Swarford 15:33 - May 2 with 1526 views | Kinsey | I asked swarford where his apology was. Here's his response. "Ask Rashford, not me" W4nk3r! | | | | |
Swarford on 15:43 - May 2 with 1487 views | Darran | What? | |
| |
Swarford on 15:54 - May 2 with 1454 views | jack2jack |
Swarford on 15:43 - May 2 by Darran | What? |
Think Kinsey means Swarbrick, predictive text again Hi KInsey | | | |
Swarford on 15:58 - May 2 with 1434 views | Darran |
Swarford on 15:54 - May 2 by jack2jack | Think Kinsey means Swarbrick, predictive text again Hi KInsey |
What a ferking coconut Kinsey is. | |
| |
Swarford on 16:14 - May 2 with 1368 views | Neath_Jack | You do realise that's a parody account don't you? I guess not..... | |
| |
Swarford on 16:15 - May 2 with 1364 views | Kinsey | Hahaha. Quite correct. I'm a victim of auto text. So yes swarbrick was the correct c00nt I was referring to. YES! I got it right that time! | | | |
Swarford on 16:15 - May 2 with 1360 views | Kinsey |
Swarford on 16:14 - May 2 by Neath_Jack | You do realise that's a parody account don't you? I guess not..... |
I do indeed! | | | |
Swarford on 16:18 - May 2 with 1350 views | LeonWasGod | If that's true then he's got a point. As much as we like to jump on the back of the refs, Sorepr1ck only gave what he thought he saw, whereas Rashford is a diving cheat. edit - Ah, so no true then! [Post edited 2 May 2017 16:20]
| | | |
Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 with 1292 views | Borojack |
Swarford on 16:18 - May 2 by LeonWasGod | If that's true then he's got a point. As much as we like to jump on the back of the refs, Sorepr1ck only gave what he thought he saw, whereas Rashford is a diving cheat. edit - Ah, so no true then! [Post edited 2 May 2017 16:20]
|
Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away. Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages.. The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Swarford on 16:34 - May 2 with 1275 views | STID2017 |
Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 by Borojack | Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away. Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages.. The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games. |
That's harsh - what have League Two Clubs ever done to you ? | |
| |
Swarford on 00:47 - May 3 with 830 views | Smellyplumz |
Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 by Borojack | Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away. Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages.. The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games. |
He was in the hot tub after the game getting plumbed by the Utd team. | |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| |