Forum | Slow news day at the sub-Standard by smegma

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Slow news day at the sub-Standard 14:31 - Mar 27 with 2011 views

It must be as we're on the back page and pages 56-57. Surprised they know who we are. When you go on their website you click on football and a list of clubs comes up. It has all London Premier clubs then the two Manchester clubs plus Barca and Real ??!!

https://www.standard.co.uk/sport/football/qpr/qpr-could-become-tenants-at-linfor

Slow news day at the sub-Standard on 14:50 - Mar 27 with 1933 views

traininvain

Gove's on the front page of today's paper copy wearing a QPR training top!

Slow news day at the sub-Standard on 15:06 - Mar 27 with 1889 views

BucksRanger

And The Telegraph.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2019/03/27/michael-gove-jogging-qpr-top/

Slow news day at the sub-Standard on 15:59 - Mar 27 with 1759 views

Snipper

A big 100% no to being tenants at any new ground, whether it be the Linford Christie stadium, or any other stadium.

I’d rather us stay at Loftus Road being a Championship, League One or even League Two side.

We simply have to own our ground, wherever it is.

Slow news day at the sub-Standard on 16:34 - Mar 27 with 1691 views

Toast_R

Slow news day at the sub-Standard on 15:59 - Mar 27 by Snipper
A big 100% no to being tenants at any new ground, whether it be the Linford Christie stadium, or any other stadium. I’d rather us stay at Loftus Road being a Championship, League One or even League Two side. We simply have to own our ground, wherever it is.

That's right. Although, the West Ham deal seems pretty good for them.
If you can get a 100 year tenancy agreement at a "for peanuts deal", surely has to be considered?

It depends, if it's a stadium built for football that can be used for other events then fine. But if it's an athletics stadium with no foresight into what happens next, then they can keep it, we don't want it.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread