| What have the Yanks actually done if anything 22:53 - Dec 30 with 2883 views | builthjack |
To better the club. Since they arrived in July 2016. [Post edited 30 Dec 2019 23:28]
|  |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |  |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 22:56 - Dec 30 with 1969 views | 34dfgdf54 |
See Lisa’s post in the Birch Programme Note thread. Sums it up brilliantly.
They have been a complete and utter disaster and it simply won’t be possible to move forward as a club until they are gone. |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 22:56 - Dec 30 with 1959 views | Swanjaxs |
Lowered the Policing bill... |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 22:57 - Dec 30 with 1963 views | builthjack |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 22:56 - Dec 30 by 34dfgdf54 |
See Lisa’s post in the Birch Programme Note thread. Sums it up brilliantly.
They have been a complete and utter disaster and it simply won’t be possible to move forward as a club until they are gone. |
I agree. A total fck up from the start. | |
| Swansea Indepenent Poster Of The Year 2021. Dr P / Mart66 / Roathie / Parlay / E20/ Duffle was 2nd, but he is deluded and thinks in his little twisted brain that he won. Poor sod. We let him win this year, as he has cried for a whole year. His 14 usernames, bless his cotton socks.
|
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:08 - Dec 30 with 1922 views | QJumpingJack |
they opened a club shop in the city centre and then closed it. |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 with 1889 views | Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:26 - Dec 30 with 1887 views | Cooperman |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
 |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:32 - Dec 30 with 1869 views | Swanjaxs |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
Sorry mate but had to stop reading your post at this point...
No offence intended brother 👠| |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:35 - Dec 30 with 1855 views | thornabyswan |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
 | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:57 - Dec 30 with 1822 views | Fireboy2 |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
Fvck me sideways  |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 00:20 - Dec 31 with 1795 views | swan65split |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:57 - Dec 30 by Fireboy2 |
Fvck me sideways |
Sounds like a Cooper move! |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 00:27 - Dec 31 with 1782 views | Darran |
They’ve done nothing the old board couldn’t have done.
They might have verbally promised the earth to Dineen and Jenkins when they were negotiating the deal behind everyone else’s backs but they certainly haven’t followed through with it.
There’s been no investment whatsoever and it will be getting worse that’s for sure. |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 00:52 - Dec 31 with 1760 views | theloneranger |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
"Rescued us from the effects of Monk" ??? ...
And brought in our saviour ... Bob fvcking Bradley!!
|  |
| Everyday above ground ... Is a good day! 😎 |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 05:55 - Dec 31 with 1694 views | NotLoyal |
180 million...
where 👀 |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 06:45 - Dec 31 with 1683 views | TimTtam |
We have an app |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 06:47 - Dec 31 with 1682 views | TimTtam |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
So I take it winning a trophy, and making it past the group stages of the Europa League is the definition of "failures"? | |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 06:51 - Dec 31 with 1676 views | Thornburyswan |
Nothing but then again they made an investment in the belief of a better return over time they have no responsibility to any betterment of the club, they were/are not fans. | | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 07:33 - Dec 31 with 1634 views | bennytheblue |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 05:55 - Dec 31 by NotLoyal |
180 million...
where 👀 |
This is where it’s gone according to the fake jack roathie on Annis Site:
It doesn't matter who is asking it really, the answer remains the same.
Parachute payments are there to cover a drop in revenue upon relegation. We went from income around the 105m mark to about 18m. Parachute payments would bump that up to around 60m leaving a 45m per year black hole.
James and McBurnie were sold but sales are amortised, meaning thy payments are spread across a period of time, meaning you dont get 35m up front. So far we have probably had a third of both fees - 12m lets say. Leaving a 33m black hole. This was reduced further by getting rid of salaries etc for the likes of Fer, J Ayew, Narsingh, Bony and Olsson which all in all (including some others) we expected trimmed another 24m of the salary bill. We also added about 1m worth of players in transfer fees, signing on fees and agents fees leaving a 10m loss roughly for the year. Almost certainly some form of loss and no profit at all.
Parachute payments are reduced by around 8m in the second season, yet we carry the costs over from the season before. Its likely we will need to sell another 1 or 2 before being able to break even (that's with the parachute payments).
Without the parachute payments we will need to restructure further, making cuts to the academy status etc to enable us to live self sufficiently.
Anyone who thinks there is any money to take is living in cloud cuckoo land. To be blunt. Hope that answers your question. :thumbup:
There is nothing he doesn’t know ya know🤷ðŸ¼â€â™‚ï¸ |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 07:36 - Dec 31 with 1626 views | Swanjaxs |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 07:33 - Dec 31 by bennytheblue |
This is where it’s gone according to the fake jack roathie on Annis Site:
It doesn't matter who is asking it really, the answer remains the same.
Parachute payments are there to cover a drop in revenue upon relegation. We went from income around the 105m mark to about 18m. Parachute payments would bump that up to around 60m leaving a 45m per year black hole.
James and McBurnie were sold but sales are amortised, meaning thy payments are spread across a period of time, meaning you dont get 35m up front. So far we have probably had a third of both fees - 12m lets say. Leaving a 33m black hole. This was reduced further by getting rid of salaries etc for the likes of Fer, J Ayew, Narsingh, Bony and Olsson which all in all (including some others) we expected trimmed another 24m of the salary bill. We also added about 1m worth of players in transfer fees, signing on fees and agents fees leaving a 10m loss roughly for the year. Almost certainly some form of loss and no profit at all.
Parachute payments are reduced by around 8m in the second season, yet we carry the costs over from the season before. Its likely we will need to sell another 1 or 2 before being able to break even (that's with the parachute payments).
Without the parachute payments we will need to restructure further, making cuts to the academy status etc to enable us to live self sufficiently.
Anyone who thinks there is any money to take is living in cloud cuckoo land. To be blunt. Hope that answers your question. :thumbup:
There is nothing he doesn’t know ya know🤷ðŸ¼â€â™‚ï¸ |
Talking of fake jacks... 🙈 | |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:21 - Dec 31 with 1579 views | longlostjack |
They sent two players from DC United to train with us. |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:21 - Dec 31 with 1579 views | sainthelens |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 07:33 - Dec 31 by bennytheblue |
This is where it’s gone according to the fake jack roathie on Annis Site:
It doesn't matter who is asking it really, the answer remains the same.
Parachute payments are there to cover a drop in revenue upon relegation. We went from income around the 105m mark to about 18m. Parachute payments would bump that up to around 60m leaving a 45m per year black hole.
James and McBurnie were sold but sales are amortised, meaning thy payments are spread across a period of time, meaning you dont get 35m up front. So far we have probably had a third of both fees - 12m lets say. Leaving a 33m black hole. This was reduced further by getting rid of salaries etc for the likes of Fer, J Ayew, Narsingh, Bony and Olsson which all in all (including some others) we expected trimmed another 24m of the salary bill. We also added about 1m worth of players in transfer fees, signing on fees and agents fees leaving a 10m loss roughly for the year. Almost certainly some form of loss and no profit at all.
Parachute payments are reduced by around 8m in the second season, yet we carry the costs over from the season before. Its likely we will need to sell another 1 or 2 before being able to break even (that's with the parachute payments).
Without the parachute payments we will need to restructure further, making cuts to the academy status etc to enable us to live self sufficiently.
Anyone who thinks there is any money to take is living in cloud cuckoo land. To be blunt. Hope that answers your question. :thumbup:
There is nothing he doesn’t know ya know🤷ðŸ¼â€â™‚ï¸ |
We are all so grateful for yer input, Christ I feel so much better reading that.
Now why don't you do us a favour....fck off you bunch of classless cvnts and pay Nantes what you owe. |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:26 - Dec 31 with 1567 views | Vincent_Vega |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 23:23 - Dec 30 by Badlands |
Rescued us from the effects of Monk and the failures of the previous owners (which they highlighted as a need to sell).
They actually appear to have turned an amateur project into a professional club.
It is very easy to whine but come up with a realistic alternative.
In period prior to the purchase how many ££ did the previous share holders and current 39% invest in the club? |
lol! I'm sorry but
 |  |
| Boycott Shampoo......Demand Real Poo!!! |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:28 - Dec 31 with 1562 views | monmouth |
They've bought the stadiumneeding urgent maintenance and made us responsible for it rather than having a peppercorn rent.
They've YeeHah'h the 'matchday experience' and given us a fanzone.
They've tried to forcibly move some of us from the seats we've had since the stadium opened, and they've shat on the VPs.
Fantastic owners. What's wrong with Y'all? |  |
| |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:30 - Dec 31 with 1552 views | WarwickHunt |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 00:52 - Dec 31 by theloneranger |
"Rescued us from the effects of Monk" ??? ...
And brought in our saviour ... Bob fvcking Bradley!!
|
Shamefully ousting a thoroughly decent man and excellent coach widely respected in the game.
A disgusting and eventually humiliating episode in the history of our club. |  | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:33 - Dec 31 with 1542 views | WarwickHunt |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 06:45 - Dec 31 by TimTtam |
We have an app |
I read that as “we have a nap” - also known as “watching the first half”. | | | |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:34 - Dec 31 with 1540 views | longlostjack |
| What have the Yanks actually done if anything on 08:30 - Dec 31 by WarwickHunt |
Shamefully ousting a thoroughly decent man and excellent coach widely respected in the game.
A disgusting and eventually humiliating episode in the history of our club. |
This. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
