By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
OUT WITH A DEAL EATING OUR CAKE AND LOVING IT suck it up remoaners
And like a typical anti democracy remoaner he decided the will of the people should be ignored the minute the democratic result was in total fecking hypocrite 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Despite it being voted in to law by the commons the spineless two faced remoaner MPs have totally abandoned any morals and decided to ignore the will of the British people.
It will be remembered and no election or referendum will ever be the same again in this country.
The one thing that will come is a massive surge in the popularity of UKIP or a similar party in the future who stand for the 52%.
Happy Days.
[Post edited 1 Jan 2021 14:13]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
The Countdown begins. on 09:19 - Jan 20 by WarwickHunt
Undoubtedly true. The millennials and Marxists who’ve largely made the Labour Party into a mass membership party again are far removed from the traditional Labour voters like my parents were. Then again, so is the “leadership”.
Corbyn’s pathetic and disingenuous performance during the referendum campaign and his supine acceptance of ludicrous Brexiter claims were a major factor in the result. The very people Corbyn claims to represent are the one who will suffer most from Brexit. The useless twà t needs shooting.
You've been listening to Sky News/MSM/Zionist plot... rinse and repeat enough until the gullible buy it.
It's some achievement that argubly the most incompetent PM is still seen as a better choice than that useless SU President
The Countdown begins. on 22:55 - Jan 18 by Lohengrin
It’s probably fair to say that there is a widening gap (and that gap has always been there) between card-carrying members of The Labour Party and those who vote Labour. I was having this discussion last night funnily enough with a Labour member. We were having a drink after a funeral and he was quite taken aback by how vehemently most of those around the table were pro-Leave despite all of them having only ever voted Labour, he and they were miles apart in outlook.
Yet they'll still vote Labour. Until the populace demonstrate their disdain at the current set up then nothing will change
There needs to be a second referendum. Then if the vote is to remain they should still honour the result of the first referendum by officially leaving on March 29th and rejoining again 5 minutes later. The will of the people will well and truly be respected then. What could be more democratic? Brexit followed by Brentry.
The Countdown begins. on 18:58 - Jan 21 by longlostjack
There needs to be a second referendum. Then if the vote is to remain they should still honour the result of the first referendum by officially leaving on March 29th and rejoining again 5 minutes later. The will of the people will well and truly be respected then. What could be more democratic? Brexit followed by Brentry.
The Countdown begins. on 18:58 - Jan 21 by longlostjack
There needs to be a second referendum. Then if the vote is to remain they should still honour the result of the first referendum by officially leaving on March 29th and rejoining again 5 minutes later. The will of the people will well and truly be respected then. What could be more democratic? Brexit followed by Brentry.
And if the second is to leave, what happens then ?
The Prime Minister has just suggested that farmers in Wales wouldn’t mind a no deal Brexit. This is what NFU Cymru said in Sept: “the impact of a no-deal Brexit scenario on Welsh farming would be devastating.”
The Countdown begins. on 21:56 - Jan 21 by Kilkennyjack
The Prime Minister has just suggested that farmers in Wales wouldn’t mind a no deal Brexit. This is what NFU Cymru said in Sept: “the impact of a no-deal Brexit scenario on Welsh farming would be devastating.”
The Prime Minister to stand on the steps of Downing Street on 29th March this year and say we are leaving the EU today and then go onto say we will be having a new referendum on re-joining the EU later in the year [or announcing a General Election which can amount to the same thing as some parties will stand on a re-join the EU ticket and promise a new referendum].
So we will leave the EU as per the vote but might end up re-joining as per another vote, or it will be really done and dusted if the vote is another leave vote.
Is the above possible ?, I think it is the way to go as its a way out of this mess.
Continually being banned by Planet Swans for Porthcawl and then being reinstated.
Brilliant analysis here of the extent to which the EU actually "interferes" in UK law:
Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT"
There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research...
So, Vote Leave came up with 72 laws out of 34,105 that were imposed against the will of the UK government of the day - that's 0.2% of the UK legislature. When you look at the substance of these laws is there anyone out there who isn't a swivel-eyed Tory loon that can seriously argue that we have been terribly put upon by these eminently sensible laws?
The reason so many on the right of the Conservative parties hate these laws is that it restricts the opportunities for them and the people they represent to make a quick buck at the expense of the interests (often the health) of the likes of me and you. To think that anyone is gullible enough to believe any of the crap emanating from the mouths of these snake oil merchants.
3
The Countdown begins. on 13:25 - Jan 22 with 2441 views
The Countdown begins. on 12:33 - Jan 22 by BytholWyn
Brilliant analysis here of the extent to which the EU actually "interferes" in UK law:
Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT"
There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research...
So, Vote Leave came up with 72 laws out of 34,105 that were imposed against the will of the UK government of the day - that's 0.2% of the UK legislature. When you look at the substance of these laws is there anyone out there who isn't a swivel-eyed Tory loon that can seriously argue that we have been terribly put upon by these eminently sensible laws?
The reason so many on the right of the Conservative parties hate these laws is that it restricts the opportunities for them and the people they represent to make a quick buck at the expense of the interests (often the health) of the likes of me and you. To think that anyone is gullible enough to believe any of the crap emanating from the mouths of these snake oil merchants.
Repeat a lie often enough and the people will believe it.
The EU is an evil Frankenstein project seeking to control our sovereignty. The EU is a German plot to dominate Europe. The EU has banned bendy bananas. Leaving the EU will allow us to take back control of our borders.
The Countdown begins. on 13:25 - Jan 22 by longlostjack
Repeat a lie often enough and the people will believe it.
The EU is an evil Frankenstein project seeking to control our sovereignty. The EU is a German plot to dominate Europe. The EU has banned bendy bananas. Leaving the EU will allow us to take back control of our borders.
and one for the Corbynistas while we’re at it.
The EU is a slave to big business .
Come on. You're not trying to tell us that these are lies surely ?
0
The Countdown begins. on 23:28 - Jan 22 with 2297 views
Funny as feck seeing the southern Irish crapping themselves the nearer Brexit comes I thought they wanted less ties to Great Britain the fecking hypocrites.They will be the big losers in all this given the amount we buy off them and their geographical posistion.
[Post edited 23 Jan 2019 9:18]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
The Countdown begins. on 12:33 - Jan 22 by BytholWyn
Brilliant analysis here of the extent to which the EU actually "interferes" in UK law:
Brace for mega thread on "ALL THEM RULES INNIT"
There is a type of of brexiter who is motivated not by xenophobia, or Empire nostalgia, or buccaneering trade fantasies, but instead by "all them EU rules". Sadly they can never name a single one. So I have done some research...
So, Vote Leave came up with 72 laws out of 34,105 that were imposed against the will of the UK government of the day - that's 0.2% of the UK legislature. When you look at the substance of these laws is there anyone out there who isn't a swivel-eyed Tory loon that can seriously argue that we have been terribly put upon by these eminently sensible laws?
The reason so many on the right of the Conservative parties hate these laws is that it restricts the opportunities for them and the people they represent to make a quick buck at the expense of the interests (often the health) of the likes of me and you. To think that anyone is gullible enough to believe any of the crap emanating from the mouths of these snake oil merchants.
72 laws out of 34,105 is actually a lot less than 0.2%, it’s actually 0.002% and in terms of percentages makes it inconsequential.
0
The Countdown begins. on 16:55 - Jan 23 with 2158 views
The Countdown begins. on 16:21 - Jan 23 by majorraglan
72 laws out of 34,105 is actually a lot less than 0.2%, it’s actually 0.002% and in terms of percentages makes it inconsequential.
You forgot to multiply by 100 after dividing 34,105 into 72. Easy enough mistake to make - but your point stands, we're talking here about one law in 500 on the statute book that have been imposed by the EU. Take the first one listed in the thread - the EU insisting that food labels should say if Aspartine is present - because of the suspected cancer risk. I wonder what vested interest the government were representing when they opposed that particular law.
This tweet summed things up pretty nicely: "EU: additives to mineral water must be safe and labels must be honest (eg "spring water" has to come from an actual spring) UK: This will kill our sales of Dell-boy Trotter's "Peckham Spring Water"."
When it comes to regulation I have far more faith in both the EU and the Welsh government than the UK Parliament, especially with the Tories in charge.