| Genuine question - from a Trust Member 19:19 - Nov 5 with 45788 views | marchamjack |
Were The Trust any part of the discussion process to keep Clement?
Thanks in advance. |  |
| Oh,..Dave, what's occuring? |
| |  |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:22 - Nov 5 with 8620 views | Swanjaxs |
Probably about as much of a part they played in the discussions regarding the sell off to the Americans [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 19:26]
|  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 19:35 - Nov 5 with 8479 views | BigPhilG |
I'm afraid the trust is dead in the water. At least Chelsea won today for you |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:02 - Nov 5 with 8484 views | Uxbridge |
I don't know. There's a Trust board meeting tomorrow evening. I'll ask the question then and let you know. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:10 - Nov 5 with 8434 views | Landore_Jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:02 - Nov 5 by Uxbridge |
I don't know. There's a Trust board meeting tomorrow evening. I'll ask the question then and let you know. |
Will the Trust continue to back Jenkins or call for his resignation? |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:12 - Nov 5 with 8353 views | dickythorpe |
An irrelevance. |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:15 - Nov 5 with 8402 views | Uxbridge |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:10 - Nov 5 by Landore_Jack |
Will the Trust continue to back Jenkins or call for his resignation? |
The Trust board needs to communicate its view one way or another I completely agree. Safe to say that'll be discussed tomorrow. [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 20:16]
| |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:16 - Nov 5 with 8294 views | Darran |
I think the question in the OP should be “Were The Trust any part of the discussion process to keep Clement if there really was a discussion?” myself. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:17 - Nov 5 with 8383 views | QJumpingJack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:15 - Nov 5 by Uxbridge |
The Trust board needs to communicate its view one way or another I completely agree. Safe to say that'll be discussed tomorrow. [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 20:16]
|
But what happens if Jenkins/Americans sack him tomorrow morning? |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 5 with 8298 views | Garyjack |
I don't understand the OP's question as surely there has never been a discussion to 'keep him'. He signed a 2 1/2 year contract when he came to us? |  | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:20 - Nov 5 with 8364 views | Landore_Jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:15 - Nov 5 by Uxbridge |
The Trust board needs to communicate its view one way or another I completely agree. Safe to say that'll be discussed tomorrow. [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 20:16]
|
So, we expect to see a statement soon? [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 20:22]
| |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:20 - Nov 5 with 8264 views | Darran |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:19 - Nov 5 by Garyjack |
I don't understand the OP's question as surely there has never been a discussion to 'keep him'. He signed a 2 1/2 year contract when he came to us? |
FFS. After the game yesterday as reported by Chris Wathan mun. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:22 - Nov 5 with 8339 views | Uxbridge |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:20 - Nov 5 by Landore_Jack |
So, we expect to see a statement soon? [Post edited 5 Nov 2017 20:22]
|
That needs to happen IMO.
But, and I'll bang the same drum here, I can hardly decide such things unilaterally. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:23 - Nov 5 with 8327 views | Uxbridge |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:17 - Nov 5 by QJumpingJack |
But what happens if Jenkins/Americans sack him tomorrow morning? |
Then the answer will depend very much on what engagement there would have been. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:25 - Nov 5 with 8313 views | Landore_Jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:22 - Nov 5 by Uxbridge |
That needs to happen IMO.
But, and I'll bang the same drum here, I can hardly decide such things unilaterally. |
What about the recent protest? Will the Trust be discussing this? | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:26 - Nov 5 with 8292 views | Uxbridge |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:25 - Nov 5 by Landore_Jack |
What about the recent protest? Will the Trust be discussing this? |
Well, I went along and spoke to the people there. So aye, I'm sure it'll come up in the discussions. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:30 - Nov 5 with 8255 views | jack247 |
I haven’t read Wales Online, but if they are accurately stating there was a discussion about Clements future, results pick up quick or he is a dead man walking. | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:31 - Nov 5 with 8242 views | monmouth |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:27 - Nov 5 by shandyjack |
it was done over a thing called a telephone i believe the article states |
Rich bastards. |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:33 - Nov 5 with 8153 views | Garyjack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:27 - Nov 5 by shandyjack |
it was done over a thing called a telephone i believe the article states |
No SHIT! 
1. Stuart MC was part of a conference call whilst in the Landore club.
2. Wathan used one of those telephone things to call Huw?
Which one is more likely? Think very hard now mind!  | | | |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:33 - Nov 5 with 8224 views | Landore_Jack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:26 - Nov 5 by Uxbridge |
Well, I went along and spoke to the people there. So aye, I'm sure it'll come up in the discussions. |
Depending on the outcome of the meeting, is there a possibility that the Trust could back the protest? | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:36 - Nov 5 with 8195 views | shandyjack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:33 - Nov 5 by Garyjack |
No SHIT!
1. Stuart MC was part of a conference call whilst in the Landore club.
2. Wathan used one of those telephone things to call Huw?
Which one is more likely? Think very hard now mind! |
or stuart Mc wasn't on the phone call, and it was only Huw and the 2 Yanks as the article states |  |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:37 - Nov 5 with 8176 views | monmouth |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:33 - Nov 5 by Garyjack |
No SHIT!
1. Stuart MC was part of a conference call whilst in the Landore club.
2. Wathan used one of those telephone things to call Huw?
Which one is more likely? Think very hard now mind! |
Funny enough I was going to ask if the Landore club had videoconferencing.
Just for a laugh like.
I think we all know the answer to this question (were the Trust consulted) don't we? And it's no big deal, because the board can do a volte face anytime. Laudrup was told he was safe to his face by Junko the same day that he sacked him by email if I remember right. | |
| |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:40 - Nov 5 with 8077 views | Garyjack |
| Genuine question - from a Trust Member on 20:36 - Nov 5 by shandyjack |
or stuart Mc wasn't on the phone call, and it was only Huw and the 2 Yanks as the article states |
Well there we are then. I correctly answered the OP's question didn't i! | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
