Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Swarford 15:33 - May 2 with 1526 viewsKinsey

I asked swarford where his apology was. Here's his response.

"Ask Rashford, not me"

W4nk3r!
0
Swarford on 15:43 - May 2 with 1487 viewsDarran

What?

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Swarford on 15:54 - May 2 with 1454 viewsjack2jack

Swarford on 15:43 - May 2 by Darran

What?


Think Kinsey means Swarbrick, predictive text again
Hi KInsey
0
Swarford on 15:58 - May 2 with 1434 viewsDarran

Swarford on 15:54 - May 2 by jack2jack

Think Kinsey means Swarbrick, predictive text again
Hi KInsey


What a ferking coconut Kinsey is.

The first ever recipient of a Planet Swans Lifetime Achievement Award.
Poll: Who’s got the most experts

0
Swarford on 16:14 - May 2 with 1368 viewsNeath_Jack

You do realise that's a parody account don't you?

I guess not.....

I want a mate like Flashberryjacks, who wears a Barnsley jersey with "Swans are my second team" on the back.
Poll: Would you support military action against Syria on what we know so far?

0
Swarford on 16:15 - May 2 with 1364 viewsKinsey

Hahaha. Quite correct. I'm a victim of auto text.

So yes swarbrick was the correct c00nt I was referring to. YES! I got it right that time!
0
Swarford on 16:15 - May 2 with 1360 viewsKinsey

Swarford on 16:14 - May 2 by Neath_Jack

You do realise that's a parody account don't you?

I guess not.....


I do indeed!
0
Swarford on 16:18 - May 2 with 1350 viewsLeonWasGod

If that's true then he's got a point. As much as we like to jump on the back of the refs, Sorepr1ck only gave what he thought he saw, whereas Rashford is a diving cheat.

edit - Ah, so no true then!
[Post edited 2 May 2017 16:20]
0
Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 with 1292 viewsBorojack

Swarford on 16:18 - May 2 by LeonWasGod

If that's true then he's got a point. As much as we like to jump on the back of the refs, Sorepr1ck only gave what he thought he saw, whereas Rashford is a diving cheat.

edit - Ah, so no true then!
[Post edited 2 May 2017 16:20]


Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away.
Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages..
The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games.

Poll: Should Huw Jenkins be sacked

0
Login to get fewer ads

Swarford on 16:34 - May 2 with 1275 viewsSTID2017

Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 by Borojack

Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away.
Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages..
The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games.


That's harsh - what have League Two Clubs ever done to you ?

"Sanity and happiness are an impossible combination" - Mark Twain
Poll: Who Would You Want As Captain For Swans ?

0
Swarford on 00:47 - May 3 with 830 viewsSmellyplumz

Swarford on 16:30 - May 2 by Borojack

Poor decision should only have given it if he was certain it was a foul and how could he see it from 30 yards away.
Big club bias again Ratchford should get a 5 game ban and be fined a months wages..
The ref should be dropped to league 2 for this weekend's games.


He was in the hot tub after the game getting plumbed by the Utd team.

""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make."
Poll: Huw Jenkins

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024