By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
OUT WITH A DEAL EATING OUR CAKE AND LOVING IT suck it up remoaners
And like a typical anti democracy remoaner he decided the will of the people should be ignored the minute the democratic result was in total fecking hypocrite 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Despite it being voted in to law by the commons the spineless two faced remoaner MPs have totally abandoned any morals and decided to ignore the will of the British people.
It will be remembered and no election or referendum will ever be the same again in this country.
The one thing that will come is a massive surge in the popularity of UKIP or a similar party in the future who stand for the 52%.
Happy Days.
[Post edited 1 Jan 2021 14:13]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
One side overspent by 10% to win by a 3% swing in votes.
Professor Patman explaining how Brexit referendum cheating has left British democracy diminished, yet PM refuses to act as she and her cabinet are the main beneficiaries of criminal acts that leave the UK looking like a banana republic. Full interview: https://t.co/YsMMp4ISTnpic.twitter.com/CqnsoFI7tV
The Countdown begins. on 10:50 - Jan 2 by Batterseajack
One side overspent by 10% to win by a 3% swing in votes.
Professor Patman explaining how Brexit referendum cheating has left British democracy diminished, yet PM refuses to act as she and her cabinet are the main beneficiaries of criminal acts that leave the UK looking like a banana republic. Full interview: https://t.co/YsMMp4ISTnpic.twitter.com/CqnsoFI7tV
The Countdown begins. on 10:50 - Jan 2 by Batterseajack
One side overspent by 10% to win by a 3% swing in votes.
Professor Patman explaining how Brexit referendum cheating has left British democracy diminished, yet PM refuses to act as she and her cabinet are the main beneficiaries of criminal acts that leave the UK looking like a banana republic. Full interview: https://t.co/YsMMp4ISTnpic.twitter.com/CqnsoFI7tV
If you included the fact the government spend over 120% of the the £7m budget on biased pro EU propaganda leaflets then you may be taken seriously. The fact you didn’t makes your percentages laughable. If you find leaves 10% overspend bad then you’re a hypocrite of the highest order for choosing to ignore the leaflets.
-1
The Countdown begins. on 12:08 - Jan 2 with 3357 views
If you included the fact the government spend over 120% of the the £7m budget on biased pro EU propaganda leaflets then you may be taken seriously. The fact you didn’t makes your percentages laughable. If you find leaves 10% overspend bad then you’re a hypocrite of the highest order for choosing to ignore the leaflets.
Other than the Government outlining its position and preference, which its entitled to do, what bit leaflet was pro EU? It was a transparent piece that set out to inform the public.
3
The Countdown begins. on 12:47 - Jan 2 with 3342 views
The Countdown begins. on 12:08 - Jan 2 by Batterseajack
Other than the Government outlining its position and preference, which its entitled to do, what bit leaflet was pro EU? It was a transparent piece that set out to inform the public.
It was also soft, strong and thoroughly absorbent.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
The Countdown begins. on 12:08 - Jan 2 by Batterseajack
Other than the Government outlining its position and preference, which its entitled to do, what bit leaflet was pro EU? It was a transparent piece that set out to inform the public.
It was a sneaky way of Cameron using £9m of public money to support the remain campaign. Don’t go on about the 10% overspend and 3% winning margin when you choose to ignore that fact. If you’re gonna continue the pettiness over this spending then using your logic the winning margin would have been bigger than 3% had those leaflets not been published.
-1
The Countdown begins. on 16:26 - Jan 2 with 3263 views
It was a sneaky way of Cameron using £9m of public money to support the remain campaign. Don’t go on about the 10% overspend and 3% winning margin when you choose to ignore that fact. If you’re gonna continue the pettiness over this spending then using your logic the winning margin would have been bigger than 3% had those leaflets not been published.
Yep then of course you had the publically (and partially EU) funded BBC peddling remain at every opportunity.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
It was a sneaky way of Cameron using £9m of public money to support the remain campaign. Don’t go on about the 10% overspend and 3% winning margin when you choose to ignore that fact. If you’re gonna continue the pettiness over this spending then using your logic the winning margin would have been bigger than 3% had those leaflets not been published.
Leave side guilty of criminal offence. Remain side not guilty of criminal offence.
The Law is quite important.
Beware of the Risen People
1
The Countdown begins. on 00:21 - Jan 3 with 3180 views
The Countdown begins. on 00:19 - Jan 3 by Kilkennyjack
Leave side guilty of criminal offence. Remain side not guilty of criminal offence.
The Law is quite important.
The law is and always has been the coercive tool by which the establishment enact their will. It’s comically naive to imagine it has ever been applied equally either now or in ages past, Killy.
An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it.
0
The Countdown begins. on 12:35 - Jan 3 with 3058 views
The Countdown begins. on 00:02 - Jan 3 by Kilkennyjack
Apart from the BBC Calais jungle reports every single night, and Farage on Question Time every week.
Not to mention Andrew Neil and john humphries(r4), amongst others.
The BBC facilitated Brexit. The BbC is a key part of the Tory led establishment. Marr - Tory Laura K - Tory Nick Robinson - Tory
The BBC are right wing bias in it’s makeup of core politics staff, but with everyone complaining they are bias one way or the other probably means they’re neutral. Dangerously neutral because they’ve stopped challenging and give false equivalency to everything. They’ve admitted as much.
They’re still at it, giving the disgraced Toby Young a platform to lie about the potential withdrawl agreement savings in the event of a no deal - Brexit: Universities warn no deal is 'biggest-ever threat' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46748512
There won’t be a “£49bn windfall” that can be used to “compensate British universities for any short-term losses”. For 3 reasons: 1) We don’t know the exact figure, but £39bn is what’s been quoted so far, 2) in the event of no deal only about half of this may have the potential to be a windfall, but that’s far from certain and likely to be challenged in the courts by the EU, and 3) those payments he thinks we’ll be saving are staggered over many years, so won’t be available in the short term.
The withdrawl agreement “windfall” is the new Boris Bus lie. But despite being so easy to challenge, otherwise sensible people will chant it like some mantra. Because that’s what this is: a binding slogan for what they see as their sacred faith. And nobody likes to see their faith challenged, even with easily provable facts.
The Countdown begins. on 10:18 - Jan 4 by LeonWasGod
The BBC are right wing bias in it’s makeup of core politics staff, but with everyone complaining they are bias one way or the other probably means they’re neutral. Dangerously neutral because they’ve stopped challenging and give false equivalency to everything. They’ve admitted as much.
They’re still at it, giving the disgraced Toby Young a platform to lie about the potential withdrawl agreement savings in the event of a no deal - Brexit: Universities warn no deal is 'biggest-ever threat' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46748512
There won’t be a “£49bn windfall” that can be used to “compensate British universities for any short-term losses”. For 3 reasons: 1) We don’t know the exact figure, but £39bn is what’s been quoted so far, 2) in the event of no deal only about half of this may have the potential to be a windfall, but that’s far from certain and likely to be challenged in the courts by the EU, and 3) those payments he thinks we’ll be saving are staggered over many years, so won’t be available in the short term.
The withdrawl agreement “windfall” is the new Boris Bus lie. But despite being so easy to challenge, otherwise sensible people will chant it like some mantra. Because that’s what this is: a binding slogan for what they see as their sacred faith. And nobody likes to see their faith challenged, even with easily provable facts.