Quantcast
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Arsenal step in as QPR wilt – result
Friday, 6th Mar 2015 01:54 by Clive Whittingham

QPR ran out of fit players and ideas after a bright start against Arsenal at Loftus Road on Wednesday night, eventually slipping to a 2-1 defeat.

That QPR lost to Arsenal should be no great surprise. That so many people are being so critical about the way the loss came about reflects not only a vulnerability in Arsene Wenger’s team that QPR picked at but never penetrated in the first half, but also Rangers’ desperation for points in any form.

That, and the world of modern football and social media where every victory is life changing, and every defeat is a cataclysmic disaster for which scapegoats must be burned alive in a wicker man.

QPR were badly hamstrung before this match even kicked off. Leroy Fer and Richard Dunne are long term absentees, and Michael Doughty and Rio Ferdinand were added to the short term list before kick-off. The People’s Champion Joey Barton missed the first game of his three match suspension for being a tall tree and catching the most win i.e. punching somebody in the testicles. Mauricio Isla was fit enough only for a cameo so youth-teamer Darnell Furlong had to make only the second start of his professional career against Alexis Sanchez, a poet of a footballer with talent so exceptional you have to watch video clips back afterwards to believe what you’ve just seen.

Then there’s Harry Redknapp’s summer transfer policy, which was entirely geared towards the team playing a back-three formation this season. Having abandoned that after just two matches he left Rangers trying to field a 4-4-2 formation despite being short at right and left wing, right and left back, and centre forward. In fact, apart from players who can play in the withdrawn number 10 role behind a target man, QPR are short of just about everything. Four transfer windows, £60m, 21 permanent signings, and that’s Redknapp’s legacy.

The plan, such as it was, concocted from what was available to Chris Ramsey, was as basic as plans come. Charlie Austin and Bobby Zamora played together up front and the ball was pumped long and early towards them. Matt Phillips played on the right wing and Junior Hoilett on the left, charged with taking on their full backs and delivering crosses – Phillips did; Hoilett, as usual, did not. Karl Henry and Sandro were sent in to disrupt the midfield and the addition of Nedum Onuoha at centre half alongside Caulker and in between Furlong and Suk-Young Yun made for an unusually youthful, and therefore mobile, back four.

It was football 1.1. And, for a half at least, it was plenty good enough.

Charlie Austin hit powerful shots from the edge of the area straight at goalkeeper David Ospina twice in the first 20 minutes - the first a chance of his own making, the second after Bobby Zamora had muscled some time and space for his partner. Austin ran through on goal at the midway point of the half but was flagged offside. Ospina fumbled a Hoilett cross into the danger area after the Canadian had been picked out be a sweeping crossfield ball from Furlong, but nobody was on hand to capitalise.


Ten minutes before half time Austin teed himself up for a volley, beat Opsina all ends up from 25 yards, but his shot flew a foot wide of the post.

By the break, Arsenal’s positive contributions to the game could be counted on the fingers of one hand. Rosicky burning Yun for pace but failing to deliver a cross, and a low shot from Olivier Giroud straight at Green was as good as it got.

They were almost as bad as referee Kevin Friend, fresh from recent disasters at Bradford and Sunderland and looking like a man desperately praying no remotely borderline decisions come his way to judge. He booked Karl Henry for his first foul of the match after half an hour, a nothing tackle on Rosicky, and then did likewise to Héctor Bellerín for a trip on Junior Hoilett seconds later. Neither looked a booking to me. When Sandro then fouled Rosicky in first half injury time, and it looked a yellow card all ends up, no booking was handed out,

Giroud batting down a troublesome bouncer with the palm of his hand basketball style, then turning to run towards goal with the controlled ball at his feet, and Friend waving play on, was a particular highlight.

But poor referee or not, it couldn’t be denied that QPR were more than holding their own, and Arsenal were miles below par. A conversations in the gents at half time about how much trouble we could be in when the visitors introduced Mesut Ozil sent me scampering for a team sheet. The German World Cup winner had in fact played from the start. You’d never have known.

But QPR’s second handicap was soon to loom large on the horizon. Not only was there a lengthy list of absentees before the kick off, but a number of the players named in the matchday squad are incapable of playing 90 minutes. The club’s criminally incompetent transfer policy during the last few years has, for example, left the team inordinately reliant on Bobby Zamora, who is largely a spent force altogether and certainly declines in effectiveness from a low starting point after half time. Sandro too had clearly been signed off for 50 minutes by the medics and no more. Mauricio Isla, surely only fit enough for 20 minutes, otherwise why not bring him off the bench sooner? Or start him right back against his fellow Chilean Sanchez?

When Steven Caulker inadvertently split Nedum Onuoha’s cheek in a head clash before half time, forcing an early substitution and introduction of Clint Hill, it made the maths difficult. Ramsey would have wanted to take off Zamora, Hoilett and Sandro. In the end it was Zamora who had to play a full 90, and was totally ineffective by the end. To make matters worse, when Sandro was withdrawn the only replacement available was Niko Krsanjcar, who’s never been a man for the middle of a 4-4-2 even when he was fit, interested and playing in a good team.

The Croatian is none of those things now and contributed significantly to Arsenal’s first goal by trying a laboured flick and trick on the edge of the box against players used to playing against the finest, fittest and sharpest talents in Europe. Arsenal broke, exposed Furlong, and Giroud swept home a loose ball from close range. The Frenchman, so abject when his club really needed him against Monaco, so moany when Arsenal were on the back foot in the first half, sensed a flat track ahead of him and commenced bullying. The archetypal modern Arsenal player.

Wenger had been forced to change his centre backs in the first half too. Gabriel Paulista didn’t fancy it much, pulled up lame after a difficult 30 minutes, and Laurent Koscielny came on to replace him. The Frenchman was commanding and assertive – another who’d do well to be as dominant in a big match. While Hill and Kranjcar played poorly and weakened QPR, Arsenal’s changes made them stronger, even the enforced ones. Chris Ramsey, like I say, not blessed with a great deal of other options.

The second goal, slipped in by Sanchez at the near post, will disappoint Rob Green, but to be honest at that stage it was like the Alamo and Green was a fine last line of defence. The keeper dived full stretch to his right to save one shot from Ozil having been unsighted by a wall of defenders, then he deflected another onto the post, and finally he rushed from his line to deny Sanchez one on one after Caulker had been caught dallying in possession. Arsenal were turning the screw.

You couldn’t fault QPR too much. Karl Henry had been on a par with Sandro when the pair were together, and he battled manfully to do the work of two men when Kranjcar sauntered on – a night of hard graft that deserved greater reward. Yun, too, was excellent with and without the ball And Charlie Austin in attack was tireless – a permanent threat in front of the England manager. Eventually he succeeded where he’d failed in the first half, and Phillips had in the second from similar range, by catching Ospina out from 20 yards. A routine shot that dipped under the keeper and halved the deficit gave QPR hope, but to be honest Friend should have awarded a penalty kick when Ozil was pulled back trying to convert a chance from close range.

An Arsenal win by a single goal was fair, they’d battered away for 30 minutes in the second half and could have scored twice as many. You finish fourth every year by winning games like this, when the going is good to firm. Defeats at Stoke, against Monaco, in the cup at Bradford and so on, matter little when fourth is your aim and nothing more. Arsenal excel on nights like this and once Sandro had gone off they made hay.

Nobody typified their performance more than Giroud. Anonymous, whiny and completely ineffective in the first half, he suddenly perked up in the second and looked like a world beater. When Arsenal needed a centre forward against Monaco last week, he had the worst game of his life. That’s Arsenal. When the going gets good, Arsenal get going.

And that’s QPR. Capable of putting bits and pieces together for periods of time, but ultimately short in several positions and reliant on players who aren’t physically capable of meeting the demands of the Premier League. Chris Ramsey knew, before he even kicked off, that he’d have to take off Sandro and Zamora well before the end. When Onuoha went off in the first half it scuppered the whole thing. Sandro’s removal, and Kranjcar’s dreadful cameo, were key, but QPR had ceded much of their bright early start before that with the first change. In the end, as at Hull, there was a queue of players – Hoilett, Phillips, Zamora – who probably needed to go off but couldn’t because of the circumstances. When you admit that and then look at the quality of player we’re playing against in a match like this it’s little wonder the game was lost is it?

There are enough winnable games to come to salvage the situation – Everton, Newcastle, Villa, West Ham, Leicester, Palace, even Spurs all to play. But it’s going to need players to return from injuries, and it’s probably going to need more than punting it long to Bobby Zamora, to do it. At the moment all signs point to a similar outcome to the one we had here – not disgraced, but not quite good enough.

Links >>> Photo Gallery >>> Ratings and Reports >>> Message Board Match Thread >>> Knee Jerks

QPR: Green 7; Furlong 6, Caulker 5, Onuoha 6 (Hill 44, 5), Yun 7; Phillips 6, Henry 7, Sandro 7 (Kranjcar 56, 4), Hoilett 4 (Isla 73, 6); Austin 8, Zamora 6

Subs not used: Wright-Phillips, McCarthy, Vargas, Zarate

Goals: Austin 82 (assisted Phillips)

Bookings: Henry 31 (foul), Yun 79 (foul)

Arsenal: Ospina 5; Bellerin 8, Mertesacker 6, Paulista 5 (Koscielny 37, 7), Gibbs 6; Coquelin 7, Cazorla 6; Rosicky 8 (Ramsey 87, -), Ozil 5 (Welbeck 93, -) Sanchez 9, Giroud 6

Subs not used: Walcott, Oxlade-Chamberlain, Martinez, Chambers

Goals: Giroud 64 (assisted Sanchez), Sanchez 69 (assisted Gibbs)

Bookings: Bellerín 33 (foul)

QPR Star Man – Charlie Austin 8 At times in the second half he was dragging his team kicking and screaming through the game. Sandro played well but had to go off, Green played well but conceded a soft goal, Henry deserves credit for a big effort, but this was one of Austin’s best ever all round games, capped off with a fine goal. It’s clear that we’re not only fighting to maintain out top flight status, we’re also playing to keep Austin at Loftus Road. There will be a queue of takers this summer if we go down and he’s playing like this.

Referee: Kevin Friend (Leicestershire) 5 A poor referee, refereeing poorly. Assisted by a linesman who didn’t give anything offside in the first half, and then in the second having presumably been reminded of the rules at half time, couldn’t put his flag down.

Attendance 17,977 (1,800 Arsenal approx) To have tickets unsold for Arsenal at home, in such important circumstances, and the same for Spurs on Saturday has to call into question the prices they’re charging, and the Lower Loft policy. Clearly parents are going to struggle bringing young kids to midweek matches. Clearly when you’re insisting on charging £53 for both matches, the walk ups are going to pick one or the other. Those who could afford it, provided the team with very decent backing.

The Twitter @loftforwords

Pictures – Action Images

Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



062259 added 02:25 - Mar 6
Q: What do you call a team that has conceded two or more goals in 18 out of 27 games?
A: Relegated.
-1

deejay1952 added 02:35 - Mar 6
Your comments about Ozil are unwarranted.. He's not the 'star' player but one of many in a talented midfield. His stats sre more than adequate.
" fourth is your aim and nothing more " is faintly ridiculous. Chelsea have been financialy doping the sport for a decade. Mans*itty are owned by a country. yernited spend vast amounts of money and are heavily in dent. Arsenal live well within their means. Arsenal more than matched yernited prior to abramovich and UAE spending a billion each. not easy to compete. when abramovich bu**er off, the chavs will go back to being average and winning one title every fifty years. Mansh***y will continue to be owned by a country unfortunately. Is it right to say QPR's ambitions are limited to finishing 4th place above the drop zone? survivng beyond the 3rd round of the FA cup?Or are hopes higher until reality sets in. It was a big mistake appointing that tw*t who wasted a lot of the naive chairmans money. Good luck in staying up though. QPR are my second team. If I was rich enough. I'd buy chavski football club, close it down and donate the ground to QPR
-2

QPRinCT added 05:23 - Mar 6
What happened to the pace and aggressiveness that we saw against Sunderland? I guess Fer was a big part of that but still, the Arsenal game was back to lobbing forward to Zamora and Austin.
Also what is the deal with Vargas? Why no minutes for him?
2

Kaos_Agent added 06:05 - Mar 6
Thanks Clive. A damning indictment of Redknapp's watch. We are certainly short of options as a result of his incompetence, but the fact that we stayed on the front foot and neutralized them for long periods is encouraging. In the end Sanchez was the difference. With Dunne and Fer healthy we might have drawn and if Charlie and Matt had been a little more accurate we might have won. Although Henry should have been sent off for his pull-back of Ozil. If someone had done that to Charlie we'd be screaming blue murder.
0

AgedR added 07:45 - Mar 6
How nice to have potential rich benefactor who 'likes' us, hopes we'll stay up and would donate the swamp to us.

With your ticket pricing, wage policy and own set of billionaires, you're part of the problem I'm afraid. Maybe you are the most authentic of the commodity 'Barclays Premier League' clubs in that you don't even pretend to have ambition, but, just keep spewing out 'net profit'.
0

Loft1979 added 08:21 - Mar 6
Clive,.
Superb. Like many internet writers you are under appreciated for the work you do. Both on this site and off. Your synopsis might be biased but i dont think you misrepresent QPR the club or fans in your writing.

1. The meat of this essay is in paragraph 3: 'QPR were badly hamstrung before this match even kicked off': This board has rendered Fer and Sandro incapable after burning them at the stake.....yet the same audience is there to chime in when they are injured/absent, moaning about how their absence hurt us. Fer's absence at the top of center mid, and Sandro's play in front of our back four are pillars to QPR's play. I dont understand why Vargas has not been tried there yet.....

2. 'Charlie Austin hit powerful shots from the edge of the area straight at goalkeeper David Ospina twice in the first 20 minutes - the first a chance of his own making, the second after Bobby Zamora had muscled some time and space for his partner'.
Charlie does not score from range...usually. He has (this year) fed on scraps made by Zamora (as in 2nd chance quoted), Vargas (notably vs Man City), and Fer ( who was our main long range threat). again need Vargas/Adel in that Fer role.

3. 'Karl Henry had been on a par with Sandro when the pair were together, and he battled manfully to do the work of two men when Kranjcar sauntered on –'
I think we both agree here that Henry+Sandro is by far a best case pairing. Henry -Sando (even with JB) is a step down. Concensus proved, Sandro is a huge piece of QPRs team. No wonder Timmy was rejected based on his history with Sandro.

4.' The club’s criminally incompetent transfer policy during the last few years has..."
In fairness, Austin, Caulker, Matty Phillips, Vargas, Isla, Henry, Yun, Fer are hardly signs of incompetence. We signed some GOOD players at the start of the campaign. unfortunately we ARE 1-2 players short. However, how much of that was due to the club targetting that 10M dollar mark on the ledger....and so passing on Diarra, M'Villa, Ayew et al at the deadline?





4.
0

30yarder added 08:31 - Mar 6
All this talk....Sandro went off Kranjcar came on, we lost.
-2

CroydonCaptJack added 09:21 - Mar 6
You just about recovered yourself with that last paragraph deejay1952. Funnily enough I like Arsenal more than most other teams in the Prem but Girouds constant moaning and Rosickys constant diving every time there was the slightest touch on him was disappointing.
1

Tomo_5 added 09:47 - Mar 6
Regardless of the result, which let's admit it isn't a shock considering the oppositions team sheet, I'm enjoying watching Ramsey's "bandaged" teams much more than Redknapps ineffective, slow and meandering dreamers.

It's a blessing Redknapp has moved on. If there was a signing of the January transfer window that we really needed we actually got it, it was 'arry signing for the Toon!!!

If we stay up or go down I fully support the enthusiasm and effort that Chris is putting in, if only we had a manager like him 5 years ago, we certainly wouldn't have the number of "has-beens" that we have now.

Come On You R'sssssssssss......please!
0

Marshy added 10:20 - Mar 6
Thanks Clive I think you have pretty much summed up everything perfectly. The only thing I would add is I think the choice of playing Zamora upfront with Charlie was a mistake. What about either Vargas or Zarate? Either of them would have offered a lot more pace and goal threat. As much as I like Bobby, let's face it he's been a spent force for some time. He can hold up the ball brilliantly, but that's about it as he just doesn't have the fitness or mobility to contribute wholeheartedly. The only way we can survive this season is to score goals, and we can't just keep relying on Charlie.

Just hoping for Spurs that we won't be seeing Hoilett or Kranjcar, but both Vargas and Zarate will be given their chance. Fingers crossed.
1

dixiedean added 10:38 - Mar 6
Agree with Tomo 5 100%. It's not quite " we've got our Rangers back " like after Briatore pissed off, but it feels similar.The game hinged on 2 subs. Firstly Paulista who was very average & being bullied by BZ; Koscielny was in a different class and won every header. Secondly the obvious one. Even " expert summariser" Robbie Savage might be able to work out that our midfield just melted away when Niko came on and flitted about to no effect. At one stage I hoped Arsenal would declare at 2-0 as it could have been a demoralising 5-0 hammering. Up until Sandro went off I was nervously looking at Arsenal's high quality bench, dreading which one of Walcott/Ox/Welbeck was going to come on and change the game but in the end it wasn't necessary as Niko did the job for them. I felt sorry for Furlong- he was left very exposed against a guy of Sanchez' class but otherwise did well. These days any full-back is entitled to have someone double up on his winger, never mind a young lad making his way. Problem is after 55 mins there were so many holes we just couldn't plug them all- it was like playing with 10 men. Gaz Ainsworth was sitting behind us in Upper Loft and it was good to see him and have a chat. Top bloke. Hopefully Walker & Townsend will get a good reception tomorrow. Andros' first game back since leaving ? Really need to put the heat on Villa and their arrogant manager- so glad we didn't get him and would love to see him take the down. But if any more keepers hand them points like Foster did, we might as well give up- Scandalous Couldn't stand Sherwood as a player and he's not lost that demeanour as a manager.
0

Juzzie added 11:46 - Mar 6
I kind of understand where deejay1952 is coming from. Arsenal I'm sure would love to win the title, regularly. However, they are one of the better run clubs and because they don't do what Chelsea, Man City and, slightly less, Man Utd do it means that 4th is probably the best they, or anyone else, can manage rather than what they aspire to.

FFP is meant to stop sugar daddies buying titles so that means that could dent Chelsea in future and Man City too. However, this IMO will just mean the PL title could be an annual two-horse race with Man Utd and Arsenal and that in itself would be counter-productive.

Solution? No idea! Do we allow clubs to be heavily backed and it just means the richest win or do we curb this and only allow clubs to spend within thier means meaning it'll just be one or two clubs winning it all the time?

What a mess.

0

HastingsRanger added 18:13 - Mar 6
Clive, great report again.

To see R's playing and fighting back for the ball in the first half was really encouraging. Tactically, I thought they played well until the Sandro substitution. After that, the midfield was exposed. And the belief disappeared for quite a while after the 1st goal. A sign of a team in trouble.

Even so, some individual performances were outstanding - especially the work rate of Austin, Sandro and Henry (he who could not hold a place last season!) .

I would like to know the future of Vargas, since he did not figure once more. Again, I question what SWP is on the bench for, just don't get it.

I guess I am misguided but on another day, we might have nicked a draw.
0

tomers added 21:37 - Mar 6
£58.50 is too much!

I can't really afford to go to games. I've got a family and time and money are always an issue for me at the moment. But I have to go occasionally to keep me sane and feed my life long passion. I paid £55 for a ticket in the upper loft + £3.50 booking charge. It's too much. I can't justify it.

It was a great atmosphere though - night games under the floodlights at Loftus Road can be something special. Shame about the result of course.

Having said that, I have got tickets for Palace away which cost £40 (+ that bleedin' booking fee). And I noticed a small piece in the Standard about Palace fans not going/boycotting an away match cause tickets for away supporters were £40 odd. Think it was West Ham. Funny that.

Anyway, I'm at least happy with the new direction the club seem to be taking with Ramsey, Furlong and Doughty and maybe it's given the place a lift.
0

TacticalR added 14:11 - Mar 7
Thanks for your report.

As you said, we wilted when Arsenal's possession football eventually ground us down. Arsenal are a good team, and certainly not one we should expect to beat automatically. In fact the only way we are going to beat a team like that is to have eleven fit players on top form.

I agree that a number of players who are not first choice are getting a game.

Given that Furlong was up against one of the top players in the world, he actually coped pretty well, but it wasn't a fair match.

I am normally pro-Kranjčar but he looked horribly out of sorts. You can't play against a fast, skillful side if you are neither fast nor skillful. Kranjčar normally makes up for lack of speed with skill, but on this occasion he lacked both speed and skill. He is probably better against less skillful sides lower down the table.

At least Charlie gave us a consolation goal.
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

When Saturday Comes #14 by wessex_exile

Queens Park Rangers Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2021