| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking 20:15 - Dec 20 with 8125 views | NeathJack |
I don't just mean being informed 5 mins before everyone else but actually asked to weigh in on the decision.
In these time of such good faith between them and the board. |  | | |  |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:18 - Dec 20 with 3244 views | Jack_Kass |
I demand instant resignation of the board if they didn't.
Either that or hand over details of your family tree, going back to the time of Sweyn Forkbeard, which will get you off, for now.. |  |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:18 - Dec 20 with 3238 views | TheResurrection |
Exactly, Paul,
Especially when Alan Lewis decided to put a big statement out on behalf of the 1 fifth shareholder.
Pathetic, Alan, pathetic, and just shows how out of touch you are with your slowly, slowly catchy fack all monkey, you are
Step down immediately.
You have no mandate to continuously be so useless |  |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:21 - Dec 20 with 3173 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:19 - Dec 20 by londonlisa2001 |
Me too.
Not that I'm as elevated as Clasie of course... |
Tish and pish. |  |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:24 - Dec 20 with 3105 views | Thornburyswan |
No need to consult the trust, inform them moments before releasing yes but no need to ask their opinion. | | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:25 - Dec 20 with 3084 views | Oldjack |
Why would they inform the nothings ? |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:25 - Dec 20 with 3072 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:24 - Dec 20 by Thornburyswan |
No need to consult the trust, inform them moments before releasing yes but no need to ask their opinion. |
The trust owns one fifth of the club. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:25 - Dec 20 with 3064 views | TheResurrection |
Email to Alan Lewis sent right now.....
Hi Alan,
I think this is the ideal time for all parties and all concerned to call it a day.
I thank you for your 8 years service where you pretty much allowed yourselves another term, but the time is right, now, to relieve yourself of your position, and the others and let new, more dynamic people have a chance at bettering the fortunes of our club
You have embarrassed yourself with your statement tonight on the same night as Clement being also relieved of his duties.
Do not embarrass yourself any further and offer your resignation immediately please
Thanks
Chris. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:25 - Dec 20 with 3065 views | Yossarian |
Well I think we can say with a fair amount of certainty:
1. The Trust were not informed - let alone consulted
2. The Yanks have got someone in place - probably someone else who hasn't a clue about 'The Swansea Way'
3. This is a cynical move to deflect attention from them, and Jenkins - only the incurably stupid will think this will resolve the institutional rot within the club |  |
| "Yossarian- the very sight of the name made him shudder.There were so many esses in it. It just had to be subversive" (Catch 22) |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:26 - Dec 20 with 3059 views | monmouth |
If Stu knew, he's really stitched up Al's big intro.
And if he didn't..... |  |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 with 2967 views | exiledclaseboy |
Trust board member Cath Dyer speaking in SSN now. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 with 2965 views | Thornburyswan |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:25 - Dec 20 by exiledclaseboy |
The trust owns one fifth of the club. |
Exactly, a reason to inform/advise them NOT consult/ask them. | | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 with 2958 views | TheResurrection |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:26 - Dec 20 by monmouth |
If Stu knew, he's really stitched up Al's big intro.
And if he didn't..... |
Exactly and as embarrassing as they are this has hit new all time low levels tonight.
And people wonder, people like Phil Sumbler wonder why we question the goings on there...
Phil, park it up FFS. You and your little group. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:35 - Dec 20 with 2889 views | NeathJack |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 by exiledclaseboy |
Trust board member Cath Dyer speaking in SSN now. |
What did she say? | | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:35 - Dec 20 with 2885 views | Phil_S |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 by TheResurrection |
Exactly and as embarrassing as they are this has hit new all time low levels tonight.
And people wonder, people like Phil Sumbler wonder why we question the goings on there...
Phil, park it up FFS. You and your little group. |
Park what up? |  | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:36 - Dec 20 with 2849 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:31 - Dec 20 by exiledclaseboy |
Trust board member Cath Dyer speaking in SSN now. |
Were you as a board member consulted over what the Trust's reaction should be? I know I didn't see anything.
I thought it was collective? | | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:37 - Dec 20 with 2837 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:35 - Dec 20 by NeathJack |
What did she say? |
I only caugh5 the tail end of it. Usual stuff. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:37 - Dec 20 with 2832 views | Darran |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:35 - Dec 20 by Phil_S |
Park what up? |
You’ve had to give the helicopter back haven’t you? |  |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:39 - Dec 20 with 2798 views | Yossarian |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:36 - Dec 20 by londonlisa2001 |
Were you as a board member consulted over what the Trust's reaction should be? I know I didn't see anything.
I thought it was collective? |
Amateurish and only adds to the contempt for the Trust that is going to be very difficult (but not impossible) to put right. | |
| "Yossarian- the very sight of the name made him shudder.There were so many esses in it. It just had to be subversive" (Catch 22) |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:39 - Dec 20 with 2792 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:36 - Dec 20 by londonlisa2001 |
Were you as a board member consulted over what the Trust's reaction should be? I know I didn't see anything.
I thought it was collective? |
I was not. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:39 - Dec 20 with 2788 views | Jack_Kass |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:35 - Dec 20 by NeathJack |
What did she say? |
 | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:46 - Dec 20 with 2705 views | NeathJack |
Did Cath Dyer really say "We have to trust the board" as stated on another thread? | | | |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:50 - Dec 20 with 2657 views | monmouth |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:46 - Dec 20 by NeathJack |
Did Cath Dyer really say "We have to trust the board" as stated on another thread? |
What a chance to just state a fact. this is the fifth manager in a row appointed by Huw Jenkins that we have had to pay off, most of them after a few months of being given a new contract.
Stick the boot in FFS. Stop being patsies. | |
| |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:51 - Dec 20 with 2626 views | vetchonian |
| Were the Trust consulted over Clement sacking on 20:46 - Dec 20 by NeathJack |
Did Cath Dyer really say "We have to trust the board" as stated on another thread? |
Or was it "in Huw we trust" | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
