Forum | Any signs of the Trust actually by swancity

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

Any signs of the Trust actually 09:17 - Jan 17 with 894 views

swancity

making progress in terms of the legal action

They seem to be quieter than ever if that’s possible

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1

Any signs of the Trust actually on 09:49 - Jan 17 with 875 views

pikeypaul

Do not hold your breath.

Certain members have always been against giving Jenkins a hard time.

You only have to look back and see how people like Uxbridge fought tooth and nail
against action 2 years ago when after great expense to the trust and the barrister saying we had a very good case they still recommended no action.

The reason still has not come out but one day it will.

[Post edited 17 Jan 2019 9:50]

	OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§
Poll:	Where wil Judas be sitting when we play Millwall?

-2

Any signs of the Trust actually on 09:58 - Jan 17 with 854 views

swancity

Any signs of the Trust actually on 09:49 - Jan 17 by pikeypaul

[Post edited 17 Jan 2019 9:50]

This is not about simply giving someone a hard time.
It’s about fighting for what is yours. It’s about casting old friendships to one side as clearly lots of people have been taken for a ride. Uxbridge spent weeks writing essays on the subject advising against legal action bizarrely. Even now there seems a reluctance to take the initiative.

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-2

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:15 - Jan 17 with 742 views

pikeypaul

Any signs of the Trust actually on 09:58 - Jan 17 by swancity
This is not about simply giving someone a hard time. It’s about fighting for what is yours. It’s about casting old friendships to one side as clearly lots of people have been taken for a ride. Uxbridge spent weeks writing essays on the subject advising against legal action bizarrely. Even now there seems a reluctance to take the initiative.

Why do you think he fought tooth and nail for no action ?

If you scroll back to his posts at the time there is complete desperation in his pleas and reasons for no action.

Even now in hindsight when he has been shown to be a complete mug in believing all Jenkins' promises at the time he can not admit how wrong he got it ,intentially or otherwise .

[Post edited 17 Jan 2019 12:32]

	OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§
Poll:	Where wil Judas be sitting when we play Millwall?

-1

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:27 - Jan 17 with 728 views

swancity

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:15 - Jan 17 by pikeypaul
Why do you think he fought tooth and nail for no action ? If you scroll back to his posts at the time there is complete desperation in his pleas and reasons for no action. Even now in hindsight when he has been shown to be a complete mug in believing all Jenkins' promises at the time he can not admit how wrong he got it ,intentially or otherwise . [Post edited 17 Jan 2019 12:32]

I don’t know. I was curious at the time and still find it confusing and at odds with legal
advice they received

He certainly did not do what was required and that was to give a balanced view. He went overboard with ramblings to do his best to sway opinion away from the advice received it seems

Only an idiot would eat a turkey curry on Christmas day

-1

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:32 - Jan 17 with 716 views

LeonWasGod

I'm sure there was a thread on here the other day talking about the money that's being put aside for legal action

Any signs of the Trust actually on 13:51 - Jan 17 with 617 views

dobjack2

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:15 - Jan 17 by pikeypaul
Why do you think he fought tooth and nail for no action ? If you scroll back to his posts at the time there is complete desperation in his pleas and reasons for no action. Even now in hindsight when he has been shown to be a complete mug in believing all Jenkins' promises at the time he can not admit how wrong he got it ,intentially or otherwise . [Post edited 17 Jan 2019 12:32]

If the trust board at the time voted to recommend no action, even if it was against advice, then board members would probably be under a collective responsibility to follow the board decision whether they agreed with it or not otherwise they could resign.

Not saying this was the case but it is a possibility.

Any signs of the Trust actually on 20:16 - Jan 17 with 476 views

pikeypaul

Any signs of the Trust actually on 13:51 - Jan 17 by dobjack2
If the trust board at the time voted to recommend no action, even if it was against advice, then board members would probably be under a collective responsibility to follow the board decision whether they agreed with it or not otherwise they could resign. Not saying this was the case but it is a possibility.

It had nothing to do with him following other board members,it's to do with his constant and continuous posts against action at the time,if he was just following orders he would have kept his mouth shut and not defended Jenkins so vehemently.

Anyone that supported legal action and posted their reasons on here recieved a reply from him arguing against it,whatever the reason.
Some good and not so good reasons but everyone of the 100s of reasons posted by members he would object to and he always come to a no action verdict.
Just go back and have a look at all his pro Jenkins and board posts,it's very bizarre and now in hindsight quite shocking.

	OUT AFLI SUCK IT UP REMOANER LOSERS ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§ ðŸ‡¬ðŸ‡§
Poll:	Where wil Judas be sitting when we play Millwall?

Any signs of the Trust actually on 20:49 - Jan 17 with 442 views

Glyn1

Any signs of the Trust actually on 12:32 - Jan 17 by LeonWasGod
I'm sure there was a thread on here the other day talking about the money that's being put aside for legal action

£300,000.

Trust AGM by Highjack 14 Jan 2019 0:18
8.
NOTICES OF MOTION PROPOSED BY TRUST MEMBER ROGER BRACE.
1. Amendment to the Model Rules 2016 that any Member of the Trust shall be en
titled to view any Document of
the Trust on giving 14 days notice of that intention.
2. That Authority is given by the Members of the Trust for the continuance of the legal claims against Huw
Jenkins, Mrs. Louisa Morgan and others being the vendor share
holders in share transfers dated 21
st
July 2016 and
11th June 2017 together with such other parties as appropriate on the proviso that the Trust’s Legal advisers
confirm a reasonable prospect of success in the litigation and to incur professional fee costs
including value added
tax up to an initial amount of £300,000 and further to allocate sufficient funds from the Trust’s Reserves to meet
that expenditure.

https://www.swanstrust.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Swans-Trust-AGM-Agenda-Jan-2019.pdf

Poll:

Who should be our next manager? Please name them.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread