By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
I supported it in the case of Julian assange. Will be interesting to see how it pans out with this American woman and if their government puts pressure on her. Will be out of order if they don’t considering trumps rhetoric on criminals crossing their southern border.
0
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 22:32 - Oct 7 with 1026 views
Yes of course it should, it's necessary for diplomacy to work effectively. Just like the law the rules shouldn't be changed because of one infringement.
0
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 23:22 - Oct 7 with 1002 views
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 20:40 - Oct 7 by Thacks_Rabbits
Good poll James!
It’s an out of date process that took the basic assumption that all diplomats are decent people. It has been used for years for politicians from corrupt countries to take massive amounts of cash into other countries, smuggle weapons, committ fraud etc. Also they can be issued to non-diplomats on the grounds they are assisting governments, embassies etc
The system needs an overhaul but it wont happen
1
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 14:11 - Oct 8 with 835 views
Without it MI5 & MI6 would struggle to get operatives to take foreign assignments. Now wether those organisations are view as in the public interest or not is a different story. If you are talking about eavesdropping on conversations of foreign governments is one thing. Penetrating terrorist and fundamentalist groups is another. If you are throwing people into those situations to protect your country’s interest you have to give them a guaranteed exit card.
1
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 21:04 - Oct 8 with 724 views
Should diplomatic immunity still exist on 14:11 - Oct 8 by jonahwhereru
Without it MI5 & MI6 would struggle to get operatives to take foreign assignments. Now wether those organisations are view as in the public interest or not is a different story. If you are talking about eavesdropping on conversations of foreign governments is one thing. Penetrating terrorist and fundamentalist groups is another. If you are throwing people into those situations to protect your country’s interest you have to give them a guaranteed exit card.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
