Clucas deal specifics. 18:24 - Aug 21 with 17344 views | E20Jack | I read the main Clucas thread and didnt see it clarified anywhere. £16.5m is the total value of the package it is reported. I read one person say £15m + £1.5m in add-ons.. But where does that leave Kingsley? He is worth a couple of million surely? £12m + £1.5m add ons + £3m Kingsley? =£16.5m. Surely it isnt £16.5m AND Kingsley on top.... is it? EDIT - just saw it in the Kingsley thread funnily enough. Ignore this! [Post edited 21 Aug 2017 18:25]
| |
| | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 23:00 - Aug 21 with 1496 views | E20Jack |
Clucas deal specifics. on 22:54 - Aug 21 by WarwickHunt | The clue is in the title, Einstein. Sell-ON. Do you think we got him on a free transfer? |
No, we got him in a swap deal. You clearly think sell-on means something different to what it actually means. If I bought a car off you for £1000 and sold it for £900, I would have bought it from you and "sold it on" for £900. A sell on fee is a fee that is triggered when the player is sold on. Nothing more. Hence why every single report disagrees with you and agrees with me. Some are done on profit, this one clearly wasnt. Just as Cornelius wasnt in the deal taking him back to Denmark in a cut priced deal that same very season. I am still awaiting absolutely anything to back your thoughts (misunderstanding) up on this deal. I have provided many and can provide another 20 probably. Feel free | |
| |
Clucas deal specifics. on 23:39 - Aug 21 with 1388 views | E20Jack | Oh a and as you are quoting the Times regarding the Salah deal, I looked to see what their view on the Gylfi one was. Shock horror they agree with me and think you are wrong like 100% of other reports do... https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tottenham-hotspur-in-line-for-gylfi-sigurdsso "Tottenham Hotspur are set to receive £5 million if Gylfi Sigurdsson completes a £50 million transfer from Swansea City to Everton. Sigurdsson joined Swansea for a nominal fee as part of the deal in which Ben Davies and Michel Vorm signed for Spurs three years ago, but his former club negotiated a 10 per cent sell-on clause for the Iceland midfielder." | |
| |
Clucas deal specifics. on 23:59 - Aug 21 with 1326 views | E20Jack | More deals structered in the way the Gylfi deal was... "Barnsley, meanwhile, inserted a 15% sell-on clause into the deal that took John Stones to Everton in 2013. His £47.5m move to Manchester City last summer therefore bagged them around £7.1m, though there were some suggestions that the payment could rise as high as £9m. Elsewhere, Bournemouth, who were not a top-flight club at the time, received £6.25m from Adam Lallana’s £25m move from Southampton to Liverpool in 2014, having inserted a 25% sell-on clause when he moved along the south coast at the age of 12." [Post edited 22 Aug 2017 0:00]
| |
| | Login to get fewer ads
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:34 - Aug 22 with 1236 views | WarwickHunt |
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:18 - Aug 22 by E20Jack | Again what on God's earth are you babbling on about? Copenhagen didn't have a sell on clause you massive f*cking melt, Cardiff had the sell on clause. I would hardly call a swap deal normal circumstances either, would you? Still not one source backing your unfounded claims. Not one. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. There is only one who hasn't thought it through and it is the one squirming that he is wrong on a football forum. Quoting other deals as he cannot find one single report agreeing with him, even his source he quoted for that completely different and unrelated transfer(??) disagrees with him with their own report on this specific deal (link also kindly provided above for added effect). You certainly were not at the front of the queue when the big man was handing out common sense, but you were first in line for resilience, i am not sure whether it is sheer stupidity or just dumb determination, but your ability to take one of the biggest beatings this forum has seen and to keep coming back takes something truly special Still waiting on any kind of report that backs your clear misunderstanding of the deal. Even a little tiny weeny one... [Post edited 22 Aug 2017 0:28]
|
Arf. Copenhagen bought him back at a loss - by your reckoning Cardiff probably should have paid them a % on top of the amount they sold him back for. A "sell-on" clause innit! Capisce now, fûckwit? Bit of a stretch for you, obviously... "Elsewhere, Bournemouth, who were not a top-flight club at the time, received £6.25m from Adam Lallana’s £25m move from Southampton to Liverpool in 2014, having inserted a 25% sell-on clause when he moved along the south coast at the age of 12." Which part of a "25% sell-on clause when he moved along the south coast at the age of 12" are you struggling with? TWELVE! They paid a few grand in compo...did you think they sold him for £10m? | | | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:47 - Aug 22 with 1215 views | E20Jack |
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:34 - Aug 22 by WarwickHunt | Arf. Copenhagen bought him back at a loss - by your reckoning Cardiff probably should have paid them a % on top of the amount they sold him back for. A "sell-on" clause innit! Capisce now, fûckwit? Bit of a stretch for you, obviously... "Elsewhere, Bournemouth, who were not a top-flight club at the time, received £6.25m from Adam Lallana’s £25m move from Southampton to Liverpool in 2014, having inserted a 25% sell-on clause when he moved along the south coast at the age of 12." Which part of a "25% sell-on clause when he moved along the south coast at the age of 12" are you struggling with? TWELVE! They paid a few grand in compo...did you think they sold him for £10m? |
Again, what are you talking about? Why on earth would Cardiff pay Copenhagen a sell in fee when there wasn't one. You don't get a fee every time a player is sold you massive f*cking queef. Think about what you are saying for one single minute. The sell on fee was negotiated BY CARDIFF for a sell on fee FROM when they (Copenhagen), funnily enough... SELL HIM ON. Okay hopefully you finally get that, I cannot be any clearer if I was attempting to explain to my 4 year old neice. So moving on... Nice selective quoting there by my new found favourite floundering fish. Try the sentences above in that quote. I'll help.... "Barnsley, meanwhile, inserted a 15% sell-on clause into the deal that took John Stones to Everton in 2013. His £47.5m move to Manchester City last summer therefore bagged them around £7.1m, though there were some suggestions that the payment could rise as high as £9m." Now Stones was sold to Everton for £3m. So the profit was £44.5m. Yes? With me? 15% of £47.5m (the whole sum not the profit) works out as £7.125m.... You know, the figure that Barnsley reportedly got as a result. What a coincidence The umpire has said "Game, set, match E20" long ago. Leave the court gracefully and accept you have been utterly hammered by the better man with the better equipment. You are starting to make a show of yourself and the crowd are getting restless. Even your own links disagree with you ffs, you f*cking melt (arf) [Post edited 22 Aug 2017 0:58]
| |
| |
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:56 - Aug 22 with 1197 views | WarwickHunt |
Clucas deal specifics. on 00:47 - Aug 22 by E20Jack | Again, what are you talking about? Why on earth would Cardiff pay Copenhagen a sell in fee when there wasn't one. You don't get a fee every time a player is sold you massive f*cking queef. Think about what you are saying for one single minute. The sell on fee was negotiated BY CARDIFF for a sell on fee FROM when they (Copenhagen), funnily enough... SELL HIM ON. Okay hopefully you finally get that, I cannot be any clearer if I was attempting to explain to my 4 year old neice. So moving on... Nice selective quoting there by my new found favourite floundering fish. Try the sentences above in that quote. I'll help.... "Barnsley, meanwhile, inserted a 15% sell-on clause into the deal that took John Stones to Everton in 2013. His £47.5m move to Manchester City last summer therefore bagged them around £7.1m, though there were some suggestions that the payment could rise as high as £9m." Now Stones was sold to Everton for £3m. So the profit was £44.5m. Yes? With me? 15% of £47.5m (the whole sum not the profit) works out as £7.125m.... You know, the figure that Barnsley reportedly got as a result. What a coincidence The umpire has said "Game, set, match E20" long ago. Leave the court gracefully and accept you have been utterly hammered by the better man with the better equipment. You are starting to make a show of yourself and the crowd are getting restless. Even your own links disagree with you ffs, you f*cking melt (arf) [Post edited 22 Aug 2017 0:58]
|
Keep quoting two bob tabloid football journalists and boring everyone shitless (yet again...) with your pompous drivel. I'm in London - feel free to carry on this little chat in person anytime. You know the drill. Edit: or would that be too "risky?" [Post edited 22 Aug 2017 0:58]
| | | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 01:20 - Aug 22 with 1139 views | E20Jack |
Jim jams on long ago. Consider yourself my very own night cap. Be careful in my City, someone walking around with your IQ may be hazard for my fellow workers. You are the equivelant of the dunce kid in the football team, don't you go attempting any tackles now you clumsy f*cking oaf. | |
| |
Clucas deal specifics. on 01:24 - Aug 22 with 1124 views | WarwickHunt |
Clucas deal specifics. on 01:20 - Aug 22 by E20Jack | Jim jams on long ago. Consider yourself my very own night cap. Be careful in my City, someone walking around with your IQ may be hazard for my fellow workers. You are the equivelant of the dunce kid in the football team, don't you go attempting any tackles now you clumsy f*cking oaf. |
Nightcap is one word, you dopey cünt. Be careful out there, Benny. | | | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 02:26 - Aug 22 with 1064 views | UplandsJack |
You are correct Warwick 👠I have it from two very reliable people, that Spurs will receive 10% of any profit OVER the widely accepted/reported £10 million we paid for him.(swap with Davies value) I was also informed that we the deal was structured, if I recall correctly £33 million on him signing, and the remaining £12 million paid over an agreed time period. I was also told Everton are also paying Siggy's loyalty payment that is normally paid by us, taking the deals full value to us to £45 million Clear. if you see where I'm coming from. But obviously we still got to pay Spurs £3.5million out of that. | | | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 08:51 - Aug 22 with 983 views | E20Jack |
Clucas deal specifics. on 08:44 - Aug 22 by WarwickHunt | Thicker than an elephant's foreskin and a gobby shitehouse as well. Let's meet for a chat. Too "risky", big boy? |
Look at old man Phil getting all angry because he is wrong on a football forum. You utter melt. You utter completely wrong melt at that. Hopefully this lesson will be of great value to you going forward. Guffaw. Arf. | |
| |
Clucas deal specifics. on 09:01 - Aug 22 with 961 views | WarwickHunt |
Clucas deal specifics. on 02:26 - Aug 22 by UplandsJack | You are correct Warwick 👠I have it from two very reliable people, that Spurs will receive 10% of any profit OVER the widely accepted/reported £10 million we paid for him.(swap with Davies value) I was also informed that we the deal was structured, if I recall correctly £33 million on him signing, and the remaining £12 million paid over an agreed time period. I was also told Everton are also paying Siggy's loyalty payment that is normally paid by us, taking the deals full value to us to £45 million Clear. if you see where I'm coming from. But obviously we still got to pay Spurs £3.5million out of that. |
Thanks - sell-on clauses are usually just that. A % of the sell-on profit. Knobchops ( a risk analyst ) has trouble grasping this and relies on equally dim tabloid journos for his FACTS! I suppose there's a slim chance that Levy pulled fûckwit Jenkins' pants down on the deal but if I doubt if even Gonzo is that dim, unless of course, he took advice from PS's resident City genius... | | | |
Clucas deal specifics. on 09:02 - Aug 22 with 957 views | WarwickHunt |
Clucas deal specifics. on 08:51 - Aug 22 by E20Jack | Look at old man Phil getting all angry because he is wrong on a football forum. You utter melt. You utter completely wrong melt at that. Hopefully this lesson will be of great value to you going forward. Guffaw. Arf. |
Shithouse. | | | |
| |