By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
OUT WITH A DEAL EATING OUR CAKE AND LOVING IT suck it up remoaners
And like a typical anti democracy remoaner he decided the will of the people should be ignored the minute the democratic result was in total fecking hypocrite 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Despite it being voted in to law by the commons the spineless two faced remoaner MPs have totally abandoned any morals and decided to ignore the will of the British people.
It will be remembered and no election or referendum will ever be the same again in this country.
The one thing that will come is a massive surge in the popularity of UKIP or a similar party in the future who stand for the 52%.
Happy Days.
[Post edited 1 Jan 2021 14:13]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
The Countdown begins. on 13:20 - Mar 13 by westwalesed
It’s not about money it’s about sovereignty.
Oh right, must have imagined these arguments being made:-
"We pay billions more into the EU than we get out" "The EU is a protectionist racket for trade and pushes up the prices of our food" "We can do our own trade deals with the rest of the world, outside the high EU tariffs" "The EU will be broke soon, better to be out now.." "We can save money by not paying the extortionate £39B to the EU" "We can import food cheaper outside of the EU" "The fat cat bureaucrats in Brussels are over paid" "350m on the side of the bus"
[Post edited 13 Mar 2019 15:53]
2
The Countdown begins. on 13:53 - Mar 13 with 1824 views
What about the leave voters who wanted hard Brexit or a moderate Brexit or a Norway / Canada model. There’s no such thing as a leave voter in the singular. There are do many different types of Brexit.
The Countdown begins. on 13:47 - Mar 13 by bluey_the_blue
Whois reveals no details of who owns the domain name. Site owner doesn't make themselves known either - so who created it, who was behind the site and why are they so evasive?
The sit itself I doubt has become mainstream enough to independently assessed; it seems to have looked at government details, made the odd assumption without exposing it's methodology for calculating.
From the FAQ it urges you to use a JavaScript interface to see the calculation. Eh, my JavaScript is rusty so I'll come back to that.
From the site you can see the benefits of being in EU and whoda thunk it - a link for you to contact your MP. This takes to to https://hey-mp.uk - a site set up for you to work out your MP based upon supplied postcode ( not prone to abuse whatsoever ).
Entered a false postcode ( not having you stalkers turn up on my doorstep ) and voila...
Now it's become clear. Site telling people they don't really pay much to EU and hey isn't the EU really wonderful is a front organised by Best for Britain.
So why the secrecy on the euworthit.uk?
As i previously said, its either wright or wrong. There's no bias in the answer.
Thanks for telling me the author is probably a remainer, could have figured that much out myself. But the approach to calculation is open, and it acknowledges that the exact figure is likely to be different, but only by a very small amount.
0
The Countdown begin on 14:05 - Mar 13 with 1801 views
The Countdown begin on 13:58 - Mar 13 by union_jack
What about the leave voters who wanted hard Brexit or a moderate Brexit or a Norway / Canada model. There’s no such thing as a leave voter in the singular. There are do many different types of Brexit.
My point about democracy was referring to the democratic vote of the Labour Party to establish current policy, which is not ‘to get on with it’.
They are relying on boredom and people just giving up.
The Tories won’t step aside. And polls suggest they’re right not to do so. As, astonishingly, they are 10 points ahead of Labour, so we’ll just be back to where we are now,
I’d be happy (relatively) with the Brexit suggested by Labour. Although I find it amazing that remaining in all structures just with no vote is somehow ‘taking back control’.
The Countdown begin on 13:58 - Mar 13 by union_jack
What about the leave voters who wanted hard Brexit or a moderate Brexit or a Norway / Canada model. There’s no such thing as a leave voter in the singular. There are do many different types of Brexit.
Why would we pay the same to be a rule taker and still ne subject to what we are now?
The Countdown begins. on 11:43 - Mar 13 by exiledclaseboy
That referendum was on AV+ which isn’t proportional representation and in some extreme cases can actually make the lack of proportionality worse. The commitment to proper PR was one of the many policies the libdems abandoned or watered down in their rush to share power with Cameron. AV+ was rejected because a - it was crap, b - it was only marginally better than the current shambles of a system and c - because it was so closely associated with the libdems, who everyone hated.
At the time the Lib Dem’s were everyone’s second favourite party which would have put them permanently in coalition government under AV. It’s no wonder they pushed for it so hard.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
I get Yvette Cooper is trying to leapfrog Starmer in terms of wanting to succeed Corbyn but is she even close to reality?
Wants to know what default position is. Errm, the default position is leaving under WTO rules as per Article 50 - the same Article 50 invocation she herself voted for.
"oh, but that would be terribly bad... what's the default position?"
[Post edited 13 Mar 2019 17:33]
-1
The Countdown begins. on 18:50 - Mar 13 with 1557 views
The Countdown begins. on 17:32 - Mar 13 by bluey_the_blue
I get Yvette Cooper is trying to leapfrog Starmer in terms of wanting to succeed Corbyn but is she even close to reality?
Wants to know what default position is. Errm, the default position is leaving under WTO rules as per Article 50 - the same Article 50 invocation she herself voted for.
"oh, but that would be terribly bad... what's the default position?"
[Post edited 13 Mar 2019 17:33]
Well today Corbyn called for a GE (Groundhog Day), Redwood supported no deal (Groundhog Day), Liz Truss supported May's Deal (Groundhog Day), Yvette Cooper went on and and on about no no deal (Groundhog Day), Hilary Benn spoke about a second vote (Groundhog Day), Stephan Gethins talkabout remaining (Groundhog Day) NONE OF THE FOOKERS GET IT.
GUESS WHAT THEY WILL TALK ABOUT TOMORROW?
PS I understand that Boris has made a tawt of himself today (Groundhog Day)
Well, despite many on social media celebrating prematurely, "no deal" remains on the table.
Quick question though ( and I guess ECB may know as it seems to me to be civil service type wonkery ) - should Parliament change the law to explicitly rule out "no deal", would EU also have to change their rules to accomodate that?
-1
The Countdown begins. on 19:26 - Mar 13 with 1526 views
The Countdown begins. on 19:24 - Mar 13 by bluey_the_blue
Well, despite many on social media celebrating prematurely, "no deal" remains on the table.
Quick question though ( and I guess ECB may know as it seems to me to be civil service type wonkery ) - should Parliament change the law to explicitly rule out "no deal", would EU also have to change their rules to accomodate that?
You couldn't make this shite up honestly. A clear majority of 4..... but a clear majority of 4% of the Brexit vote doesn't count. Democracy at its best eh...
0
The Countdown begins. on 19:45 - Mar 13 with 1477 views
The Countdown begins. on 19:38 - Mar 13 by Luther27
You couldn't make this shite up honestly. A clear majority of 4..... but a clear majority of 4% of the Brexit vote doesn't count. Democracy at its best eh...
It changes nothing.
With or without a deal, we leave 29th March.
-1
The Countdown begins. on 19:45 - Mar 13 with 1476 views
The Countdown begins. on 19:24 - Mar 13 by bluey_the_blue
Well, despite many on social media celebrating prematurely, "no deal" remains on the table.
Quick question though ( and I guess ECB may know as it seems to me to be civil service type wonkery ) - should Parliament change the law to explicitly rule out "no deal", would EU also have to change their rules to accomodate that?
The Countdown begins. on 19:45 - Mar 13 by exiledclaseboy
No european law changes needed.
Doesn't Article 50 work both ways though - after activating, two years to get withdrawal agreement. So wouldn't the 29th March date apply to both parties, ie EU can enforce leaving with no deal?
-1
The Countdown begins. on 19:48 - Mar 13 with 1462 views