| Banning 18:41 - Mar 28 with 2301 views | Neath_Jack |
Right then, i know we have many pussies on here, who approve of giving out bans to people they don't agree with, or say nasty things...
What do readers think of Mr Tommy Robinson being banned from Twitter today?
Now read the question again, it doesn't ask whether you like him, or his views, just whether he should be banned for his views. |  |
| |  |
| Banning on 18:43 - Mar 28 with 1539 views | magicdaps10 |
Banned.
He thinks he his right but is totally wrong. Doesnt think of other people except himself.
Deserved a banning with that attitude. |  |
| |
| Banning on 18:46 - Mar 28 with 1513 views | Jackfath |
| Banning on 18:43 - Mar 28 by magicdaps10 |
Banned.
He thinks he his right but is totally wrong. Doesnt think of other people except himself.
Deserved a banning with that attitude. |
He should use his other username. |  |
| |
| Banning on 18:47 - Mar 28 with 1518 views | Highjack |
Of course he shouldn't.
Three journalists have also been detained and banned from entering the UK this week under the 'anti terrorism act' because they intended to interview him. |  |
| |
| Banning on 18:48 - Mar 28 with 1511 views | Neath_Jack |
| Banning on 18:43 - Mar 28 by magicdaps10 |
Banned.
He thinks he his right but is totally wrong. Doesnt think of other people except himself.
Deserved a banning with that attitude. |
He deserves to be banned, because he thinks he's right?
When you are carrying out your work, do you think you've done it wrong all the time? When you give advice to people, to you believe you are giving them the wrong answer? | |
| |
| Banning on 18:50 - Mar 28 with 1496 views | Swanjaxs |
War Baby was a classic 👠|  |
| |
| Banning on 18:51 - Mar 28 with 1489 views | jack2jack |
What's twitter and who the flying fvck is Tommy Robinson! |  | | |
| Banning on 18:53 - Mar 28 with 1480 views | DJack |
random thoughts...
No RIGHT to "free speech" in the UK. Even though the US has a right to free speech it does not extend to platforms owned/operated by private companies so it is a legitimate option for Twitter. Am I happy with that...not entirely. |  |
| It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring. - Carl Sagan |
| |
| Banning on 18:57 - Mar 28 with 1462 views | Humpty |
| Banning on 18:47 - Mar 28 by Highjack |
Of course he shouldn't.
Three journalists have also been detained and banned from entering the UK this week under the 'anti terrorism act' because they intended to interview him. |
They're about as much journalists as Jayda Fransen and her hubby are. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Banning on 19:02 - Mar 28 with 1442 views | DrGonzo |
I think the right to free speech shouldn't be messed with. The social media companies lean massively to the left so there's no big surprise.
Free speech is one thing though. You can't go around being a massive racists and inciting race hate so I haven't much pity. Leave himself looking like a silly little fool for as long as he likes. |  | | |
| Banning on 19:07 - Mar 28 with 1427 views | magicdaps10 |
| Banning on 18:48 - Mar 28 by Neath_Jack |
He deserves to be banned, because he thinks he's right?
When you are carrying out your work, do you think you've done it wrong all the time? When you give advice to people, to you believe you are giving them the wrong answer? |
He has some very good points.
He goes to far with things but there is no reasoning with him. I dont believe what he stands for.
I dont know what he done to get banned but I could imagine. The country is going to pot but its not all down to what he believes.
Cant compare my line of work with his. | |
| |
| Banning on 19:10 - Mar 28 with 1409 views | Neath_Jack |
| Banning on 19:07 - Mar 28 by magicdaps10 |
He has some very good points.
He goes to far with things but there is no reasoning with him. I dont believe what he stands for.
I dont know what he done to get banned but I could imagine. The country is going to pot but its not all down to what he believes.
Cant compare my line of work with his. |
So you don’t know what he was banned for, but you ageee with it anyway?
That’s a very closed mind you have daps. | |
| |
| Banning on 19:11 - Mar 28 with 1402 views | Swanjaxs |
| Banning on 19:07 - Mar 28 by magicdaps10 |
He has some very good points.
He goes to far with things but there is no reasoning with him. I dont believe what he stands for.
I dont know what he done to get banned but I could imagine. The country is going to pot but its not all down to what he believes.
Cant compare my line of work with his. |
A racist wannabe football hooligan.... good riddance | |
| |
| Banning on 19:16 - Mar 28 with 1377 views | magicdaps10 |
| Banning on 19:10 - Mar 28 by Neath_Jack |
So you don’t know what he was banned for, but you ageee with it anyway?
That’s a very closed mind you have daps. |
Ban him because he is a clown. There are impressionable kids on there and they have to read the rubbish he puts on there.
Same category as Katie Hopkins, mindless attention seekers.
I am very open minded and think of the people involved in the wider picture that Robinson paints so badly of. | |
| |
| Banning on 19:24 - Mar 28 with 1352 views | Gwyn737 |
I'm not comfortable with twitter being a moral arbiter.
I certainly don't agree with Robinson's views, however, there is something more honest in him being up front with his profile. I much prefer that to one of the Britain First "Like this post if you think the veteran in the photo deserves looking after" click bait. |  | | |
| Banning on 19:28 - Mar 28 with 1330 views | Highjack |
| Banning on 18:57 - Mar 28 by Humpty |
They're about as much journalists as Jayda Fransen and her hubby are. |
Their ability as journalists is irrelevant. It's not what the anti terrorism act should be used for. It's a dangerous step, and also quite ironic that jihadists who actively fought for Isis in Syria can just walk back in no questions asked. | |
| |
| Banning on 19:34 - Mar 28 with 1318 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
What’s he said ?
Being a leftie commie snowflake ,sometimes I do agree with what he says , he’s not all there to be honest and why did he change his name ?
That Katie Hopkins is the spawn of the devil though |  |
| |
| Banning on 19:49 - Mar 28 with 1272 views | STID2017 |
It's not a straightforward question.
If he were just keeping his views to himself or his few cronies then fine.
When he is spreading his White Supremacist propaganda in such a way that it may, potentially cause tension and upheaval, then surely he is inciting racial hatred and therefore deserving of a ban?
On that basis, I vote yes |  |
| |
| Banning on 19:57 - Mar 28 with 1247 views | Highjack |
| Banning on 19:49 - Mar 28 by STID2017 |
It's not a straightforward question.
If he were just keeping his views to himself or his few cronies then fine.
When he is spreading his White Supremacist propaganda in such a way that it may, potentially cause tension and upheaval, then surely he is inciting racial hatred and therefore deserving of a ban?
On that basis, I vote yes |
On the flip side though if he's on Twitter then thousands or millions of people who don't agree with him can offer an alternative opinion .
By banning him you are driving him underground into a bubble and automatically handing him a "establishment is censoring me" underdog brucie bonus card, which he will now use to his full extent. | |
| |
| Banning on 19:58 - Mar 28 with 1245 views | magicdaps10 |
His views are racial the majority of the time, he goes to far with it.
Everyone is allowed a view or opinion but if it goes to far then it has to be stopped, he goes to far to often. | |
| |
| Banning on 20:16 - Mar 28 with 1199 views | Darran |
He’s a cùnt but he shouldn’t be banned from Twitter.
On a side note it baffles me why grown ups follow these types and then complain about them,Katie Hopkins is another one. Why the fuçk would an adult follow her! |  |
| |
| Banning on 20:26 - Mar 28 with 1178 views | exiledclaseboy |
Banning him is counter productive. No one apart from the already converted takes the dopey prick seriously and banning him just allows him to bleat that he’s been silenced by “the pee cee brigade”. You don’t invalidate opposing views by silencing them. |  |
| |
| Banning on 20:26 - Mar 28 with 1178 views | Highjack |
| Banning on 20:16 - Mar 28 by Darran |
He’s a cùnt but he shouldn’t be banned from Twitter.
On a side note it baffles me why grown ups follow these types and then complain about them,Katie Hopkins is another one. Why the fuçk would an adult follow her! |
Most of the people who follow Katie Hopkins are probably lefties who can't wait for her to post something so they can jump in with a riposte and gain sjw Twitter points. | |
| |
| Banning on 20:27 - Mar 28 with 1165 views | Darran |
| Banning on 20:26 - Mar 28 by Highjack |
Most of the people who follow Katie Hopkins are probably lefties who can't wait for her to post something so they can jump in with a riposte and gain sjw Twitter points. |
You’re probably right I’m sure Ebo follows her. | |
| |
| Banning on 20:28 - Mar 28 with 1157 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Banning on 20:26 - Mar 28 by Highjack |
Most of the people who follow Katie Hopkins are probably lefties who can't wait for her to post something so they can jump in with a riposte and gain sjw Twitter points. |
Where’s the fun in surrounding yourself only with views you agree with though? | |
| |
| Banning on 20:29 - Mar 28 with 1154 views | oh_tommy_tommy |
| Banning on 20:26 - Mar 28 by Highjack |
Most of the people who follow Katie Hopkins are probably lefties who can't wait for her to post something so they can jump in with a riposte and gain sjw Twitter points. |
I’d think you’d find most people who follow her agree with her. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
