| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy 13:44 - Sep 29 with 13063 views | _ |
Just a kid who made a mistake. He could be a very decent option for us.
Come on City. |  |
| |  |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:40 - Oct 1 with 983 views | Darran |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:25 - Oct 1 by shandyjack |
players will know the team 1/2 days before the game as they will be training in the shape etc in prep for the game. If someone is leaking the team could be doing it 24/48 hrs before kick off. To suggest someone is calling him 90+ mins before the game on that day is crazy.
I remember back in the day that the Friday evening post would display the team, and would be correct 90%+ of the times.
It's quite possible that he is just making an educated guess of the team |
No he’s very not. |  |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:45 - Oct 1 with 970 views | Shaky |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:03 - Oct 1 by _ |
You've made a career out of thinking you're one step ahead of the rest but this latest revelation is no doubt as fanciful and dreamt up as all your others, including your self acclaimed genius title in the world of finance.
And I've got proof, reams and reams of whatsapp messages and emails from you where you pretty much accuse half the posters on here of being either involved with the club, someone other than they're appearing to be or picking on you.
I can't help you and frankly speaking I doubt anyone could. |
Sad little old woman, whispering things he had heard on WhattsApp.
Is that how Mr Jenkins and his team send you their talking points?
Shame you are unable to think of anything worthwhile to say yourself, eBoy. |  |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:00 - Oct 1 with 952 views | _ |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:45 - Oct 1 by Shaky |
Sad little old woman, whispering things he had heard on WhattsApp.
Is that how Mr Jenkins and his team send you their talking points?
Shame you are unable to think of anything worthwhile to say yourself, eBoy. |
No, they're not. I will say this in broken English in the very hope it will sink in.
I have never spoken or met with Huw Jenkins or anyone else for that matter, apart from Dineen in 2014, of course and then I came back on here with a full transcript.
And Shakes, darling..... HE'S BEHIND YOU.....!!!!!!!
| |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:39 - Oct 1 with 930 views | Shaky |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:00 - Oct 1 by _ |
No, they're not. I will say this in broken English in the very hope it will sink in.
I have never spoken or met with Huw Jenkins or anyone else for that matter, apart from Dineen in 2014, of course and then I came back on here with a full transcript.
And Shakes, darling..... HE'S BEHIND YOU.....!!!!!!!
|
Is that a fact?
Well people will then have to make up their whether you a lying now, or were lying when you said you got a load of insider information 'from the man himself' a few months ago.
Or whether you are simply full shit, and like Dim change your positions as frequently as you change your underpants. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:53 - Oct 1 with 920 views | _ |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:39 - Oct 1 by Shaky |
Is that a fact?
Well people will then have to make up their whether you a lying now, or were lying when you said you got a load of insider information 'from the man himself' a few months ago.
Or whether you are simply full shit, and like Dim change your positions as frequently as you change your underpants. |
What?? Haha...
What man himself and where have I said I get a lot of insider information?
I did get bits and bobs though but that source has now dried up, he's left the club.
I told enough people about who this was on here though and have got the messages to prove it.
What can you prove Shakes eh? You are just completely full of shit. Literally | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:55 - Oct 1 with 917 views | magicdaps10 |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:25 - Oct 1 by shandyjack |
players will know the team 1/2 days before the game as they will be training in the shape etc in prep for the game. If someone is leaking the team could be doing it 24/48 hrs before kick off. To suggest someone is calling him 90+ mins before the game on that day is crazy.
I remember back in the day that the Friday evening post would display the team, and would be correct 90%+ of the times.
It's quite possible that he is just making an educated guess of the team |
Was quite a plausible explanation for the Res until I read the word educated.
By the way
Still not had a answer to my question. |  |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:04 - Oct 1 with 907 views | Shaky |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 16:53 - Oct 1 by _ |
What?? Haha...
What man himself and where have I said I get a lot of insider information?
I did get bits and bobs though but that source has now dried up, he's left the club.
I told enough people about who this was on here though and have got the messages to prove it.
What can you prove Shakes eh? You are just completely full of shit. Literally |
That standard of proof required here is not the same as is needed in a criminal court.
Nevertheless for the majority of posters here you have clearly been convicted 'beyond any reasonable doubt'.
And that is not going to change no matter how many reacharounds Dim gives you. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:17 - Oct 1 with 890 views | Dewi1jack |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 15:39 - Sep 30 by _ |
Pathetic post. |
How is it pathetic?
Don't you think our lads are in with a shout of gaining promotion or winning the FA Cup then?
So much for lecturing others about having faith in them .
You obviously don't when we're only 10 games in and averaging 1.6 points a game, meaning we'll be around 73+
With a bit of help from the refs (still dream of half tidy refs instead of Tierney) that could easily top 80
Cup starts January when we beat our Eastern cousins at their ground! |  |
| If you wake up breathing, thats a good start to your day and you'll make many thousands of people envious. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:25 - Oct 1 with 889 views | _ |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:04 - Oct 1 by Shaky |
That standard of proof required here is not the same as is needed in a criminal court.
Nevertheless for the majority of posters here you have clearly been convicted 'beyond any reasonable doubt'.
And that is not going to change no matter how many reacharounds Dim gives you. |
A criminal court no less.
Full.of.shit. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:26 - Oct 1 with 886 views | _ |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 17:17 - Oct 1 by Dewi1jack |
How is it pathetic?
Don't you think our lads are in with a shout of gaining promotion or winning the FA Cup then?
So much for lecturing others about having faith in them .
You obviously don't when we're only 10 games in and averaging 1.6 points a game, meaning we'll be around 73+
With a bit of help from the refs (still dream of half tidy refs instead of Tierney) that could easily top 80
Cup starts January when we beat our Eastern cousins at their ground! |
What are you on about?
The pathetic point had nothing to do with our football. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 19:42 - Oct 1 with 826 views | E20Jack |
Has there ever been a more embarrassing poster on here than Shaky? I’m including Darren in that too, and my answer is still probably ‘no’.
When he isn’t copying my views and slowly backtracking on his own and hoping nobody notices, he is backtracking on his own ludicrously fabricated rubbish, based on his deranged level of paranoia. He was telling everyone we were both getting paid to push a narrative not so long ago... now he’s dropped that and saying it’s for personal gratification. Who can forget the laughable ‘memo’ thread, that’s now apparently been downgraded to whatsapp.
On that note, “sad women whispering on whatsapp” in response to him being outed as doing just that in his paranoid rants at half the forum. He has the self awareness and level of perception of a confused pond newt.
Utterly tragic excuse for a poster, and hope it is a different story in his private life but have serious, serious doubts. Based on the evidence that is a slam dunk case too. [Post edited 1 Oct 2018 20:03]
|  |
| |
| (No subject) (n/t) on 19:47 - Oct 1 with 819 views | ohsusannah |
|  | | |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:06 - Oct 1 with 766 views | Darran |
I’ve just had a DM on Twitter off someone I’ve never met telling me Huw Jenkins always knows the team the night before a game.
I wonder if that’s where T2C gets his info from?
Mmmmmmmm!!! | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:13 - Oct 1 with 762 views | ohsusannah |
If true ,that is disturbing .
Surely our manager should not be beholden to inform the Chairman of the team. What is the purpose of that as the chairman shouldn't have any say in the selection of the team | | | |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:32 - Oct 1 with 739 views | ItchySphincter |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 10:27 - Oct 1 by Darran |
Could it be possible that someoneone inside the dressing room,any dressing room could be leaking information to an outsider? Yes or no? |
He doesn't do 'yes or no'. It won't be long before he's writing several paragraphs detailing about how you're frustrated and melting down, hurling puerile observations about your character, when a simple yes or no will suffice.
I don't know why you bother Dar?
It's one of the reasons this forum is dying on it's arse.... and before you say it, I know Chris is abrasive but at least he seems passionate about he club, right or wrong, and it does stimulate debate. All this other character is interested in is always being right - I've yet to see any evidence of interest in the club. |  |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:34 - Oct 1 with 736 views | Darran |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:32 - Oct 1 by ItchySphincter |
He doesn't do 'yes or no'. It won't be long before he's writing several paragraphs detailing about how you're frustrated and melting down, hurling puerile observations about your character, when a simple yes or no will suffice.
I don't know why you bother Dar?
It's one of the reasons this forum is dying on it's arse.... and before you say it, I know Chris is abrasive but at least he seems passionate about he club, right or wrong, and it does stimulate debate. All this other character is interested in is always being right - I've yet to see any evidence of interest in the club. |
Superb post and so true. A troll of the highest order. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:02 - Oct 1 with 687 views | E20Jack |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:32 - Oct 1 by ItchySphincter |
He doesn't do 'yes or no'. It won't be long before he's writing several paragraphs detailing about how you're frustrated and melting down, hurling puerile observations about your character, when a simple yes or no will suffice.
I don't know why you bother Dar?
It's one of the reasons this forum is dying on it's arse.... and before you say it, I know Chris is abrasive but at least he seems passionate about he club, right or wrong, and it does stimulate debate. All this other character is interested in is always being right - I've yet to see any evidence of interest in the club. |
Oh wibble.
You spend your existence on here trying to be profound only for it to fall flat on its face. You then take that frustration out on posters you deem are offering genuine insight. You will never be a good poster and have barely mustered two decent posts in your history. You are consigned to the background with a pointy stick poking it at anyone that frustrates you, along with the likes of Jacksfullaces and the rest of the trolling brigade.
And yes you are correct about what I will say because we both know damn well it’s true. You feel like pre-empting the truth protects it from being said. Not on your nelly, kid.
Passion for the club? You wouldn’t know passion for this club if it bit you on your face. You are too busy criticising it while fans like myself are defending it from the likes of you. You are a poorly constructed internet persona that lacks any sort of intellectual capacity to even construct a point or debate a topic.
That is what infuriates you and leads you to continually make these posts while stating how bored you are or how nobody should reply - it’s deliciously ironic and as transparent as your support for my club, or lack of it.
Do us a favour and stop obsessing about me will you? It’s awfully boring. [Post edited 1 Oct 2018 22:15]
| |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:04 - Oct 1 with 685 views | E20Jack |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 21:34 - Oct 1 by Darran |
Superb post and so true. A troll of the highest order. |
Yes defending the club is trolling.
I’m sure we all agree.
You don’t even know what it is. It is a meaningless blurb you utter when you are panicked. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:10 - Oct 1 with 672 views | E20Jack |
Am I able to up-vote myself?
After reading that reply back it genuinely is stunningly astute. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:15 - Oct 1 with 658 views | ItchySphincter |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:02 - Oct 1 by E20Jack |
Oh wibble.
You spend your existence on here trying to be profound only for it to fall flat on its face. You then take that frustration out on posters you deem are offering genuine insight. You will never be a good poster and have barely mustered two decent posts in your history. You are consigned to the background with a pointy stick poking it at anyone that frustrates you, along with the likes of Jacksfullaces and the rest of the trolling brigade.
And yes you are correct about what I will say because we both know damn well it’s true. You feel like pre-empting the truth protects it from being said. Not on your nelly, kid.
Passion for the club? You wouldn’t know passion for this club if it bit you on your face. You are too busy criticising it while fans like myself are defending it from the likes of you. You are a poorly constructed internet persona that lacks any sort of intellectual capacity to even construct a point or debate a topic.
That is what infuriates you and leads you to continually make these posts while stating how bored you are or how nobody should reply - it’s deliciously ironic and as transparent as your support for my club, or lack of it.
Do us a favour and stop obsessing about me will you? It’s awfully boring. [Post edited 1 Oct 2018 22:15]
|
Oh wibble.
It seems I continue to get under your skin. You'll never learn.
Schooled. © | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:20 - Oct 1 with 654 views | E20Jack |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:15 - Oct 1 by ItchySphincter |
Oh wibble.
It seems I continue to get under your skin. You'll never learn.
Schooled. © |
By replying to you? Not difficult, I will always reply to your inane rubbish.
But I am glad you admitted you are trolling again.
If there was ever a post to confirm everything I just typed in that wonderful post I gave you - you just did it.
QED | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:25 - Oct 1 with 638 views | ItchySphincter |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:20 - Oct 1 by E20Jack |
By replying to you? Not difficult, I will always reply to your inane rubbish.
But I am glad you admitted you are trolling again.
If there was ever a post to confirm everything I just typed in that wonderful post I gave you - you just did it.
QED |
I disagree. | |
| |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:27 - Oct 1 with 634 views | E20Jack |
| If Baker Richardson starts let's get behind the boy on 22:25 - Oct 1 by ItchySphincter |
I disagree. |
You would, you often disagree with perfect sense. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
