Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
For the pious anti gambling mob 14:20 - Mar 4 with 2301 viewsBarrySwan

I note that the 'You never see a poor bookie' adage has taken a bit of a knock this week with William Hills announcement of a £722m loss for 2018.

I will consider a conditional acceptance of an apology from the beeding hearts on here who were quite adamant that myself and others were just winning off other mug punters rather than gaining a certain degree of satisfaction of rinsing the bookies on a reasonably regular basis.
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:35 - Mar 4 with 2265 viewsrockinjk

So you think that’s because they’ve lost more to punters?

Mate, seriously?

It’s far more likely to do with lots of other factors e.g. new regulations, reducing revenue and going for growth

Stop kidding yourself, gambling IS a mugs game
6
For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:48 - Mar 4 with 2248 viewsLeonWasGod

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:35 - Mar 4 by rockinjk

So you think that’s because they’ve lost more to punters?

Mate, seriously?

It’s far more likely to do with lots of other factors e.g. new regulations, reducing revenue and going for growth

Stop kidding yourself, gambling IS a mugs game


Looks that way - 10 second google:

"The bare figures announced for last year looked grim, with William Hill posting a statutory loss of £722 million, but that was down to a major write down of their betting shop business of nearly £883m prompted by the government's decision to reduce FOBT stakes to £2 and had been flagged up last year.

Adjusted operating profit was down by three per cent to £266.8m, in line with expectations, the bookmaker said, while revenue rose two per cent to £1.62 billion."
1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:53 - Mar 4 with 2241 viewsrockinjk

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:48 - Mar 4 by LeonWasGod

Looks that way - 10 second google:

"The bare figures announced for last year looked grim, with William Hill posting a statutory loss of £722 million, but that was down to a major write down of their betting shop business of nearly £883m prompted by the government's decision to reduce FOBT stakes to £2 and had been flagged up last year.

Adjusted operating profit was down by three per cent to £266.8m, in line with expectations, the bookmaker said, while revenue rose two per cent to £1.62 billion."


Barry?
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:55 - Mar 4 with 2235 viewsicecoldjack

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:35 - Mar 4 by rockinjk

So you think that’s because they’ve lost more to punters?

Mate, seriously?

It’s far more likely to do with lots of other factors e.g. new regulations, reducing revenue and going for growth

Stop kidding yourself, gambling IS a mugs game


Exactly.

Mugs game.
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 15:08 - Mar 4 with 2211 viewsJACKMANANDBOY

So.......one off costs as a result of regulatory changes aimed at reducing the very harmful effects of FOBTs.

Besian Idrizaj Forever a Jack
Poll: When will Duff Revert to 4 at the Back

0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 15:11 - Mar 4 with 2210 viewsLeonWasGod

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:53 - Mar 4 by rockinjk

Barry?


Probably down the bookies!
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 16:26 - Mar 4 with 2128 viewsfelixstowe_jack

Seems just an accounting dodge . Post a one downgrading of assets to show a loss of £780 million. This means that they can offset that loss against the next 4 years profits of £200 million a year, total £800 million saving themselves around £20 million in corporation tax for 4 years.

Poll: Sholud Wales rollout vaccination at full speed.

0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 18:46 - Mar 4 with 2053 viewstaffpunk

As we've discussed before on here, once the 2 pound max spin on the machines comes in, at least a third, maybe as many as half will definitely close.

Second Time Around Record Shop-Tonypandy, RCT-Open Friday and Saturday. Valley Leaflets-Reliable Leaflet Distribution throughout South Wales.

0
Login to get fewer ads

For the pious anti gambling mob on 19:58 - Mar 4 with 2008 viewsrockinjk

For the pious anti gambling mob on 16:26 - Mar 4 by felixstowe_jack

Seems just an accounting dodge . Post a one downgrading of assets to show a loss of £780 million. This means that they can offset that loss against the next 4 years profits of £200 million a year, total £800 million saving themselves around £20 million in corporation tax for 4 years.


Yep, poor old Bazzer thought it was the punter beating the bookie

..... yeah
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 20:21 - Mar 4 with 1981 viewsdickythorpe

The profit and loss on my sky bet shows I made 2k profit last year.

Now if I'm making money........
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 20:22 - Mar 4 with 1976 viewsexiledclaseboy

This went well for the OP. Massive fail.

Poll: Tory leader

0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 20:26 - Mar 4 with 1972 viewsDyfnant

For the pious anti gambling mob on 18:46 - Mar 4 by taffpunk

As we've discussed before on here, once the 2 pound max spin on the machines comes in, at least a third, maybe as many as half will definitely close.


Those machines & fruities should only be available in Casinos, regardless of potential job losses.

Poll: How much will SCFC spend on transfer fees this summer

1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 20:29 - Mar 4 with 1964 viewslondonlisa2001

For the pious anti gambling mob on 16:26 - Mar 4 by felixstowe_jack

Seems just an accounting dodge . Post a one downgrading of assets to show a loss of £780 million. This means that they can offset that loss against the next 4 years profits of £200 million a year, total £800 million saving themselves around £20 million in corporation tax for 4 years.


Yeah, that’s not how it works.
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 21:59 - Mar 4 with 1887 viewsPacemaker

A couple of months ago as part of my job I was given a tour of a very high end London casino in Mayfair and was given an explanation of how they fought and won a legal claim for failing to pay out to a punter. The subsequent ruling effectively changed the legal definition of theft.

The one thing that stuck in my head was how they knew the punter was cheating......”because we always win.”

Gambling should be seen as a form of entertainment, if you want to spend your hard earned on giving yourself a thrill on the basis that you may win occasionally then why not. But it should be treated as just that a form of entertainment like the cinema, theatre or going to watch the Swans.

Life is an adventure or nothing at all.

3
For the pious anti gambling mob on 22:15 - Mar 4 with 1869 viewslifelong

For the pious anti gambling mob on 21:59 - Mar 4 by Pacemaker

A couple of months ago as part of my job I was given a tour of a very high end London casino in Mayfair and was given an explanation of how they fought and won a legal claim for failing to pay out to a punter. The subsequent ruling effectively changed the legal definition of theft.

The one thing that stuck in my head was how they knew the punter was cheating......”because we always win.”

Gambling should be seen as a form of entertainment, if you want to spend your hard earned on giving yourself a thrill on the basis that you may win occasionally then why not. But it should be treated as just that a form of entertainment like the cinema, theatre or going to watch the Swans.


I agree.

I enjoy a game of poker and have been playing, occasionally, online for quite a few years. I have kept a record of how much spent and how much won and have done ok over quite a long period of time. I look at it as a source of enjoyment but it is easy to see how one with poor discipline could get addicted.
1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 22:22 - Mar 4 with 1853 viewsrockinjk

For the pious anti gambling mob on 21:59 - Mar 4 by Pacemaker

A couple of months ago as part of my job I was given a tour of a very high end London casino in Mayfair and was given an explanation of how they fought and won a legal claim for failing to pay out to a punter. The subsequent ruling effectively changed the legal definition of theft.

The one thing that stuck in my head was how they knew the punter was cheating......”because we always win.”

Gambling should be seen as a form of entertainment, if you want to spend your hard earned on giving yourself a thrill on the basis that you may win occasionally then why not. But it should be treated as just that a form of entertainment like the cinema, theatre or going to watch the Swans.


Very good post.

I’m not into banning it and I’ve had a flutter once in a blue moon

However the plethora of adverts and wide spread gambling culture is a massive issue
2
For the pious anti gambling mob on 09:24 - Mar 5 with 1716 viewsBarrySwan

I see


So we can put a £722m loss in 2018 down to the ( welcome) introduction of a £2 limit on FOBTs in April 2019?
[Post edited 5 Mar 2019 9:24]
1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 09:26 - Mar 5 with 1708 viewsLeonWasGod

For the pious anti gambling mob on 09:24 - Mar 5 by BarrySwan

I see


So we can put a £722m loss in 2018 down to the ( welcome) introduction of a £2 limit on FOBTs in April 2019?
[Post edited 5 Mar 2019 9:24]


Yes.
1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 09:29 - Mar 5 with 1703 viewsLeonWasGod

For the pious anti gambling mob on 21:59 - Mar 4 by Pacemaker

A couple of months ago as part of my job I was given a tour of a very high end London casino in Mayfair and was given an explanation of how they fought and won a legal claim for failing to pay out to a punter. The subsequent ruling effectively changed the legal definition of theft.

The one thing that stuck in my head was how they knew the punter was cheating......”because we always win.”

Gambling should be seen as a form of entertainment, if you want to spend your hard earned on giving yourself a thrill on the basis that you may win occasionally then why not. But it should be treated as just that a form of entertainment like the cinema, theatre or going to watch the Swans.


Good post. It's not my thing really apart from the occasional race day, but I don't see the problem with gambling as long as it's affordable and doesn't start to control people (e.g. either through addition or through illegal activities to try and scam the bookies - e.g. match fixing).
1
For the pious anti gambling mob on 12:19 - Mar 5 with 1644 viewsEbo

For the pious anti gambling mob on 20:22 - Mar 4 by exiledclaseboy

This went well for the OP. Massive fail.


I "bet" he won't reply either Andrew ;)

Thank you, goodnight and bollocks
Poll: What couldn't you live without?

0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 13:17 - Mar 5 with 1615 viewsYossarian

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:55 - Mar 4 by icecoldjack

Exactly.

Mugs game.


‘The pious anti-gambling mob’.....seriously there are some morons on this site.

"Yossarian- the very sight of the name made him shudder.There were so many esses in it. It just had to be subversive" (Catch 22)

0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:56 - Mar 5 with 1575 viewsBarrySwan

For the pious anti gambling mob on 12:19 - Mar 5 by Ebo

I "bet" he won't reply either Andrew ;)


With your usual superb sense of perception, observation and timing you're two posts too late I'm afraid.
0
For the pious anti gambling mob on 15:00 - Mar 5 with 1570 viewsEbo

For the pious anti gambling mob on 14:56 - Mar 5 by BarrySwan

With your usual superb sense of perception, observation and timing you're two posts too late I'm afraid.


Thought I'd gamble that's all.

Thank you, goodnight and bollocks
Poll: What couldn't you live without?

0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024