| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:30 - Apr 10 with 3224 views | monmouth |
If Leviein really did ask the Trust if they wanted to sell in March and got no response, then how can there be any legal grounds for anything subsequent to that? If it's a lie though, why didn't the Trust members present contradict him. What am I missing here? |  |
|  |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:43 - Apr 10 with 3188 views | PURe_Evil |
Pretty much explains why there has been no legal action. |  | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:45 - Apr 10 with 3163 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:30 - Apr 10 by monmouth |
If Leviein really did ask the Trust if they wanted to sell in March and got no response, then how can there be any legal grounds for anything subsequent to that? If it's a lie though, why didn't the Trust members present contradict him. What am I missing here? |
Did they actually say that in the Forum last week? Or did they just say they'd met with the Trust in March? [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:06]
|  |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:50 - Apr 10 with 3155 views | NeathJack |
There's a huge distinction between asking someone if they would be interested in selling and actually making an offer for the shares. |  | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:53 - Apr 10 with 3146 views | Landore_Jack |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:45 - Apr 10 by Darran |
Did they actually say that in the Forum last week? Or did they just say they'd met with the Trust in March? [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:06]
|
JL never said "he received no response from the Trust." He admitted to enquiring about purchasing the shares. |  |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:59 - Apr 10 with 3098 views | Vetchfielder |
This is very suspicious.
There is an almost identical report on the BBC Wales Sport website, the same quotes being used from Levien and "a club spokesman".
It's as if the club has issued this like a press release to both BBC and Walesonline - it can't be a coincidence that they were both published today, 6 days after the Trust Forum- maybe starting the charm offensive and getting their retaliation in first. [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:01]
|  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:01 - Apr 10 with 3083 views | PURe_Evil |
The Trust need to come out and deny this. | | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:02 - Apr 10 with 3072 views | PURe_Evil |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:50 - Apr 10 by NeathJack |
There's a huge distinction between asking someone if they would be interested in selling and actually making an offer for the shares. |
Not if the other party doesn't respond. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:08 - Apr 10 with 3020 views | TheResurrection |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:59 - Apr 10 by Vetchfielder |
This is very suspicious.
There is an almost identical report on the BBC Wales Sport website, the same quotes being used from Levien and "a club spokesman".
It's as if the club has issued this like a press release to both BBC and Walesonline - it can't be a coincidence that they were both published today, 6 days after the Trust Forum- maybe starting the charm offensive and getting their retaliation in first. [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:01]
|
Who cares about that?
From March to July and no response from the Trust and nothing relayed to the Trust members?
Why? |  |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:10 - Apr 10 with 2989 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:08 - Apr 10 by TheResurrection |
Who cares about that?
From March to July and no response from the Trust and nothing relayed to the Trust members?
Why? |
If it's true see Chrissy. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:15 - Apr 10 with 2982 views | Vetchfielder |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:08 - Apr 10 by TheResurrection |
Who cares about that?
From March to July and no response from the Trust and nothing relayed to the Trust members?
Why? |
Well, right now, we don't know whether it's true or not | |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:17 - Apr 10 with 2967 views | morningstar |
So basically, the yanks heard rumblings of an agreement between the current parties, asked to see the documentation, but proceeded anyway without it, and when they find out the selling shareholders were actually deceitful lying untrustworthy c****s (sorry Lorraine), continue to back them as chairman and vice chairman of our football club. Ye ok! 
No doubt some of you will view it differently, but that's where i'm at. |  |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:26 - Apr 10 with 2920 views | TheResurrection |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:10 - Apr 10 by Darran |
If it's true see Chrissy. |
It would throw your little campaign off course a bit, wouldn't it?
There were discussions before the sale. In fact, even a suggestion from the Americans on what the Trust should do with the money if they did sell i.e. reinvest it the playing squad, to which the Trust said if they did decide to sell it would be up to them to choose what to do with the money.
Over to you? [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:27]
| |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:32 - Apr 10 with 2864 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:26 - Apr 10 by TheResurrection |
It would throw your little campaign off course a bit, wouldn't it?
There were discussions before the sale. In fact, even a suggestion from the Americans on what the Trust should do with the money if they did sell i.e. reinvest it the playing squad, to which the Trust said if they did decide to sell it would be up to them to choose what to do with the money.
Over to you? [Post edited 10 Apr 2017 20:27]
|
My campaign?
Where did that suggestion come from then?
It's strange though you're all over this again and you've still got nothing to say about the Yanks dropping Mr Dineen and Mr Jenkins right in it last week. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:38 - Apr 10 with 2826 views | costalotta |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 19:50 - Apr 10 by NeathJack |
There's a huge distinction between asking someone if they would be interested in selling and actually making an offer for the shares. |
Of course there is...
Did the Americans only want 68% ?
Maybe the Americans didn't care whom from the existing shareholders they acquired the 68% from. If the Trust were to sell shares there would less to spread around the likes of HJ, MM, LD et al as collectively they'd be selling less shares as the Trust had liquified theirs. For sure this wouldn't suit the old board so could that be a factor.
Or perhaps the Trust didn't want to sell up
Very suspicious either way. |  | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:39 - Apr 10 with 2798 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:38 - Apr 10 by costalotta |
Of course there is...
Did the Americans only want 68% ?
Maybe the Americans didn't care whom from the existing shareholders they acquired the 68% from. If the Trust were to sell shares there would less to spread around the likes of HJ, MM, LD et al as collectively they'd be selling less shares as the Trust had liquified theirs. For sure this wouldn't suit the old board so could that be a factor.
Or perhaps the Trust didn't want to sell up
Very suspicious either way. |
Yes it is. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:41 - Apr 10 with 2775 views | Darran |
Well I'm told the Yanks made NO offer for the Trusts shares. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:42 - Apr 10 with 2785 views | Martyrman57 |
It would be nice for any comment from the Trust on all this. Little wonder supporters are not interested in joining. |  | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:44 - Apr 10 with 2773 views | costalotta |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:41 - Apr 10 by Darran |
Well I'm told the Yanks made NO offer for the Trusts shares. |
Because it was known that the Trust were not interested in selling? | | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:44 - Apr 10 with 2751 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:42 - Apr 10 by Martyrman57 |
It would be nice for any comment from the Trust on all this. Little wonder supporters are not interested in joining. |
Neathie has just posted the statement. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:45 - Apr 10 with 2744 views | Darran |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:44 - Apr 10 by costalotta |
Because it was known that the Trust were not interested in selling? |
No idea. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:49 - Apr 10 with 2711 views | Darran |
Im sure someone said that the Trust wrote to all the others saying they might be interested in selling though. | |
| |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:51 - Apr 10 with 2710 views | NeathJack |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:45 - Apr 10 by Darran |
No idea. |
Going by that statement/address from October it reads that the Trust indicated the preference would be not to sell providing they got certain assurances regarding their shareholding and non dilution of it.
When it became clear that the other shareholders had actually stitched them up for the voting rights and Levien indicated that no dilution could be guaranteed then the Trust approached the Yanks to discuss the purchase of the shares.
No offer was made. | | | |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:53 - Apr 10 with 2703 views | costalotta |
| Shareholder agreement - Americans comment on 20:51 - Apr 10 by NeathJack |
Going by that statement/address from October it reads that the Trust indicated the preference would be not to sell providing they got certain assurances regarding their shareholding and non dilution of it.
When it became clear that the other shareholders had actually stitched them up for the voting rights and Levien indicated that no dilution could be guaranteed then the Trust approached the Yanks to discuss the purchase of the shares.
No offer was made. |
That's kind of how I see it. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
