By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
As supporters I think we've every right to ask this question and receive an answer from the club - who made the decision to give Keith Hill a five-year contract?
Almost all decisions emanate from a single person, whether accredited to 'the board' or 'the club' etc. So, who was it?
It is the single worst decision made in the last 20 years of Rochdale AFC. It has left us unable to afford to sack him while meaning we suffer a hemorrhage of fans and finances due to his shocking player acquisition, tactics and man-management.
Who knows the long-term damage.
0
Who made the decision? on 17:16 - Mar 2 with 4566 views
Genuine question to the Hill lovers, what is your man doing at the moment to maintain your manlove? His weird team selections continue and the slump deepens.
Genuine question to the Hill lovers, what is your man doing at the moment to maintain your manlove? His weird team selections continue and the slump deepens.
Really don’t think creating issues amongst ourselves is going to help. I totally appreciate this works both ways.
The subject is valid but it could be asked in a different way. Just an opinion of course.
The reaction on here/Twitter/around the ground at the time made it pretty clear what the general consensus was.
Very few post on Twitter, or really on here, and there were plenty around where I sit, and amongst others I know who questioned the decision, but most were happy to keep quiet and trust the Club.
Any man who walks out on a club should never be allowed back regardless of how successful he has been in the past as he has shown no loyalty. The fact that he is now prepared to put the club in to league 2 for the sake of money proves his lack of loyalty. To him, it's just a job. To us, it's our club where we were before Hill came and we will still be after he goes.
-4
Who made the decision? on 19:46 - Mar 2 with 3712 views
Any man who walks out on a club should never be allowed back regardless of how successful he has been in the past as he has shown no loyalty. The fact that he is now prepared to put the club in to league 2 for the sake of money proves his lack of loyalty. To him, it's just a job. To us, it's our club where we were before Hill came and we will still be after he goes.
You said you weren’t renewing your season ticket (the one that gives you your exclusive seat) last week. Make your mind up.
3
Who made the decision? on 19:53 - Mar 2 with 3682 views
Any man who walks out on a club should never be allowed back regardless of how successful he has been in the past as he has shown no loyalty. The fact that he is now prepared to put the club in to league 2 for the sake of money proves his lack of loyalty. To him, it's just a job. To us, it's our club where we were before Hill came and we will still be after he goes.
Any man that wouldn’t take the opportunity to better himself and take a challenge would be an idiot. Like you say, it’s just a job to him, loyalty doesn’t come into it. I remember at the time of the news of his five year contract was announced, there was a forum very soon after which Hill attended and was greeted with pretty much with unanimous applause, it seemed to me a decent deal for both parties at the time, but a lot of my mates and other people I know had deep reservations and reckoned it was a massive gamble that could easily go tits up. As others have said, it’s pretty irrelevant who made the decision.
1
Who made the decision? on 20:00 - Mar 2 with 3636 views
Any man who walks out on a club should never be allowed back regardless of how successful he has been in the past as he has shown no loyalty. The fact that he is now prepared to put the club in to league 2 for the sake of money proves his lack of loyalty. To him, it's just a job. To us, it's our club where we were before Hill came and we will still be after he goes.
To be still banging that 'disloyal' drum after all these years is ridiculous. It was pathetic at the time, it's even worse to rake it all up, just to beat him with it again.
“It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooledâ€
0
Who made the decision? on 20:39 - Mar 2 with 3485 views
Other than the contract being 5 years and he may or not get a cut of transfer deals. Apart from the ITKers do any of us know the full ins and outs of the deal? Surely the contract negotiations were not all one sided. I wouldn't be surprised if the target is 20th or above in league 1 come the end of each season. As we have not reached the end of the season perhaps this is one of the reasons why the board are sticking with KH.
'Only happy when you've got it often makes you miss the journey'
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
