| Jenkins says more on 11:54 - Feb 9 with 1201 views | Oldjack |
| Jenkins says more on 07:51 - Feb 9 by Brynmill_Jack |
“So Karen, what was it that first attracted you to multi millionaire Huw Jenkins?” |
Why ,his massive conk  |  |
| Prosser the Tosser dwells on Phil's bum hole like a rusty old hemorrhoid ,fact
You Greedy Bastards Get Out Of OUR Club!
|
|  |
| Jenkins says more on 16:06 - Feb 9 with 1128 views | QJumpingJack |
re: sacking of Laudrup.
There is no way a decision should have come down to one board member.
If Jenkins is telling the truth that the Trust sacked Laudrup then there needs to be investigation into the governance and accountability of the board during this period.
Surely it was a majority vote? |  | | |
| Jenkins says more on 16:25 - Feb 9 with 1104 views | waynekerr55 |
| Jenkins says more on 16:06 - Feb 9 by QJumpingJack |
re: sacking of Laudrup.
There is no way a decision should have come down to one board member.
If Jenkins is telling the truth that the Trust sacked Laudrup then there needs to be investigation into the governance and accountability of the board during this period.
Surely it was a majority vote? |
If Jenkins is telling the truth then why did he sack him by email?
Whilst you're at it, ask David Moss why the club had to pay him off. Jenkins would try to tell everyone to jump on the Tawe and you'd be dry! |  |
| |
| Jenkins says more on 17:35 - Feb 9 with 1045 views | Smellyplumz |
Jenkins rot in hell you treacherous judas cum guzzler. |  |
|
""Although I cannot promise or predict the future, I can guarantee one thing - the current board of directors will always fight, as we have done over the last 12 years, to work together as one with the Supporters Trust to make 100% sure that Swansea City football club remains the number one priority in all our thoughts and in every decision we make." | | Poll: | Huw Jenkins |
| |
| Jenkins says more on 19:47 - Feb 9 with 968 views | Uxbridge |
| Jenkins says more on 16:06 - Feb 9 by QJumpingJack |
re: sacking of Laudrup.
There is no way a decision should have come down to one board member.
If Jenkins is telling the truth that the Trust sacked Laudrup then there needs to be investigation into the governance and accountability of the board during this period.
Surely it was a majority vote? |
He isn't. Not a chance. |  |
| |
| Jenkins says more on 19:58 - Feb 9 with 952 views | Gaz_M |
| Jenkins says more on 16:06 - Feb 9 by QJumpingJack |
re: sacking of Laudrup.
There is no way a decision should have come down to one board member.
If Jenkins is telling the truth that the Trust sacked Laudrup then there needs to be investigation into the governance and accountability of the board during this period.
Surely it was a majority vote? |
Have you read the article? Because you've completely misquoted him here like. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
