| Chelscum v Naarwich 20:05 - Jan 17 with 2361 views | flynnbo |
Is that a dog playing for the scum in the 44 shirt? [Post edited 17 Jan 2018 20:06]
|  | | |  |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 21:51 - Jan 17 with 2250 views | MrSheen |
Have some of that! 94th minute equaliser. Lovely boos! |  | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 21:57 - Jan 17 with 2221 views | Hadders |
Look at the Delia and the other Norwich fans. Who cares about the cup? |  | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 21:59 - Jan 17 with 2212 views | MrSheen |
Second yellow card for diving vermin. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:04 - Jan 17 with 2190 views | smegma |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 21:59 - Jan 17 by MrSheen |
Second yellow card for diving vermin. |
If they get a hat trick of yellows for diving, who keeps the match ball.
Cheating c@@@nts. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:30 - Jan 17 with 2122 views | smegma |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:04 - Jan 17 by smegma |
If they get a hat trick of yellows for diving, who keeps the match ball.
Cheating c@@@nts. |
3 yellows for diving, two red cards !!!!
Who keeps the ball ??!!!!! [Post edited 17 Jan 2018 22:31]
| | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:31 - Jan 17 with 2109 views | MrSheen |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:04 - Jan 17 by smegma |
If they get a hat trick of yellows for diving, who keeps the match ball.
Cheating c@@@nts. |
There's the hat trick! Vermin down to nine men. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:31 - Jan 17 with 2109 views | flynnbo |
The club which keeps on giving. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:33 - Jan 17 with 2094 views | ingeminate |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:31 - Jan 17 by flynnbo |
The club which keeps on giving. |
Only watched last ten - this ref seems awesome! |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:33 - Jan 17 with 2094 views | Hadders |
The second was a pen to be honest, and we'd be screaming for the last one, too. Ref is a Ranger, I reckon. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:34 - Jan 17 with 2081 views | kensalriser |
If he's not Rangers he's Fulham! |  |
| |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:34 - Jan 17 with 2079 views | nix |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:33 - Jan 17 by ingeminate |
Only watched last ten - this ref seems awesome! |
Favourite ref ever |  | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:35 - Jan 17 with 2065 views | bob566 |
Ref gave Morata second yellow for backchat. Strong ref. Good to see | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:36 - Jan 17 with 2064 views | ingeminate |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:33 - Jan 17 by Hadders |
The second was a pen to be honest, and we'd be screaming for the last one, too. Ref is a Ranger, I reckon. |
Thing is if there is karma given hazzard/Pedro etc then they are due a few bad decisions. Personally I wouldn’t have given it as a pen but wouldn’t have booked the player as there was some contact. | |
| |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:46 - Jan 17 with 1987 views | stevec |
Cheating vermin scum.
I’d rather watch us getting beaten every week than support filth like that lot. |  | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:49 - Jan 17 with 1964 views | DeepcutHoop |
Brilliant to see a ref give a 2nd yellow for dissent. Far too many players get away with screaming directly in the refs face when they get carded.
Rooney being the worst. Lost count of the amount of times he's got away with shouting 'F*** off' inches from a ref's face and not been pulled up. | | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 23:20 - Jan 17 with 1871 views | daveB |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 22:33 - Jan 17 by Hadders |
The second was a pen to be honest, and we'd be screaming for the last one, too. Ref is a Ranger, I reckon. |
was never a penalty, touching someones shoulder and trying to pull them back shouldn't force the player to fall forward flat on his face, the Norwich player didn't stop him from getting the ball the man just threw himself down as he had been touched, It was a clear dive never a penalty |  | | |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 00:10 - Jan 18 with 1819 views | johncharles |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 23:20 - Jan 17 by daveB |
was never a penalty, touching someones shoulder and trying to pull them back shouldn't force the player to fall forward flat on his face, the Norwich player didn't stop him from getting the ball the man just threw himself down as he had been touched, It was a clear dive never a penalty |
How many times have you seen it though, a player is “pulled” back and falls forward. It’s a dive. |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 01:47 - Jan 18 with 1758 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Chelscum v Naarwich on 00:10 - Jan 18 by johncharles |
How many times have you seen it though, a player is “pulled” back and falls forward. It’s a dive. |
Interesting one. The defender's hand on his shoulder could be either holding him back or forcing him too wide to chase the ball. How much actual effect it has is hard to judge but there is at least the case for a penalty. I don't see why impeding/grabbing/shirt pulling/etc should be as tolerated much as it is.
That Morata then falls forwards after the lightest touch on his back is clearly a dive but he had grounds for thinking he should get a penalty. I suppose that does make it a yellow - the ref had already tolerated the foul - as it is a separate offence.
But it is a contentious series of events and for the ref to then give the second yellow for dissent is a strong call: Morata had genuine grounds to take issue with the ref's view of proceedings.
I am all for refs cutting out the in-your-face disputation of decisions but in this case, at least, I'd have said something along the lines of "Decision's made, now back off or get a second yellow".
And much as I dislike Norwich for our hoodoo against them (as well as, well, they're just an awful club, aren't they: I mean, that song, 'On The Sodding Ball'!) I got absolutely no pleasure from Chelsea's clinical penalties. The less-hated club lost. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
