Bradford 12:27 - Aug 2 with 1289 views | GeoffThom | Get 2.5m from the deal apparently So we will get 14.5m if it's 17m | | | | |
Bradford on 12:36 - Aug 2 with 1247 views | sg1912 | I don’t know if that’s true, I’m sure we bought them out of the sell on clause a few years ago. | | | |
Bradford on 12:39 - Aug 2 with 1221 views | andypitt56 |
Bradford on 12:36 - Aug 2 by sg1912 | I don’t know if that’s true, I’m sure we bought them out of the sell on clause a few years ago. |
I thought that as well, however i actually think it was James and Hull that we bought out the sell on clause. | | | |
Bradford on 12:42 - Aug 2 with 1208 views | jasper_T |
Bradford on 12:39 - Aug 2 by andypitt56 | I thought that as well, however i actually think it was James and Hull that we bought out the sell on clause. |
There was never a sell-on clause with Hull. The tribunal awarded a flat fee and appearance clauses, which were paid. They were entitled to 2 of the 5% solidarity payment for training him but that was it. | | | |
Bradford on 13:02 - Aug 2 with 1073 views | jasper_T | At least there won't be an extra 5% training compensation fee paid because we're past the end of the season of his 23rd birthday, which was at the start of June so technically (I think) falls under last season. End of July tends to be the standard start/end point. | | | |
| |