| The beeb on 12:24 - Nov 8 with 3143 views | D_Alien |
Our favourite pretend-journo has been at it again
Anyone checking the BBC Football main page yesterday evening might've noticed an article headed:
"Why Manchester United Are Sticking With Solskjaer"
I didn't read it, dismissing it as the usual speculation. Didn't notice who wrote it
Today, the header has been amended to:
"Manchester United: The reasons why Solskjaer may keep his job after derby defeat"
Notice the "may". A quick check (again without reading it) revealed it was another construct of Simon Stone. I wonder who made him amend the article this time? And what else has been amended?
Will the BBC ever learn? The guy is a total liability to them, and sooner or later they (we the licence payers) will end up paying for it |  |
|  |
| The beeb on 14:40 - Nov 8 with 2880 views | Sandyman |
| The beeb on 12:24 - Nov 8 by D_Alien |
Our favourite pretend-journo has been at it again
Anyone checking the BBC Football main page yesterday evening might've noticed an article headed:
"Why Manchester United Are Sticking With Solskjaer"
I didn't read it, dismissing it as the usual speculation. Didn't notice who wrote it
Today, the header has been amended to:
"Manchester United: The reasons why Solskjaer may keep his job after derby defeat"
Notice the "may". A quick check (again without reading it) revealed it was another construct of Simon Stone. I wonder who made him amend the article this time? And what else has been amended?
Will the BBC ever learn? The guy is a total liability to them, and sooner or later they (we the licence payers) will end up paying for it |
Looking at the article this afternoon, the header is "Why Man Utd could stick with Solskjaer". The article itself is headed "Manchester United: Ole Gunnar Solskjaer could keep job despite derby defeat". It's "could" now. Likewise, CBA reading it. |  | | |
| The beeb on 07:36 - Nov 21 with 2448 views | Sandyman |
| The beeb on 12:24 - Nov 8 by D_Alien |
Our favourite pretend-journo has been at it again
Anyone checking the BBC Football main page yesterday evening might've noticed an article headed:
"Why Manchester United Are Sticking With Solskjaer"
I didn't read it, dismissing it as the usual speculation. Didn't notice who wrote it
Today, the header has been amended to:
"Manchester United: The reasons why Solskjaer may keep his job after derby defeat"
Notice the "may". A quick check (again without reading it) revealed it was another construct of Simon Stone. I wonder who made him amend the article this time? And what else has been amended?
Will the BBC ever learn? The guy is a total liability to them, and sooner or later they (we the licence payers) will end up paying for it |
Look what Simon Stone is saying this morning!
"Ole Gunnar Solskjaer: Manchester United boss set to leave club after Watford defeat"
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/59364319 | | | |
| The beeb on 08:38 - Nov 21 with 2350 views | D_Alien |
Aye, he'll likely get it right at the fourth or fifth attempt
In other news, it's likely to get a bit cold out as we approach winter | |
| |
| The beeb on 10:45 - Nov 21 with 2168 views | funkkk |
Jesus, nobody holds a grudge quite like the folk on this message board 😂 |  | | |
| The beeb on 10:49 - Nov 21 with 2154 views | blackdogblue |
He was right though.. |  |
| |
| The beeb on 11:48 - Nov 21 with 2066 views | D_Alien |
| The beeb on 10:45 - Nov 21 by funkkk |
Jesus, nobody holds a grudge quite like the folk on this message board 😂 |
I've no doubt you've acquired herd immunity to shit journalism | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| The beeb on 21:33 - Jul 24 with 1121 views | D_Alien |
Tbf, making him field questions about Villa reserves is a suitable punishment by his bosses for the almighty cock-ups he's made in the past twelve months | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
