship revoked. She should be allowed back to Britain, where she should be investigated, and then prosecuted, if her actions are deemed prosecutable.
That's the way the law should work. Once you start picking and choosing who the law applies to, you're on your way to disaster.
I don't have the slightest bit of sympathy with her. I'd be perfectly happy to see her in a prison cell. But I don't think that's' an excuse to start robbing her of her rights as a British citizen. No one has ever tried taking away the citizenship of the many and varied Britons who've been involved as mercenaries in coups in Africa.
She should not have had her citizenship revoked. She should be allowed back to Britain, where she should be investigated, and then prosecuted, if her actions are deemed prosecutable.
That's the way the law should work. Once you start picking and choosing who the law applies to, you're on your way to disaster.
I don't have the slightest bit of sympathy with her. I'd be perfectly happy to see her in a prison cell. But I don't think that's' an excuse to start robbing her of her rights as a British citizen. No one has ever tried taking away the citizenship of the many and varied Britons who've been involved as mercenaries in coups in Africa.
From what I've read, about 100 others had already lost citizenship.
Well I read she does. Like someone said earlier, her family and lawyer will say one thing, the press will say different.
Interesting she has a lawyer despite never having done a days work in her life. Legal aid no doubt. Paid for by tax payers. The same tax payers she would want dead. Or even those teenagers killed in Manchester, girls of the same age as her at the time. She reckons the bombing was justified. Well I think it's justified if she never sets foot in our country ever again. Or Europe.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
