Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Media Frenzy has Blown Up Spygate Out Of All Proportions
Friday, 15th May 2026 09:41

The old adage lets not get facts get in the way of the truth, is perhaps very apt in Spygate, the Teesside media started it off and then it seemed to whole country joined in, blowing up what is quite an innocuous rule breach in the grand scheme of things, into the most serious offence ever !

Up to fairy recently you could go and watch professional football teams train, I remember back in 2000 going to Staplewood one morning to watch Saints, I joined a small collection of retirees who seemed to do this quite regularly, there was not a lot to be learned and the only day you couldn't go and watch was Friday morning.

At one stage a training game was stopped and one of the coaches stopped and asked a member of the crowd whether he thought a foul had been committed and I had an in depth conversation with then manager Glenn Hoddle on the walk back from the training pitch.

Then things started to get a bit more serious, football clubs got paranoid that the opposition might get a whiff of a new throw in tactic or the part of the shin they were going to wear their shin pads on for the following game and so Staplewood went into lockdown and so did plenty of other Premier League training grounds, or as they were now being rebranded, complexes, academy's or in Bournemouth's case Performance Centres.

Outside of the Premier League, most other clubs continue to train in fairly open facilities, some use facilities they don't own such as the local university etc.

Middlesbrough themselves do not train in an enclosed facility, their training complex is within a bigger site that also contains a luxury hotel and a golf course and club house.

As long as you book a round of golf or night in the hotel, you can get on to the site and walk down roads that give you a view of the Middlesbrough FC training pitches and I mean a view, not a close view just a view.

When Spygate broke the allegations that came out, now bear no resemblance to the actual facts of the matter, an employee of Southampton FC had been caught hiding in the bushes with highly technical recording equipment filming Boro's first team training.

The image being projected was of a covert operation where the culprit was hid in bushes just yards from the training pitches.

The actual facts are far from that image the Teesside media wished to project.

Firstly the man was not an employee of Southampton football club, he had been involved with the club at one point, but he was actually a student studying a degree in Sports Analysis, he had spent time at Saints as an intern as part of a placement from his course, but he had also spent time at Derby County and other sporting institutions and since March has been at Aston Villa.

So fact number one is that he was not an employee of Southampton Football Club.

Fact number two is that he was not in the bushes with sophisticated technical equipment, he did not trespass on the property, he did not hide his identity, he had booked into the hotel and by all accounts after the incident bought a cup of coffee using his personal debit card.

His actual position was that he was stood on an open road, next to a gate that said, Private Property do not enter. He did not enter, instead he stood by a tree next to the gate.

He was around 200 metres from the actual training pitches themselves with an i phone in hand and more to the point he was in clear sight from the Middlesbrough FC club house for want of a better word.

They soon spotted him and came over to find out what he was doing.

The answer was not a lot and I would suspect that this was far from the first time that they had had to challenge someone here.

But now it is blurred, initially the Teesside media claimed that his identity had been seen and that footage he had taken had been deleted, now they claim he ran for it back to the hotel or Golf clubhouse and tried to disguise himself by changing clothes in a toilet.

There are also claims by Boro that he then ran across the gold course to make his escape, this also sounds a bit strange, did he leave his personal belongings in his room, or perhaps in his car if he had on, which presumably is still in the car park.

The next question is just what he was trying to achieve, perhaps the only thing would have been that they intended to stop Cyle Larin by continually pulling his shirt at every opportunity.

If he was genuinely on a mission from Southampton FC, surely there are far better ways to view a training session than from 200 metres away with an i phone.

What would be the odds of watching the session for say 2 hours and not being seen, what would be the chances that in the short time you were stood there, you would actually capture any information that would be of use.

Middlesbrough might be a lot more open than most training grounds, but they do have CCTV & security, if you were genuinely on a covert operation, you would not do it this way.

I don't know the exact lay out of the complex, but surely if we were looking to film a training session, then we would have sneaked on the ground from a quiet area of the woods etc surrounding the complex and hidden in the woods or bushes a bit nearer the training pitches.

But lets be honest training complex's have security staff and cctv, it would still be very difficult to get away with.

A couple of days before this broke I watched the video below on You Tube taken by a drone at Staplewood, very interesting and by a Saints supporter wanting to show off the size and scale of the training ground.

The point here is that if Saints wanted to find out what Middlesbrough was doing, then it would have been easy enough for them to have used a drone themselves, if we are serial training session watchers, then surely we would have been doing this for ages and on this occasion.

A drone would be far more sophisticated than an I phone and would get a better view of proceedings that could then be enhanced and studied.

More to the point it could have been launched remotely from the training ground itself, it would have been hard to find who and where it was launched from.

All of this is a little strange but as I say lets not let facts get in the way of the truth.

Will Salt is the former Intern named as the spy, so why would be be watching the training session, that is actually an easy answer it is all part of his studies, he has been on placements, but there is more to just the course itself, there is homework to do.

So he has a reasonable excuse for wanting to take a look at a training session and I would imagine that most football fans if they were staying at the hotel would have wandered the short distance to have a look at the team training, they would take a picture on their phone to show their mates, probably a couple for no other reason than because that is what football fans do, let alone those studying for a degree in Sports Analysis.

The only real question here is why when he is an intern at Aston Villa at present he was up in the North East, but there may be a good reason for that other than football.

But the main question is just what Saints could gain from this, had they heard word that Kim Hellberg was on the brink of a breakthrough in team tactics, a tactic never seen or thought up before, that he was about to turn the footballing world upside down by revealing this against Southampton on Saturday and in doing so propel himself up the rankings of World Football coaches from the lower reaches to the top 3 ?

I think we all know the answer to that one, there are only so many ways you can line up your side to take a free kick or a corner and once you have done it once in the match, then the opposition know what you are doing.

The actual truth is, that despite what a plethora of ex professionals are lining up to tell you in the media, there is little to be gained than what is already known.

The outcry here is totally out of proportion to the facts of the matter, if they had found an SAS squad in the woods with sophisticated monitoring equipment, then perhaps they might have had a case, but they didn't !

It was a former Southampton intern with an i phone hardly hiding himself from CCTV or security, it is something out of nothing with the flames fanned by Hellberg himself a man who took over the job with the team in second place and gained only 19 points in the last 15 games of the season to finish 5th.

That suggests his job is in jeopardy, lose to Southampton in the play offs and it didn't take a genius to put two and two together and in this day and age suggest that there is a good chance he won't be manager at the start of next season.

So he was a desperate man and he went to desperate measures, do everything to try and mess with our own preparations, put doubt into our minds.

From a Southampton FC perspective, we have done the right thing, we haven't made brash claims, we haven't tried to distort the evidence or influence it, we have kept our own counsel, perhaps in the confidence that the truth will eventually emerge and that has already seemed to be the case, the facts of the matter are now seemingly far far different than Middlesbrough originally briefed the Teesside media and there is no excuse for that.
Then to the offence itself, the precedent was set back when Bielsa was manager of Leeds and they were caught spying on a training session, yes that was under a different ruling, but that was only changed because the EFL wanted a specific rule for the offence.

The nature of the offence remains the same and if Leeds were fined £200,000, then if Southampton were to be found guilty, then the punishment should be in proportion to the crime and the precedent is that £200k that Leeds were fined.

A lot of hot air on Teesside is demanding Saints to be kicked out of the competition etc etc, but I don't think that is in proportion to the crime.

Middlesbrough will say that it was an important play off game, but that is not relevant, if you were given a red card in an end of season game between two mid table clubs with nothing to play for, then you might get a 3 game ban, if you committed the same offence in a top of the table clash, you would receive exactly the same.

The question asked is going to be what could be gained and was gained from the offence if found guilty and that is fairly minimal in the grand scheme of things.

All Photos Via Reuters



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



SanMarco added 09:59 - May 15
I hope this is all true Nick - not questioning your honesty of course but true info is hard to find in these post-truth days. Is this direct from the club?

If these are the facts then Saints are guilty of nothing and Middlesbrough are guilty of lots.

My question though is why, if these are the facts, have Saints been charged? And secondly, why have the club not simply stated the truth?

I really hope all this is true. If it is then I know who deserves a big fine!
2

Bawdrip added 10:09 - May 15
Yes there has been a frenzy in the press and on social media. This is a good calm response to it. Hopefully the panel will be equally calm and not pressurised to act on the basis of the media.
2

SaintNick added 10:19 - May 15
I should point out that I have had no information from the club, I have just assessed the information out there and what has been said.

2

DorsetIan added 10:25 - May 15
You complain of a media frenzy and I agree that the hand-wringing when people don't know the facts has been spectacular.

But tbh you don't know the facts either, so I wonder whether you are simply adding to the 'media' free-for-all.

Questions that the EFL will hopefully answer, are:

1. What was William Salt doing?
2. Was he doing it on the instruction of someone at Saints FC.

If the answers to these questions are: nothing underhand or no, then nothing to see here.

But if the answers are: quite a bit, and because someone at Saints asked him to, then it gets messier.

But let's maybe wait to get some clear answers to these questions before getting too excited either way.

If someone at the Club has directed Salt to break the rules on spying then I would guess the next question will be who did that and who else at the Club knew about it. The owners will want to protect the reputation of the Club and may want to distance themselves from/make an example of the instigator to do that.

Let's hope Tonda was not involved in any way.

2

Kingsland34 added 10:31 - May 15
There are some very illuminating aspects in your post. Boro have been constructing 'evidence' all along and also looked to distastefully add misplaced grievances from Tuesday to their portfolio. They are seeking re-instatement at our expense which is the last sanction the EFL should ever consider and one that would be highly challengeable by Saints. If we were to be banned then the EFL should give a bye to Hull.
Hopefully the Panel will have sound neutral minds and outlooks that see past all the media bluster.
4

ronniedavies added 10:37 - May 15
Well written Nick, these researched facts convince me that Boro don’t have a leg to stand on but we await the outcome. Time to get our tickets sorted.
4

highfield49 added 11:23 - May 15
If SFC are exonerated from blame by the enquiry and Middlesbrough shown to have concocted their narrative then Middlesbrough's code of conduct should also be questioned.
The reputation of SFC and it's supporters has been tarnished by these accusations and Middlesbrough, if seen to be seeking advantage themselves from the accusations, should at the very least publish a full retraction and apology. Defamation litigation could even be winging it's way to the north east depending on the outcome next week.
Sadly the whole matter has probably caused more damage to our club and sponsors than anyone of us could have anticipated.
2

SaintPaulVW added 11:26 - May 15
It's a shame all this has blown up in the silly season - post the end of the league and pre world cup. Saints are clearly following the royal's method of dealing with accusations in the press- say nothing and wait for the press to move onto other stories.

If the widely reported facts above are correct, Boro have clearly blown everything up for mind games. Unless there was any contact between the intern and Saints then I'm not sure what case there is to answer.

I just hope all the Boro fans see sense and just move on. A sense of grievance after playing well but being beaten over two legs just isn't worth it.

Struggling to see that we won't be at Wembley on Saturday week.

1

AJDubYa added 11:27 - May 15
I saw William Salt's profile was on LinkedIn ... originally .... but checking today, it seems to have been taken down/removed!
Where are you getting his work information from @Nick? That he's now at Aston Villa?? If so, this is all redundant then! And would also explain him not being in the more recent Manager of the Month photos ....!
1

OoohTerryHurlock added 12:18 - May 15
Ladies and Gentlemen…..If you Google ‘William Salt Derby University’ you can read all about him. Including him saying that he is now at Aston Villa.
3

StEdmund added 12:19 - May 15
Excellent assessment. Hopefully the Disciplinary Committee will see sense - no guarantee of course.

Perhaps we need to employ James Bond in future and deal with the real arch-villain, Hellberg, soon ex-manager
1

Bowlercow added 12:21 - May 15
Thanks Nick.I hope and pray that your report is accurate If it is I expect the media,like the daily fail for example,to publish massive retraction.
Mind you I think Nelson has more chance of getting his eye backj
2

gpgsm added 12:33 - May 15
The article quoted by OohTerryHurlock is from what I can see dated 27 Jan 2025
I’ve heard he has been working with us recently
1

AJDubYa added 12:46 - May 15
@OoohTerryHurlock - someone (SFC fan) on X is stating that Will Salt WAS at Aston Villa, but returned to Saints in the summer.
All other info on this lad appears to have been wiped from the Web!! Hmmmmmm
0

SanMarco added 12:51 - May 15
Salt is the Lee Harvey Oswald of all this. If he is really now at Villa why are Saints not denying the charge? The mood music has been that the Saints accept the basics of the charge - or is that nonsense too?

The Echo is reporting that M'boro's request to be involved with the hearing has been rejected and they will thus NOT be able to appeal the verdict. I hope that's true because it sounds like good news...
1

GRIM added 13:09 - May 15
Nick, your post is well constructed but pure Supposition. !
Like the rest of us you don't know the facts & what you've put together is just your opinion of the events.
We could all consider the information that's been made public & come up with a different outcome.
We don't know is the full extent the situation regarding William Salt.
Is he a an employee or was he at the time of the so called event.
This is what will be decided on Tuesday.
But I would like to know is will Salt be attending that Investigation on Tuesday.
The outcome really does depend on what he has to say about it.
Best we all take a deep breath, relax & what until Tuesdsy.
0

WestSussexSaint added 13:16 - May 15
There are a number of elements that are irrelevant in connection with the charge of observing or recording an opponents training session within 72hrs of a match. Whether Will Salt was on public or private land (or in a helicopter for that matter) is irrelevant. Whether he had an iPhone or state of the art equipment is irrelevant. What he (or indeed Saints) gained from the act is irrelevant.

The one aspect that I think is interesting is whether Salt was there on behalf of and/or with the knowledge of Southampton FC. If, as speculated, his ties with the club had ended earlier this year and his presence was for personal use on his course or for Aston Villa then the charges must be thrown out. However, while Saints haven’t accepted the charge they haven’t denied it either. I would have thought this fundamental information would have prompted a full rebuttal by the club if there was no connection between Salt and the Saints.

While Saints should have some credit for keeping their own counsel and allow the process to play out in private, the lack of a rebuttal or any material comment from Saints has allowed Middlesbrough to fill the vacuum in the public arena. In doing so it feels like Saints have already be tried and found guilty in the court of public opinion. I think in turn this has put pressure on the EFL to put out unhelpful statements like yesterday saying their is no guarantee that the playoff final will go ahead, despite allowing ticket sales and there being no realistic alternative date. Most observers not in the Saints camp have taken that to mean Saints are guilty and there is potential for a very severe punishment.

It’s worth noting that Saints have also been charged with not treating an opponent with good faith. This was the charge against Leeds a few years ago because the 72hr rule didn’t exist. The media storm that Middlesbrough have whipped up over the last few days could easily be deemed as breaching the same charge if the evidence does not show Saints are guilty.

And as Nessa would say “Oh! James. Shut your mouth on things that don’t concern you!”
3

Stevebish added 14:04 - May 15
I think this can go either way, if Saints did this then we should get sanctions I just don't think kicking us out would be fair and would be going way to far and the club staying silent just looks like we knew we did this so just don't say anything. If we didn't do it then hopefully this will go away very quickly and as you say there will be a lot of people who should apologise , then Saints silence actually looks very good in that they have added to the situation and have acted in good faith we can only hope that it is ok for us
2

AJDubYa added 16:07 - May 15
In addition, Boro just released a statement basically demanding Saints are kicked out of the Play Off Final .... ummmm .... isn't that "trying to influence the outcome" of an investigation .... perhaps they should just be quiet now and let it run its course! Also, lets not forget the GDPR infraction of the Hotel releasing the name of a card transaction to the Club !! Maybe they should get charged too!
2

ItchenNorth added 18:08 - May 15
Trial by media and Boro are happy to play that game.
2

DoctorSleep added 18:40 - May 15
So looking forward to Boro being hit with a disrepute or good faith charge. There latest outburst is trying to influence the panel ahead of Tuesday just like an imaginary card being waved at the referee.

But of course the EFL will bottle it and do nothing.
Should we stay in the Championship ( hopefully not ) there is going to be some 'bad blood' between the two clubs next season. Not an away game I shall be attending!
2

Donola added 19:32 - May 15
https://www.derby.ac.uk/underg

This article was updated in January this year, Yet we know He was at Saints in march, from the Manager of the month Photo.
So it appears that he May have possibly returned to Southampton after a spell with Villa??
1

YosemiteSaint added 22:57 - May 15
Thanks, Nick, for this piece. It's helped reset my sights—which is invaluable for someone as guilt-prone as i am. This whole thing is indeed ridiculous.
2

wibbersda added 13:25 - May 16
Somebody please tell me this. If this was happening and caught during the season would we be kicked out of the championship? I would say not, so kicked out of the playoffs seems massively disproportionate does it not? Its trial by media, and the worst type of media at that!
1


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

Southampton Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026