By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
For God's sake bluey, she wasn't interrupting him, she was trying to get him to stop talking. They were supposed to have a certain amount of time to answer questions but he just kept talking over her and JC.
Andrew Neil is a good call. He really would shut him up.
He'd also have skewered Corbyn over non answer re Brexit. May have asked him why he pronounced it "Ep-schtine".
The faux outrage is astounding. Twitter handle clearly showed it was Tories, page clearly showed it was Tories.
Corbyn's particular pronounciation of Epstein has been noted.
And to mislead the UK. This is the government... The British Government are trying to mislead the public and the propoganda peddling is up there! Yet, you and much of the media are lapping it up... Its abject political political corruption.
Of course it would be astounding for you and if it had to explained to you then you'd never ever understand. It is what you are, predicable.
For God's sake bluey, she wasn't interrupting him, she was trying to get him to stop talking. They were supposed to have a certain amount of time to answer questions but he just kept talking over her and JC.
Andrew Neil is a good call. He really would shut him up.
I think such debates involving BJ needs a man because he has next to no respect for women. Andrew Neill should be the host every time.
And to mislead the UK. This is the government... The British Government are trying to mislead the public and the propoganda peddling is up there! Yet, you and much of the media are lapping it up... Its abject political political corruption.
Of course it would be astounding for you and if it had to explained to you then you'd never ever understand. It is what you are, predicable.
And again, twitter handle clearly showed it was Tory HQ as did the logo on the page.
You'd have to be really fvcking stupid to get confused by that.
Nice to see you failed to condemn Labour doing similar...
EDIT:
Like it or not, there's dishonesty and spin everywhere.
BBC news talk to NHS nurse, Danielle who blasts government? Cool, except her full name was Danielle Tiplady, labour activist who writes for Morning Star, stood to become PPC for Labour...
Labour pull ad where they used an actor pretending to be nurse.
These things happen everywhere.
Just let it go, I say, it'll at least make the election more interesting.
And again, twitter handle clearly showed it was Tory HQ as did the logo on the page.
You'd have to be really fvcking stupid to get confused by that.
Nice to see you failed to condemn Labour doing similar...
EDIT:
Like it or not, there's dishonesty and spin everywhere.
BBC news talk to NHS nurse, Danielle who blasts government? Cool, except her full name was Danielle Tiplady, labour activist who writes for Morning Star, stood to become PPC for Labour...
Labour pull ad where they used an actor pretending to be nurse.
These things happen everywhere.
Just let it go, I say, it'll at least make the election more interesting.
[Post edited 20 Nov 2019 11:17]
And again you have nothing, nada! Oh apart from whataboutary.
British Government trying to mislead the British Public. Peddling propaganda. Read it again!
The only thing i'm confused about it trying to figure out is why the British Government are purposely misleading, en masse the British public? Why have they not released the Russian Report? Why have YOU fallen for it?
EDIT: Bluey...right there, thats the main problem YOU WANT TO LET IT GO! We shouldn't and they should be held accountable. Letting shite like this go is one of, if not, the main reason as to why we find ourselves where we are.
And again you have nothing, nada! Oh apart from whataboutary.
British Government trying to mislead the British Public. Peddling propaganda. Read it again!
The only thing i'm confused about it trying to figure out is why the British Government are purposely misleading, en masse the British public? Why have they not released the Russian Report? Why have YOU fallen for it?
EDIT: Bluey...right there, thats the main problem YOU WANT TO LET IT GO! We shouldn't and they should be held accountable. Letting shite like this go is one of, if not, the main reason as to why we find ourselves where we are.
[Post edited 20 Nov 2019 11:23]
Pointing out everyone does similar is hardly "whataboutery". That implies excuses are being made.
It's a simple fact every party lies - like Corbyn's claim antisemitism cases have all been dealt with, for example. It's amusing that so many see to criticise Tories only... funny that.
Want to hold people accountable? Sure. Then hold everyone accountable rather than being selective...
Pointing out everyone does similar is hardly "whataboutery". That implies excuses are being made.
It's a simple fact every party lies - like Corbyn's claim antisemitism cases have all been dealt with, for example. It's amusing that so many see to criticise Tories only... funny that.
Want to hold people accountable? Sure. Then hold everyone accountable rather than being selective...
You still don't get it do you. The fact checking fake UK twitter attempt shows a contempt and disdain for the truth and it was run by the Tories, who's leader is a proven liar with a questionable character. This on the back of that Russian report blocking...Further, It was misleading and right out of the Trumpian/Putin playbook. It wasn't a fact check UK it was pretending to fact check, and it didn't do that, but rather a platform for more misinformation, lies and, well behaviour that should be firmly booted out of British Politics.
At the end thought both were very, very poor, but Corbyn did a bit better than Johnson. The format was dreadful, no real points of substance being able to break through the infantile posturing.
Johnson’s comment about the royal family being beyond reproach was disgraceful given the events of the last few days.
The Conservative press account, already attempting to mislead by the use of the letters CCHQ to be honest, pulled a disingenuous, pathetic stunt for which they should be utterly condemned.
What a dreadful state of affairs that one of these will be PM for the next 5 years. Can only hope that we end up with a Parliament so deadlocked that neither of them can do anything whatsoever.
You still don't get it do you. The fact checking fake UK twitter attempt shows a contempt and disdain for the truth and it was run by the Tories, who's leader is a proven liar with a questionable character. This on the back of that Russian report blocking...Further, It was misleading and right out of the Trumpian/Putin playbook. It wasn't a fact check UK it was pretending to fact check, and it didn't do that, but rather a platform for more misinformation, lies and, well behaviour that should be firmly booted out of British Politics.
Distain for truth? Exposing Corbyns lies more like.
Can't wait for you to campaign for politics to be scrapped totally...
At the end thought both were very, very poor, but Corbyn did a bit better than Johnson. The format was dreadful, no real points of substance being able to break through the infantile posturing.
Johnson’s comment about the royal family being beyond reproach was disgraceful given the events of the last few days.
The Conservative press account, already attempting to mislead by the use of the letters CCHQ to be honest, pulled a disingenuous, pathetic stunt for which they should be utterly condemned.
What a dreadful state of affairs that one of these will be PM for the next 5 years. Can only hope that we end up with a Parliament so deadlocked that neither of them can do anything whatsoever.
Didn't see the Royal family comment, but was it about the institution of the royal family as a concept or Andrew specifically?
At the end thought both were very, very poor, but Corbyn did a bit better than Johnson. The format was dreadful, no real points of substance being able to break through the infantile posturing.
Johnson’s comment about the royal family being beyond reproach was disgraceful given the events of the last few days.
The Conservative press account, already attempting to mislead by the use of the letters CCHQ to be honest, pulled a disingenuous, pathetic stunt for which they should be utterly condemned.
What a dreadful state of affairs that one of these will be PM for the next 5 years. Can only hope that we end up with a Parliament so deadlocked that neither of them can do anything whatsoever.
Look on the bright side Lisa if Corbyn wins he gets to implement more caring sharing policies, if Johnson wins then the UK breaks up and Wales will be in the news and on the agenda after Scotland and N.Ireland do their thing, if its a totally deadlocked Parliament then Plaid will have a bigger voice than they otherwise would have [assuming they get any seats] and a second EU referendum will be on the cards but with the deal known this time up against remain.
Look on the bright side Lisa if Corbyn wins he gets to implement more caring sharing policies, if Johnson wins then the UK breaks up and Wales will be in the news and on the agenda after Scotland and N.Ireland do their thing, if its a totally deadlocked Parliament then Plaid will have a bigger voice than they otherwise would have [assuming they get any seats] and a second EU referendum will be on the cards but with the deal known this time up against remain.
It's more the point that he went with the German-Jewish pronounciation, making it more exaggerated the second time rather than the Americanised Ep-steen.
It's as if he wanted everyone to be firmly aware of the fact that Epstein was a monster, but particularly a Jewish monster.
It's more the point that he went with the German-Jewish pronounciation, making it more exaggerated the second time rather than the Americanised Ep-steen.
It's as if he wanted everyone to be firmly aware of the fact that Epstein was a monster, but particularly a Jewish monster.
That’s a bit of a jump. It’s more likely he’s just pronouncing his name wrong because he’s a bit of a fool.
The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
Once you get to the point of accepting that Johnson could have taken a shit in the middle of the studio during last night’s debate and Bluey would have still claimed a resounding victory for the PM and said either:
A - it was Corbyn who made Johnson shit in the studio or B - it was the presenter’s fault cos she interrupted Johnson so much he shit himself or C - Corbyn or someone he met once shit in a synagogue or D - any criticism of shitting in the studio is clearly an anti semitic slur.
It's more the point that he went with the German-Jewish pronounciation, making it more exaggerated the second time rather than the Americanised Ep-steen.
It's as if he wanted everyone to be firmly aware of the fact that Epstein was a monster, but particularly a Jewish monster.
You didn’t even hear it.
The argument is nonsensical though.
Saying his name using the American pronunciation also makes it obvious he’s Jewish as it’s a Jewish name. However it’s pronounced. Him being Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the point that he’s a paedophile monster.
Saying his name using the American pronunciation also makes it obvious he’s Jewish as it’s a Jewish name. However it’s pronounced. Him being Jewish is utterly irrelevant to the point that he’s a paedophile monster.
I saw the clip online, Lisa.
It's hardly nonsensical.
As I said, he's a monster on that I agree with you. You however don't even seem at all curious as to why Corbyn chose to use the German - Jewish pronounciation rather then the American pronounciation that, well, everyone uses. I doubt Corbyn knows much Yiddish tbh.
It's like when Labourites would say "Port-eee-o" rather than "Port-ill-o". I don't exactly think they were paying respect to his Spanish heritage, do you?
As I said, he's a monster on that I agree with you. You however don't even seem at all curious as to why Corbyn chose to use the German - Jewish pronounciation rather then the American pronounciation that, well, everyone uses. I doubt Corbyn knows much Yiddish tbh.
It's like when Labourites would say "Port-eee-o" rather than "Port-ill-o". I don't exactly think they were paying respect to his Spanish heritage, do you?
You literally said 5 minutes ago you didn’t see Johnson talking about the Royals. And now you say you saw Corbyn. And it was the same bloody answer Bluey. The same 1 minute of the interview.
Epstein, as you are well aware, can be pronounced ‘steen’ (more usual in the US) or ‘stine’ - more usual in the UK.
Given Corbyn has represented a North London seat for donkey’s years, I suspect he knows quite a bit of Yiddish as it happens. And he may have been trying to pronounce it ‘correctly’ to emphasise is connection with the Jewish community after all the problems (ironically).
As you are aware, I have said on countless occasions I think the left has a problem with antisemitism. I don’t believe Corbyn himself to be anti Semitic, but ineffectual and really pretty stupid. He doesn’t notice anti semitism and doesn’t deal with it properly.
But do I think he was being anti Semitic last night? No. In fact, it’s farcical to suggest he was.
It’s like saying Johnson always calling Angela Merkel ‘Angayla’ is making some sort of statement. It’s ridiculous.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
