| James Bree - Our man on the inside 16:38 - Feb 16 with 794 views | PJK1972 |
Firstly does anyone know if Bree can play in the up and coming fixture with Charlton? I'm not sure on the rules about a recalled loaned player then playing against his loaned club on return to the parent club.
I'm sure he'll have a few insights on how to beat Charlton, which may prove useful, especially if he is allowed on the pitch.
I think he's made that right back spot his own and I've been very impressed with his form on return from The Addicks. I certainly didn't know he could score with headers :) |  |
| |  |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 17:44 - Feb 16 with 722 views | 1ASIN12 |
Why wouldn’t he be able to play ? Hes our player ? |  | | |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 17:56 - Feb 16 with 704 views | shotters |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 17:44 - Feb 16 by 1ASIN12 |
Why wouldn’t he be able to play ? Hes our player ? |
His loan ended in mid January so I'm pretty sure he will play |  |
| Fail we may, sail we must |
| |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 18:45 - Feb 16 with 640 views | 1885_SFC |
Didn't they do away with players being cup tied rule...or did I dream that? |  |
| GET THE F*CK OUT OF THIS FOOTBALL CLUB SPORT REPUBLIC |
| |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 19:04 - Feb 16 with 614 views | Ifonly |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 18:45 - Feb 16 by 1885_SFC |
Didn't they do away with players being cup tied rule...or did I dream that? |
Blimey, sounds like you have some exciting dreams. But yeah, this is the key thing. Last year a returning loanee couldn't play for their parent club if they've already played in earlier rounds, but this year they can. | | | |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 19:11 - Feb 16 with 597 views | kingslandstand1 |
Strange how he wa previously lambasted, but now it's a let's hope he can play for us!  
But yes, he was previously played out of position some times |  |
| |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 19:28 - Feb 16 with 585 views | shotters |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 19:11 - Feb 16 by kingslandstand1 |
Strange how he wa previously lambasted, but now it's a let's hope he can play for us!
But yes, he was previously played out of position some times |
Was he lambasted?
Unfortunately for him he was signed by Jones who was already on borrowed time
When we got relegated we still had Walker-Peters who was always going to be first choice, I seem to remember him switching to left back because Manning was a liability at the time and he only lost his place when he got injured away at QPR
He's obviously a good pro as he come back from his loan with no fuss and gone straight back into the team. Makes the signing of two replacements seem rather foolish but maybe he wanted out in the summer when we had Still in charge? | |
| Fail we may, sail we must |
| |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 13:06 - Feb 17 with 332 views | sledger |
doesnt seem the sort to make a fuss just a solid pro who gives his best to whoever is paying him and is now probably the first name on the team sheet.Pound for pound the best value signing saints have made in many a year wasnt it about 400,000 from luton. | | | |
| James Bree - Our man on the inside on 17:47 - Feb 17 with 241 views | Monksway |
I'm guessing but perhaps by the end of the transfer window they'd already decided to go three at the back with wing backs and brought Jelert into that role alongside Frazer and Fellows. Roedslev was signed to replace Sugawara and was probably expected to be first choice as a more traditional right back. Seems a lot of decisions came from the desire to play Armstrong upfront given how ineffective Downs was and unreliable Stewart's fitness. One of the explanations for Armstrong's departure was that he didn't fit into Eckert's plans going forwards and Eckert' is clearly happier with the current structure and balance of the squad. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
