| FAO Clive - site structure 15:48 - Jan 23 with 1438 views | Lewes_r |
I think we need a separate social media message board/bored on here.. I dislike the twitter obsession nowadays but its a reality of our present.. infact its dominating things on here a bit.. Im not saying its irrelanvant but I do pine for the old days where people talked about football rather than what the players are thinking right this second..
maybe we can have a separate section for it along with "rumours" or something? [Post edited 1 Jan 1970 1:00]
|  |
| |  |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:35 - Jan 23 with 987 views | peejaybee |
Totally Agree,Best Suggestion Ever. |  |
| If at first you dont succeed, pack up and f**k off home. |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:40 - Jan 23 with 962 views | Northernr |
There isn't the potential for another sub board on the site as it uis now, and I've always avoided splitting the board up into different forums because you inevitably get one that's used more than the others and big arguments about threads that should be moved from one place to another. It doesn't work IMO, the more sub forums you have the worse your message board gets.
That said I totally agree with what you're saying. The solution, IMO, is...
1 - Stop starting a new thread everytime Joey Barton tweets. Glance down the board, there's a thread there already I'm sure, just add to that.
2 - I shall up my game a bit and start deleting when people do start a new thread when they can just add to another one.
It should be pretty easy to keep the Joey Barton just tweeted... stuff to a couple of threads. That way people can avoid it if they want and it won't dominate the board. |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:46 - Jan 23 with 937 views | real_loftus |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:40 - Jan 23 by Northernr |
There isn't the potential for another sub board on the site as it uis now, and I've always avoided splitting the board up into different forums because you inevitably get one that's used more than the others and big arguments about threads that should be moved from one place to another. It doesn't work IMO, the more sub forums you have the worse your message board gets.
That said I totally agree with what you're saying. The solution, IMO, is...
1 - Stop starting a new thread everytime Joey Barton tweets. Glance down the board, there's a thread there already I'm sure, just add to that.
2 - I shall up my game a bit and start deleting when people do start a new thread when they can just add to another one.
It should be pretty easy to keep the Joey Barton just tweeted... stuff to a couple of threads. That way people can avoid it if they want and it won't dominate the board. |
Have you considered "Infraction Points"? |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:46 - Jan 23 with 932 views | peejaybee |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:40 - Jan 23 by Northernr |
There isn't the potential for another sub board on the site as it uis now, and I've always avoided splitting the board up into different forums because you inevitably get one that's used more than the others and big arguments about threads that should be moved from one place to another. It doesn't work IMO, the more sub forums you have the worse your message board gets.
That said I totally agree with what you're saying. The solution, IMO, is...
1 - Stop starting a new thread everytime Joey Barton tweets. Glance down the board, there's a thread there already I'm sure, just add to that.
2 - I shall up my game a bit and start deleting when people do start a new thread when they can just add to another one.
It should be pretty easy to keep the Joey Barton just tweeted... stuff to a couple of threads. That way people can avoid it if they want and it won't dominate the board. |
Go on then Clive, start deletiing and put your foot down with a firm hand.!!!!!! | |
| If at first you dont succeed, pack up and f**k off home. |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:48 - Jan 23 with 916 views | WeAreQPR12 |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:46 - Jan 23 by real_loftus |
Have you considered "Infraction Points"? |
Clive has his own way's of dealing with things in an adult manner and as infraction pt's have made a well known other QPR forum a complete joke I don't think we will be following suit. |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:52 - Jan 23 with 891 views | Juzzie |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:48 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
Clive has his own way's of dealing with things in an adult manner and as infraction pt's have made a well known other QPR forum a complete joke I don't think we will be following suit. |
Hence real_loftus' tongue-in-cheek remark.
|  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:53 - Jan 23 with 885 views | TheBlob |
Would this mean threads about Heather Graham would be banned?
Not sure that would work.
 |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:53 - Jan 23 with 883 views | tinhead |
why not have a couple of stickies at the top?
1) Barton's tweet
2) Transfer gossip
3) The inevitable Stadium thread |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:53 - Jan 23 with 876 views | hoopstilidie |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:48 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
Clive has his own way's of dealing with things in an adult manner and as infraction pt's have made a well known other QPR forum a complete joke I don't think we will be following suit. |
Whoosh!!!! |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:54 - Jan 23 with 877 views | Lewes_r |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:53 - Jan 23 by tinhead |
why not have a couple of stickies at the top?
1) Barton's tweet
2) Transfer gossip
3) The inevitable Stadium thread |
this is good | |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:55 - Jan 23 with 863 views | WeAreQPR12 |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:53 - Jan 23 by hoopstilidie |
Whoosh!!!! |
No I did get his sarcasm, but I wanted to just make sure the slower posters understood, I'm good like that. | | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:59 - Jan 23 with 846 views | TW_R |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:55 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
No I did get his sarcasm, but I wanted to just make sure the slower posters understood, I'm good like that. |
No you didn't.
And I like the " I don't think we will be following suit." You're now running this board now are you?
|  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:02 - Jan 23 with 830 views | TW_R |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:54 - Jan 23 by Lewes_r |
this is good |
No it's not. Stickies can get annoying as they sit at the top, even when they're not being used. Just read the threads you want to. There are loads of football related threads today. The ones that say the word "twitter" in should give you an idea what they're about. | | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:03 - Jan 23 with 818 views | WeAreQPR12 |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:59 - Jan 23 by TW_R |
No you didn't.
And I like the " I don't think we will be following suit." You're now running this board now are you?
|
TW Clive runs this site which I think we are all aware about.
I was meaning us as in us on this board.
I'm am part of this board and us means we all bat for the same team. | | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:15 - Jan 23 with 785 views | FDC |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:03 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
TW Clive runs this site which I think we are all aware about.
I was meaning us as in us on this board.
I'm am part of this board and us means we all bat for the same team. |
".... we all bat for the same team"
So tempting... but nah.
I've been on other boards where sub-forums work, but I don't think it works for football - how do you split things up? "Does this go in the 'match day' forum or 'starting XI' forum?" It would be daft
The fact that this board has traditionally been so readable is down to the efforts of Clive moderating it on his tod and the self-management of the posters - people in the past have been pretty good about reading what's already been written and adding their comments to an existing thread if there is one.
|  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:19 - Jan 23 with 772 views | Cogster |
how about a bit of LFW merchandise in the site shop???
Always fancied a LFW t-shirt..   |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:25 - Jan 23 with 755 views | kropotkin41 |
I think there may be some members who like a little bit of discipline....... if you know what I mean.......
I was thinking about this very thing today, but it seems that sub-forums are out. So, all of you folks keen on discussing JB's latest twits are going to have to show some restraint and just post about it on one fascinating super-thread.
..... or, even better IMO, just stop paying it any attention at all. |  |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:30 - Jan 23 with 735 views | StraightR |
Even better, IMO, just sign up to Twitter and communicate with the man himself if you feel the need to engage. @Joey7Barton, in case anyone in the world doesn't know yet. |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:35 - Jan 23 with 706 views | JAY |
Dont split the board up. thats where so many other sites go wrong.
if you see a post about barton just ignore it if your that bothered. |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:40 - Jan 23 with 693 views | BromleyHoop |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 16:46 - Jan 23 by real_loftus |
Have you considered "Infraction Points"? |
Or Power pished Moderators to enforce discipline on the site while Clive's away on holi.....oh. Can't leave it alone can you?! |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:42 - Jan 23 with 679 views | WeAreQPR12 |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:35 - Jan 23 by JAY |
Dont split the board up. thats where so many other sites go wrong.
if you see a post about barton just ignore it if your that bothered. |
you're not your. | | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:52 - Jan 23 with 643 views | loftboy |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:42 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
you're not your. |
Who are you the farking spelling police |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:54 - Jan 23 with 634 views | Charlie1 |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:42 - Jan 23 by WeAreQPR12 |
you're not your. |
Did you apologise to Ron?
Get the culling and banning stick out Clive! |  |
| |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:56 - Jan 23 with 625 views | LancsBushRs |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:52 - Jan 23 by loftboy |
Who are you the farking spelling police |
f(u)cking not farking  |  | | |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:57 - Jan 23 with 614 views | loftboy |
| FAO Clive - site structure on 17:56 - Jan 23 by LancsBushRs |
f(u)cking not farking |
 | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
