| Jenkins and Dineen 19:56 - Jul 3 with 5399 views | monmouth |
Just in case it's lost in the other thread, I would like to propose that every Trust member standing for election state explicitly whether they personally support or oppose HJ and LD retaining paid roles in the club.
I think that is pretty central to my vote but, it's a democracy, so I accept if it's not the majority view. |  |
| |  |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:09 - Jul 3 with 4311 views | max936 |
It turns my stomach just seeing/hearing their names. |  |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:11 - Jul 3 with 4270 views | Darran |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:09 - Jul 3 by max936 |
It turns my stomach just seeing/hearing their names. |
You're drinking Gower Gold by the bucket full. |  |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:12 - Jul 3 with 4290 views | max936 |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:11 - Jul 3 by Darran |
You're drinking Gower Gold by the bucket full. |
Am I. ? | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:13 - Jul 3 with 4252 views | Darran |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:12 - Jul 3 by max936 |
Am I. ? |
Yes. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:15 - Jul 3 with 4262 views | Highjack |
Is this something that's actually under the trusts control? The payment of Jenkins I mean, not Max's drinking. |  |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:23 - Jul 3 with 4222 views | monmouth |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:15 - Jul 3 by Highjack |
Is this something that's actually under the trusts control? The payment of Jenkins I mean, not Max's drinking. |
Not directly, but I don't want anymore toadying to, or support for, these people. I want to know that the Trust members individually oppose them being in their current position....or don't.
If the Trust is to continue (i.e. No legal action) I want to know that the representatives are against these people being chairman and vice chairman of the club, whether they can do anything about it or not.
If it's not important to others to know that, fair enough. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:37 - Jul 3 with 4161 views | max936 |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:13 - Jul 3 by Darran |
Yes. |
None of you're business, but I haven't had a pint of Gower Gold for at least 18 months, notsure that I've even seen it anywhere either, so as usual you're full of wind and piss 
Oops yes I have and I had a few, at the Neath Food Fair last year, before Dineen got his grubby paws in the business. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:40 - Jul 3 with 4137 views | Dewi1jack |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:23 - Jul 3 by monmouth |
Not directly, but I don't want anymore toadying to, or support for, these people. I want to know that the Trust members individually oppose them being in their current position....or don't.
If the Trust is to continue (i.e. No legal action) I want to know that the representatives are against these people being chairman and vice chairman of the club, whether they can do anything about it or not.
If it's not important to others to know that, fair enough. |
Excellent idea Money and an excellent thread.
I know we can't get rid of the scumbag slimeball dickhead dimwit and capt beaky without the merrycans wanting it but I'd rather know which of the trust board are willing to say openly that they are opposed to these c**ts being near the club.
I know we all have to work with knob heads we don't like and be civil to the fugwits but we don't go drinking with them either.
Especially if they've really shit all over your chips
Unless you have low standards. |  |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:42 - Jul 3 with 4120 views | swancity |
As their reportedly on a combined annual salary of around £700,000 a year it tends to make ones blood boil
Yes pressure needs to increase to get rid of them. Not literally by the way just from their positions
They need to be out of the equation totally. in an ideal world. |  |
| Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:49 - Jul 3 with 4088 views | Watchman |
Also if it is proposed that their remuneration is performance related esp given the horrendous losses recently laid upon the club |  |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 20:51 - Jul 3 with 4080 views | Pokerface |
I would be stunned if an existing Trust board member standing for re-election comes out stating they want Jenkins and Dineen off payroll.
One big happy family.
It will have to be a newbie with balls- metaphorically speaking. [Post edited 3 Jul 2017 20:57]
| |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 21:03 - Jul 3 with 4044 views | Vetchfielder |
I know that many of our knowledgeable and articulate posters think that the Jenkins and Dineen presence is a side issue and , in practical logical terms I would agree.
But there's a principle at stake here and for me it's a deal breaker if any deal does not involve the removal of HJ and LD. I will not vote for any offer that doesn't include that as a clause. |  |
| Proud to have been one of the 231 |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 21:19 - Jul 3 with 3968 views | DafyddHuw |
Full marks for passion Mony, and my heart's with you, but a shit thread because -
1) you can't just introduce conditions for an election in the same month as the election takes place. These things need to be discussed and perhaps voted on and there's no time now for a proper process.
2} What's to stop everybody up for reelection just telling you that they oppose HJ and LD and then just carrying on as normal? |  | | |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 21:23 - Jul 3 with 3936 views | budegan |
Do we know why the Americans are so loyal to Jenkins et al that it's beyond consideration that there can be a deal involving them being booted? Genuine question. |  | | |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:00 - Jul 3 with 3838 views | morningstar |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 21:19 - Jul 3 by DafyddHuw |
Full marks for passion Mony, and my heart's with you, but a shit thread because -
1) you can't just introduce conditions for an election in the same month as the election takes place. These things need to be discussed and perhaps voted on and there's no time now for a proper process.
2} What's to stop everybody up for reelection just telling you that they oppose HJ and LD and then just carrying on as normal? |
1) you can't just introduce conditions for an election in the same month as the election takes place. These things need to be discussed and perhaps voted on and there's no time now for a proper process.
What the actual fvck are you on about Dafydd? Who needs to discuus what? It's quite a simple request, and there is no proper process that needs to be in place or voted on for that to take place!
2) What's to stop everybody up for reelection just telling you that they oppose HJ and LD and then just carrying on as normal?
Firstly it's not about opposing HJ and LD. Every single one of the trust board have opposed what the sell outs have done otherwise this thread or any other related thread wouldn't exist. It's whether they approve that they remain in their positions that they currently occupy. That's a massive difference. |  |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:12 - Jul 3 with 3797 views | Pokerface |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:00 - Jul 3 by morningstar |
1) you can't just introduce conditions for an election in the same month as the election takes place. These things need to be discussed and perhaps voted on and there's no time now for a proper process.
What the actual fvck are you on about Dafydd? Who needs to discuus what? It's quite a simple request, and there is no proper process that needs to be in place or voted on for that to take place!
2) What's to stop everybody up for reelection just telling you that they oppose HJ and LD and then just carrying on as normal?
Firstly it's not about opposing HJ and LD. Every single one of the trust board have opposed what the sell outs have done otherwise this thread or any other related thread wouldn't exist. It's whether they approve that they remain in their positions that they currently occupy. That's a massive difference. |
"Every single one of the trust board have opposed what the sell outs have done otherwise this thread or any other related thread wouldn't exist. "
The Trust board are very quiet in their criticism of Morgan and Dineen... lets be honest.
Most fans realise that the Trust gets too close to the directors... like rabbits in headlights. Building close relations at a BIG cost.
Not businessmen. They are being taken for a ride AGAIN.
Easy to see from outside looking in.
But egos take over for the Trust unfortunately. Cost us once will cost us again.
Quote me in 3 years time.
I was ignored / banned last time I had an opposing view. [Post edited 3 Jul 2017 22:13]
| |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:18 - Jul 3 with 3735 views | Darran |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:12 - Jul 3 by Pokerface |
"Every single one of the trust board have opposed what the sell outs have done otherwise this thread or any other related thread wouldn't exist. "
The Trust board are very quiet in their criticism of Morgan and Dineen... lets be honest.
Most fans realise that the Trust gets too close to the directors... like rabbits in headlights. Building close relations at a BIG cost.
Not businessmen. They are being taken for a ride AGAIN.
Easy to see from outside looking in.
But egos take over for the Trust unfortunately. Cost us once will cost us again.
Quote me in 3 years time.
I was ignored / banned last time I had an opposing view. [Post edited 3 Jul 2017 22:13]
|
You were banned for being a personal cùnt Bob. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:24 - Jul 3 with 3733 views | DafyddHuw |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:18 - Jul 3 by Darran |
You were banned for being a personal cùnt Bob. |
Don't sit on the fence Dar. | | | |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:26 - Jul 3 with 3698 views | Darran |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:24 - Jul 3 by DafyddHuw |
Don't sit on the fence Dar. |
It's true his banning from here under his last username had nothing to do with posts about the Trust. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:41 - Jul 3 with 3655 views | Pokerface |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:26 - Jul 3 by Darran |
It's true his banning from here under his last username had nothing to do with posts about the Trust. |
I had you on ignore for last week.
Wow. What a great site it is without bitter / attention seeking/ me me me Darr. Ruins every thread he joins. I can laugh about it now as it is for 5 mins a week I read the tw@ts posts.
Carry on Darr. Will read your pointless bitter threads next week. You dont change in fairness you minge. I look forward to your football posts, as clueless as ever no doubt. Did you ever kick a ball. I think not. Anyway until next week. Get a life you bitter tw@t.Lol [Post edited 3 Jul 2017 22:45]
| |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:45 - Jul 3 with 3636 views | harryhpalmer |
excuse my ignorance as an Exile...
Does fatso own the Gower Brewery now? | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:49 - Jul 3 with 3602 views | Darran |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:41 - Jul 3 by Pokerface |
I had you on ignore for last week.
Wow. What a great site it is without bitter / attention seeking/ me me me Darr. Ruins every thread he joins. I can laugh about it now as it is for 5 mins a week I read the tw@ts posts.
Carry on Darr. Will read your pointless bitter threads next week. You dont change in fairness you minge. I look forward to your football posts, as clueless as ever no doubt. Did you ever kick a ball. I think not. Anyway until next week. Get a life you bitter tw@t.Lol [Post edited 3 Jul 2017 22:45]
|
Blimey kicked a ball? lol
Listen çunt you never got banned from here for dissing the Trust so stop lying. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 23:01 - Jul 3 with 3558 views | max936 |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 22:45 - Jul 3 by harryhpalmer |
excuse my ignorance as an Exile...
Does fatso own the Gower Brewery now? |
Apparently he's got an interest, I'm not all together sure, but I think Jenkins and Morgan are in on it as well, pigs in a trough innit. | |
| |
| Jenkins and Dineen on 23:36 - Jul 3 with 3492 views | Pokerface |
Wow. I got banned by someone and then a u turn and unbanned.
Very strange.
If questionning the Trust is not allowed or replying to abuse by Darran is not allowed please put in terms and conditions. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
