By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
It means that the members of this forum say that “value is determined by what someone is willing to pay” it is something you also repeated on this thread. Burnley were willing to pay £8m.
Transfermarkt- of course it is the case. It is being used for the purchase prices. The point I made wasn’t about the sale prices, my point was about what they are worth.
It’s very straight forward.
[Post edited 16 Aug 2018 11:44]
"It means that the members of this forum say that “value is determined what someone is willing to pay”
I'm sorry, which members? Let's have a list and let's make it a long list as you would need at least more than 50% of posters to agree with YOUR definition to make it a forum definition. Back yourself dickhead, names, now.
Don't try and put words into my mouth. Everyone reading understands what I have said, I have made my argument clearly. You demean yourself.
It is very straight forward. The market concluded that as of the 9th of August 2018 Clucas was worth £6m. Mesa held his value better over the course of 1 season despite Clucas having a number of advantages, and you my mentally challenged chum, are wrong.
"It means that the members of this forum say that “value is determined what someone is willing to pay”
I'm sorry, which members? Let's have a list and let's make it a long list as you would need at least more than 50% of posters to agree with YOUR definition to make it a forum definition. Back yourself dickhead, names, now.
Don't try and put words into my mouth. Everyone reading understands what I have said, I have made my argument clearly. You demean yourself.
It is very straight forward. The market concluded that as of the 9th of August 2018 Clucas was worth £6m. Mesa held his value better over the course of 1 season despite Clucas having a number of advantages, and you my mentally challenged chum, are wrong.
I am still waiting for you to tell me where I disrespected our cup win
You agree with the definition. You claimed it a few pages back or so, you can’t now change your mind because you realise you were wrong.
Doesn’t work like that.
Yeah, well, as you may remember, you have become the forum definition of a prick.
I've enjoyed tying you up in knots with your own logic, my work here is done, you will of course have the last word and kid yourself that this means that you have "won" and the majority don't see what a prick you are. Again you would be wrong.
Can someone please make up a sticky thread for these two children to carry on their petulant arguments under one topic rather than spoil countless other ones.
Yeah, well, as you may remember, you have become the forum definition of a prick.
I've enjoyed tying you up in knots with your own logic, my work here is done, you will of course have the last word and kid yourself that this means that you have "won" and the majority don't see what a prick you are. Again you would be wrong.
Good day.
Happy to be a prick if I am an corrwct one. Which I am.
Surely you have done the opposite of tied anyone up in their own logic.
My logic is that value is determined by what someone is prepared to pay. Just as yours is too. Burnley were prepared to pay £8m.
Looks like the only one you have tied up in their own logic is ourself.
Can someone please make up a sticky thread for these two children to carry on their petulant arguments under one topic rather than spoil countless other ones.
Are you new here or something? As long as E20 posts on this site threads will be turned into this, that's what he does. He is the constant factor. That is why somebody put up a poll here asking for him to be banned.
I didn't vote and don't want to see anyone banned, I prefer to tie pricks like E20 up in their own logic...and as that is now thoroughly done I have already stated in my post above that this thread is over for me.
Last thing, the truth is elusive, life is full of grey and in many areas opinion and perspective of different people make agreement difficult. Therefore what can be defined as true is precious and must be defended, you can't let pricks like E20 get away with claiming black is white...otherwise, if enough people follow they will be led to wrong conclusions and not truly understand why.
This is also why Donald Trump is a c*nt and Putin etc.
Are you new here or something? As long as E20 posts on this site threads will be turned into this, that's what he does. He is the constant factor. That is why somebody put up a poll here asking for him to be banned.
I didn't vote and don't want to see anyone banned, I prefer to tie pricks like E20 up in their own logic...and as that is now thoroughly done I have already stated in my post above that this thread is over for me.
Last thing, the truth is elusive, life is full of grey and in many areas opinion and perspective of different people make agreement difficult. Therefore what can be defined as true is precious and must be defended, you can't let pricks like E20 get away with claiming black is white...otherwise, if enough people follow they will be led to wrong conclusions and not truly understand why.
This is also why Donald Trump is a c*nt and Putin etc.
Huh? I just corrected you because you said we had 1 centre back. You then went a bit mental and started bringing up correct quotes about Sam Clucas and then saying I was spelling a word wrong that you layer realised I wasn’t all because of the pain it caused you to admit I was correct.
I am the constant factor of sense. That then sparks the constant factor of frustrated rubbish which gets shared out among my and base. Currently it is your turn.
My logic is that as we both agree Sam Clucas is worth what someone is prepared to pay which means he was worth £8m and thus held his value better. Your the one who has tied yourself up in your own logic as you now contradict yourself that value is not determined by that. My point has remained constant... and remained correct.
Have we not got any moderators any more? Far too many threads are being taken up with nonsense arguing between members and nothing being done about it.
Absolutely no surprise that the forum has gone down the swanny and the decent supporters are inactive.
Happy to put myself forward as a mod if it means getting the forum back on track. This is farcical at the moment ffs.
Have we not got any moderators any more? Far too many threads are being taken up with nonsense arguing between members and nothing being done about it.
Absolutely no surprise that the forum has gone down the swanny and the decent supporters are inactive.
Happy to put myself forward as a mod if it means getting the forum back on track. This is farcical at the moment ffs.
I vote for this guy.
The sooner this nonsense of the fan club derailing theads because they cannot face their hero being correct needs to be stamped out.
I have the stamina of Paula Radcliffe and Mo Farrah put together so I could go on forever pinging these trolls away left right and centre (correct spelling) - but can’t be fun for the rest of the forum.
He is not the one to blame, everyone else is in the wrong!!
He is always right, the intellectual better of most men on here.........not arrogant, not ignorant but just better. He carries on NOT due to addiction or being a egomaniac BUT to teach the less intellectual to his way of thinking!
There is no reasoning with fact, he is fact.........opinion does not exist in his world.
He is not the one to blame, everyone else is in the wrong!!
He is always right, the intellectual better of most men on here.........not arrogant, not ignorant but just better. He carries on NOT due to addiction or being a egomaniac BUT to teach the less intellectual to his way of thinking!
There is no reasoning with fact, he is fact.........opinion does not exist in his world.
Well that is the most sensible post you have made in a long time.
Although a small point of correction, “everyone else is in the wrong” is not the case at all. The usual morons that follow me around the forum taking things off topic and trying desperately to draw me into arguments by doctoring historical off topic quotes are on the wrong.
Thankfully they are in the minority. There is about 8 or so. But they ruin threads in the process so can feel like more.
Apart from that though, of the bits I read, you are spot in.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
