The Daily Mail is for Retards 22:49 - Jul 14 with 3608 views | BrynCartwright | The Daily Mail and Mail Online once again drops a bollock. Just goes to show that it is a reprehensible abomination written by and for a collection of reactionary dicks. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-40608667 Not that I am a massive Royalist by the way. Just really feckin hate the DM and all it stands for. Whenever I see someone voluntarily buying or reading it I just want to puke all over them. | |
| | |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 with 1993 views | exiledclaseboy | This isn't the best (or indeed the worst) example of the Daily Mail's excesses. But I agree. Words can't express the disadain I have for the Daily Mail. I hate it, everything it stands for and its pervasive and insidious influence on British public life. And to those who will reply to this by saying that the Mail and (for example) the Guardian are two sides of the same coin and are somehow "both as bad as each other". No. They really aren't. F*ck off and get yourself an original thought. [Post edited 14 Jul 2017 23:00]
| |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 with 1992 views | Pokerface | If that is all that's troubling you at the moment count yourself lucky. Rant away and get it all off your chest, it is a Friday after all. Agree that the Daily Mail is awful, yet highly addictive. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 with 1979 views | Darran | I don't agree. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:03 - Jul 14 with 1971 views | SoberBaker |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | This isn't the best (or indeed the worst) example of the Daily Mail's excesses. But I agree. Words can't express the disadain I have for the Daily Mail. I hate it, everything it stands for and its pervasive and insidious influence on British public life. And to those who will reply to this by saying that the Mail and (for example) the Guardian are two sides of the same coin and are somehow "both as bad as each other". No. They really aren't. F*ck off and get yourself an original thought. [Post edited 14 Jul 2017 23:00]
|
The Mail is quality for a bit of tit. The Guardian isn't. Message ends. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:07 - Jul 14 with 1944 views | Swans777 |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | This isn't the best (or indeed the worst) example of the Daily Mail's excesses. But I agree. Words can't express the disadain I have for the Daily Mail. I hate it, everything it stands for and its pervasive and insidious influence on British public life. And to those who will reply to this by saying that the Mail and (for example) the Guardian are two sides of the same coin and are somehow "both as bad as each other". No. They really aren't. F*ck off and get yourself an original thought. [Post edited 14 Jul 2017 23:00]
|
From what I can remember, the Guardian is a terrible newspaper. Also the Mirror too. As someone once said "Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery". | | | |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:14 - Jul 14 with 1918 views | SoberBaker |
I'm a sucker for ultra sheer tights with a denier lower than 10 | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:16 - Jul 14 with 1907 views | BrynCartwright |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:07 - Jul 14 by Swans777 | From what I can remember, the Guardian is a terrible newspaper. Also the Mirror too. As someone once said "Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery". |
Always really enjoyed reading the Guardian. My old Dad reads the Mirror daily. Got any more awesome anecdotes to enliven our lives? You sound like a cheap AA Gill or even cheaper Peter Hitchens. | |
| | Login to get fewer ads
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:16 - Jul 14 with 1905 views | exiledclaseboy |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:03 - Jul 14 by SoberBaker | The Mail is quality for a bit of tit. The Guardian isn't. Message ends. |
Can't argue that to be fair. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:17 - Jul 14 with 1893 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 22:57 - Jul 14 by Darran | I don't agree. |
When I say I disagree I meant ginger pubes and his privacy. If you're going to act like an international playboy you deserve to be treated like one. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:18 - Jul 14 with 1896 views | Swans777 |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:16 - Jul 14 by BrynCartwright | Always really enjoyed reading the Guardian. My old Dad reads the Mirror daily. Got any more awesome anecdotes to enliven our lives? You sound like a cheap AA Gill or even cheaper Peter Hitchens. |
And you sound like Karl Marx, my friend. | | | |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:21 - Jul 14 with 1879 views | exiledclaseboy |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:17 - Jul 14 by Darran | When I say I disagree I meant ginger pubes and his privacy. If you're going to act like an international playboy you deserve to be treated like one. |
What are international playboys treated like then? | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:22 - Jul 14 with 1869 views | DwightYorkeSuperstar | The Independent is awful too with its headlines deliberately trying to deceive those with little intelligence. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:23 - Jul 14 with 1854 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:21 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | What are international playboys treated like then? |
There's a link in the OP. Dear God how dull are people on here? | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:28 - Jul 14 with 1846 views | exiledclaseboy |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:23 - Jul 14 by Darran | There's a link in the OP. Dear God how dull are people on here? |
What's the story in the OP got to do with international playboys? It's about Prince Harry, his girlfriend and whether the beach they were on was public or private. The Mail's c*ntiness goes far deeper than publishing sneaky pics of minor royals and their latest squeeze. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:29 - Jul 14 with 1833 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:28 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | What's the story in the OP got to do with international playboys? It's about Prince Harry, his girlfriend and whether the beach they were on was public or private. The Mail's c*ntiness goes far deeper than publishing sneaky pics of minor royals and their latest squeeze. |
It goes with the job. I don't disagree on your second paragraph. Cock. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:31 - Jul 14 with 1837 views | Jack_Meoff |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:07 - Jul 14 by Swans777 | From what I can remember, the Guardian is a terrible newspaper. Also the Mirror too. As someone once said "Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery". |
Churchill was a massive, massive c*nt. There. I said it. | |
| If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever. |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:32 - Jul 14 with 1830 views | exiledclaseboy |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:31 - Jul 14 by Jack_Meoff | Churchill was a massive, massive c*nt. There. I said it. |
No doubt about that. As an almost related aside, John Lithgow is brilliant as Churchill in The Crown. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:35 - Jul 14 with 1813 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:32 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | No doubt about that. As an almost related aside, John Lithgow is brilliant as Churchill in The Crown. |
He was brilliant in Dexter too. Just saying. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:37 - Jul 14 with 1811 views | exiledclaseboy |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:35 - Jul 14 by Darran | He was brilliant in Dexter too. Just saying. |
Never seen that. He was also very good in Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Conclusion. John Lithgow is a brilliant actor. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:38 - Jul 14 with 1808 views | Pokerface |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:31 - Jul 14 by Jack_Meoff | Churchill was a massive, massive c*nt. There. I said it. |
He may have been but none of us would be posting here today if he wasn't the man he was. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:39 - Jul 14 with 1798 views | BrynCartwright |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:18 - Jul 14 by Swans777 | And you sound like Karl Marx, my friend. |
Never mentioned Communism or Socialism. Just how unbelievably poor the DM is as a newspaper. On a daily basis it's headlines demonstrates Little England hatred at it's worst. Anyone that contributes to this vile publication by buying it seriously exhibits xenophobic and hate-filled tendencies. ...and your supporting a South Wales football team? | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:40 - Jul 14 with 1794 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:37 - Jul 14 by exiledclaseboy | Never seen that. He was also very good in Rise of the Planet of the Apes. Conclusion. John Lithgow is a brilliant actor. |
Dexter was a bit hit and miss with good and bad seasons. The season Lithgow was in was outstanding. Sad about Rita though. | |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:40 - Jul 14 with 1797 views | Jack_Meoff |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:35 - Jul 14 by Darran | He was brilliant in Dexter too. Just saying. |
Good shout man, he was creepy as you like. Dexter's sister the sweary one, almost makes me believe in the demiurge. Hot as. | |
| If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face--forever. |
| |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:43 - Jul 14 with 1783 views | Darran |
The Daily Mail is for Retards on 23:40 - Jul 14 by Jack_Meoff | Good shout man, he was creepy as you like. Dexter's sister the sweary one, almost makes me believe in the demiurge. Hot as. |
Motherfuçking Debra is truly magnificent. | |
| |
| |