By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
OUT WITH A DEAL EATING OUR CAKE AND LOVING IT suck it up remoaners
And like a typical anti democracy remoaner he decided the will of the people should be ignored the minute the democratic result was in total fecking hypocrite 😂😂😂😂😂😂
Despite it being voted in to law by the commons the spineless two faced remoaner MPs have totally abandoned any morals and decided to ignore the will of the British people.
It will be remembered and no election or referendum will ever be the same again in this country.
The one thing that will come is a massive surge in the popularity of UKIP or a similar party in the future who stand for the 52%.
Happy Days.
[Post edited 1 Jan 2021 14:13]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
Not really Brexit related. But that does fly in the face of the argument of nationalising our railways. Because British Rail F'ed it up years ago, privatization seems the only option left available to us, forgetting that TfL does an absolutely brilliant job. The reality now is that we have French, German and possibly now China government owned company running our services, and using the profits to subsidise their own services back home.
There's also the other argument that with the world adopting the capitalist model, old fashioned warfare for world domination is obsolete because it is not as profitable as it used to be. China can roll tanks into California and it will only gain a load of silicone chips. It would be more profitable if china let the California economy thrive, and buy out its best tech companies.
[Post edited 28 Jun 2018 9:37]
-1
The Countdown begins. on 10:13 - Jun 28 with 3578 views
"But most importantly of all, this is a decision for the long term future of the country. The question is not whether the world’s fifth largest economy could prosper outside the EU — of course it could — but whether we should tie ourselves to a union whose ambitions are so very different from our own. Maybe our future governments will be able to protect Britain from the worst of them. But why take the risk?"
Yeah, why take the risk with an ongoing union when our companies could just move there!
I wonder what he gets out of all this?
0
The Countdown begins. on 16:14 - Jun 28 with 3511 views
Trump is trying to destabilize the European Union by Josh Rogin
Washington Post, June 28 at 7:14 PM
As President Trump heads to Europe next month for the NATO summit and then a historic meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin, his personal attacks on the European Union and other pillars of the Western order are overshadowing his own administration’s attempts to reassure allies that the United States still believes in the transatlantic project it has led since the 1940s.
During a private meeting at the White House in late April, Trump was discussing trade with French President Emmanuel Macron. At one point, he asked Macron, “Why don’t you leave the E.U.?” and said that if France exited the union, Trump would offer it a bilateral trade deal with better terms than the E.U. as a whole gets from the United States, according to two European officials. The White House did not dispute the officials’ account, but declined to comment.
Let’s set aside for a moment the point that Trump’s proposal reveals a basic lack of understanding of Macron’s views and those of the people who elected him. This is an instance of the president of the United States offering an incentive to dismantle an organization of America’s allies, against stated U.S. government policy.
Trump has been publicly trashing the E.U. and NATO since his campaign, but the pace and viciousness of his attacks have increased. Just this week, at a rally in North Dakota, Trump said: “The European Union, of course, was set up to take advantage of the United States, to attack our piggy bank.” He then complained about a $150 billion trade deficit with the E.U., inflating the figure.
Other reports note that Trump recently told Group of Seven leaders that “NATO is as bad as NAFTA,” suggested to the Swedish prime minister that America should leave the NATO alliance , and launched gratuitous public attacks on German Chancellor Angela Merkel at her weakest moment. It’s a deepening trend that leads to an unavoidable conclusion: Trump doesn’t believe in the continued sanctity of the European Union and NATO, as well as the United States’ commitment to both.
Trump defenders often say he is simply throwing out ideas to see what sticks. Some say his motives are primarily political and domestic – or that he is more talk than action. Many cling to the hope that the president’s top diplomatic and military officials can still execute sound policy, reassure allies, manage Trump and head off any real catastrophe.
That was plausible during Trump’s first year in office, and European allies were relatively reassured. But during his second year, so far, Trump has shrugged off previous constraints. His new national security team can only try to tamp down fears and attempt to merge Trump’s “America First” mantra with a responsible strategy.
During an interview this week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said the president is trying to “reset” the liberal world order, not dismantle it. Trump is being “disruptive” to force allies to agree to reforms needed to reflect U.S. interests, he argued. Assistant Secretary of State Wess Mitchell called Trump’s approach “strategic renovation” during a speech last week in Brussels . Mitchell argued that tackling disagreements such as trade head-on can strengthen the alliance for the strategic competition with Russia and China that lies ahead.
But these efforts to reassure Europe are failing. European officials no longer believe Trump’s words can be discounted. They don’t see the alliance rift as routine or temporary. They don’t believe it’s possible to repair the transatlantic bridge in the middle of a Trump-sized earthquake. European countries have no choice but to hedge and seek alternatives to U.S. leadership.
“If you look at the world today, you realize the position of the West is going to be contested for the first time in several centuries,” former British prime minister Tony Blair told me. “And if the West if is disunited, it’s going to be much less capable of withstanding that challenge.”
If Europe doesn’t feel the United States is really on its side, the risk is that individual European nations turn to other geopolitical forces, and this is bad for America, Blair added.
Of course, Trump’s opinions closely track those of Putin, including on the status of Crimea, aid to Ukraine and Russia’s interference in the U.S. elections. Overall, Trump’s attack on the E.U. and the U.S.-Europe relationship is a huge strategic windfall for Russia.
“As long as there is a unified Europe that maintains a liberal international order with basic rules of the road, it is a disaster for a dictator like Putin,” former vice president Joe Biden told me. “That’s why Putin is doing what he’s doing.”
The United States and Europe have had disputes before. It’s possible this one will get resolved eventually. Meanwhile, Trump is doing enormous and unnecessary damage. His intentional and egregious actions to undermine the E.U., NATO and the United States’ relationship with both can no longer be discounted, rationalized or seen as anything but what they are – a brazen attempt to undo the strategic infrastructure both America and Europe need more than ever.
Oh my I can't wait! in 39 weeks to be exact all immigrants and darkies will suddenly go through a spontaneous combustion and fade into the air,Women will know their place in the kitchen..And for the LGBT folks..I don't what's that..they never existed in the first place..just a EU conspiracy to undermine our Christian values.
Total silence from the remoaners about Great Britain 🇬🇧 beating the EU to the £20 Billion Australian contract but hey we all know they are gutted about ANY good news since they only like negative news.
39 WEEKS AND FECKING LOVING IT
SUCK IT UP YOU REMOANER LOSERS NOT LONG NOW AND WE ARE OUT
DEMOCRACY WILL BE SERVED LIKE IT OR NOT
[Post edited 29 Jun 2018 8:54]
OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS
🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧 🇬🇧
Total silence from the remoaners about Great Britain 🇬🇧 beating the EU to the £20 Billion Australian contract but hey we all know they are gutted about ANY good news since they only like negative news.
39 WEEKS AND FECKING LOVING IT
SUCK IT UP YOU REMOANER LOSERS NOT LONG NOW AND WE ARE OUT
DEMOCRACY WILL BE SERVED LIKE IT OR NOT
[Post edited 29 Jun 2018 8:54]
A lot of Brexiteers bragging about the £20bn BAE contract to build some ships for Australia and hailing it a "Brexit success." Problem with that is that France currently has a £28 billion deal with Australia to build their submarines.
Total silence from the remoaners about Great Britain 🇬🇧 beating the EU to the £20 Billion Australian contract but hey we all know they are gutted about ANY good news since they only like negative news.
39 WEEKS AND FECKING LOVING IT
SUCK IT UP YOU REMOANER LOSERS NOT LONG NOW AND WE ARE OUT
DEMOCRACY WILL BE SERVED LIKE IT OR NOT
[Post edited 29 Jun 2018 8:54]
That's great. If only we could have done stuff like this when we were in the EU.
0
The Countdown begins. on 10:35 - Jun 29 with 3280 views