| Sir Philip Green 16:06 - Oct 25 with 5157 views | Thrasher6 |
Might as well start it....slimy piece of sh@t |  |
| |  |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:09 - Oct 26 with 879 views | Highjack |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:05 - Oct 26 by Dr_Winston |
For me it would depend very much on the nature of the offence and the wishes of the victim, who tend to get overlooked in all of this. I don't see it as a black and white issue. |
Well there have been allegations of racism so it probably is partly a black and white issue. |  |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:34 - Oct 26 with 861 views | Pegojack |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:05 - Oct 26 by Dr_Winston |
For me it would depend very much on the nature of the offence and the wishes of the victim, who tend to get overlooked in all of this. I don't see it as a black and white issue. |
Can't say I agree with you, Doc. I don't think it has anything to do with the wishes of the victim, because then you are saying you don't care about future victims, who surely have the right to expect the law to protect them from the perpetrator? |  | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:39 - Oct 26 with 859 views | Catullus |
If green is guitly then prison and stripped of his honour. Now Hain, he has used priviliged information and abused his position to get a bit of publicity. He's not done it out of concern for the victims but purely for self interest in my opinion. He should be stripped of his honour too and dumpd from the Lords, he should be the first of many.
Green is as odious as they come but Hain isn't far behind. |  |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 18:41 - Oct 26 with 836 views | waynekerr55 |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:39 - Oct 26 by Catullus |
If green is guitly then prison and stripped of his honour. Now Hain, he has used priviliged information and abused his position to get a bit of publicity. He's not done it out of concern for the victims but purely for self interest in my opinion. He should be stripped of his honour too and dumpd from the Lords, he should be the first of many.
Green is as odious as they come but Hain isn't far behind. |
Well said. Is he still dining out on freebies at the liberty or has he fúcked off 40 miles away to legoland? |  |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:28 - Oct 26 with 823 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 17:39 - Oct 26 by Catullus |
If green is guitly then prison and stripped of his honour. Now Hain, he has used priviliged information and abused his position to get a bit of publicity. He's not done it out of concern for the victims but purely for self interest in my opinion. He should be stripped of his honour too and dumpd from the Lords, he should be the first of many.
Green is as odious as they come but Hain isn't far behind. |
You do realise that Hain is a paid consultant to Gordon Dadds, the legal firm acting for The Telegraph in this injunction case, do you? |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:38 - Oct 26 with 810 views | waynekerr55 |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:28 - Oct 26 by Lohengrin |
You do realise that Hain is a paid consultant to Gordon Dadds, the legal firm acting for The Telegraph in this injunction case, do you? |
The plot thickens... | |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:45 - Oct 26 with 802 views | bluey_the_blue |
Oh sure, Loh says it ages after I say it and it's relevant :( | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:52 - Oct 26 with 797 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:45 - Oct 26 by bluey_the_blue |
Oh sure, Loh says it ages after I say it and it's relevant :( |
Sorry, mucka’. Hadn’t read the thread, I just got in from work and skipped to page three.
Still, a valid point always stands repeating.  | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Sir Philip Green on 19:59 - Oct 26 with 786 views | bluey_the_blue |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:52 - Oct 26 by Lohengrin |
Sorry, mucka’. Hadn’t read the thread, I just got in from work and skipped to page three.
Still, a valid point always stands repeating. |
I was only teasing.
It's a point that definitely bears repeating. | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:01 - Oct 26 with 783 views | exiledclaseboy |
Hain is about as self absorbed as it comes. I’ve had some dealings with him through the firm in question. This wasn’t an act of truth seeking benevolence on Hain’s part, it’s a purely financial arrangement and a blatant abuse of parliamentary privilege.
That said, anyone doubting Green’s guilt about the accusations is probably deluding themselves as well given the multiple pay offs and NDAs. It’ll all come out in the wash. [Post edited 26 Oct 2018 20:14]
|  |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:08 - Oct 26 with 766 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 19:59 - Oct 26 by bluey_the_blue |
I was only teasing.
It's a point that definitely bears repeating. |
Bluey, does Parliamentary privilege extend to unelected Life Peers? I was asked that earlier in work and I honestly have serious doubts that it does. Are you any the wiser? | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:13 - Oct 26 with 754 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:08 - Oct 26 by Lohengrin |
Bluey, does Parliamentary privilege extend to unelected Life Peers? I was asked that earlier in work and I honestly have serious doubts that it does. Are you any the wiser? |
It extends to all parliamentarians whether Commons or Lords. One thing Hain ain’t is stupid. | |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:15 - Oct 26 with 748 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:12 - Oct 26 by Lohengrin |
I don’t think anybody harbours any doubts about what sort of a nasty bit of work Green is Clase, to be honest, but oh! Lord to see Hain get jugged for contempt would be hilarious.  |
Nobody apart from Bluey in this here thread. | |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:17 - Oct 26 with 746 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:13 - Oct 26 by exiledclaseboy |
It extends to all parliamentarians whether Commons or Lords. One thing Hain ain’t is stupid. |
He did get caught out by his wife, mind. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:17 - Oct 26 with 743 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:15 - Oct 26 by exiledclaseboy |
Nobody apart from Bluey in this here thread. |
I like Bluey. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:20 - Oct 26 with 735 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:17 - Oct 26 by Lohengrin |
I like Bluey. |
He’ll always be a legend for his comical Ali performance on the election night thread last year. | |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:30 - Oct 26 with 726 views | Lohengrin |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:20 - Oct 26 by exiledclaseboy |
He’ll always be a legend for his comical Ali performance on the election night thread last year. |
I greatly admire the way he has more than once stood Jewry’s Ground in the face of a maelstrom of ‘progressive’ attacks. I don’t always agree with him, often times I don’t, but I do admire constancy and courage... even in a Cardiff scarf. | |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:51 - Oct 26 with 709 views | londonlisa2001 |
Hain is a self serving idiot. I think he was wrong to use parliamentary privilege while there was an interim injunction in place. His connections to the legal team advising the Telegraph make it even more ridiculous that he did this.
None of that impacts on what Green has allegedly done. Nor does it impact on the abuse of NDAs in these circumstances. People are put in impossible situations - sign this and take the money or I’ll destroy you. You’ll be out of work (a job that presumably they wanted to be in), references will be difficult, getting another job will be made as difficult as possible.
No one should be able to buy their way out of the proper repercussions of illegal behaviour. Whether the victim wants it or not. That’s the only way the blackmail to sign an NDA will stop. Because the victim is being abused twice over at the moment. Saying ‘if the victim wants it it’s fine’ will continue the cycle - it’s not exactly a free choice unless the victim has more options than normal. And people who abuse don’t choose those people to abuse in the first place. | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:53 - Oct 26 with 705 views | bluey_the_blue |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:15 - Oct 26 by exiledclaseboy |
Nobody apart from Bluey in this here thread. |
Wrong. I just pointed out the bleedingly obvious point that NDAs, settlements do not in themselves indicate guilt, which you know | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:54 - Oct 26 with 702 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:53 - Oct 26 by bluey_the_blue |
Wrong. I just pointed out the bleedingly obvious point that NDAs, settlements do not in themselves indicate guilt, which you know |
When you have a whole series of them I know which way I’d bet. | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:54 - Oct 26 with 701 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:53 - Oct 26 by bluey_the_blue |
Wrong. I just pointed out the bleedingly obvious point that NDAs, settlements do not in themselves indicate guilt, which you know |
The tend to indicate guilt more often than they’d indicate vindication. Especially when you’ve got a bucket load of them. [Post edited 26 Oct 2018 20:55]
| |
| |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:56 - Oct 26 with 694 views | bluey_the_blue |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:54 - Oct 26 by londonlisa2001 |
When you have a whole series of them I know which way I’d bet. |
I'd agree somewhat.
Until any of the allegations are proven though, that point is mute.
It still remains "innocent until proven guilty" last I checked. | | | |
| Sir Philip Green on 21:06 - Oct 26 with 684 views | exiledclaseboy |
| Sir Philip Green on 20:56 - Oct 26 by bluey_the_blue |
I'd agree somewhat.
Until any of the allegations are proven though, that point is mute.
It still remains "innocent until proven guilty" last I checked. |
Moot. Ffs, Bluey mun. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
