| For the Stats fans on 18:14 - Nov 17 with 764 views | felixstowe_jack |
Be interesting to see how our points per game, goals per game scored, and goals conceded per game for the corresponding 4 seasons. |  |
|  |
| For the Stats fans on 21:00 - Nov 17 with 742 views | Catullus |
Is this going to turn into a Martin v Cooper statto argument? I do hope not.
The stats this season have improved, the first 6 games weren't great but we mostly understood why and accepted it. The massive improvements seen will hopefully continue and the curve will keep going up.
A good run up until the next window and then hopefully a couple of decent signings and who knows, we may just push for a play off spot next year. | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 16:46 - Nov 18 with 667 views | felixstowe_jack |
Hopefully the improvement will continue. Potter, Copper and Martin all had a shaky start but steadily improved with the team finishing in a higher position over each of the last three seasons including 2 seasons in playoffs, despite selling our better players every year. Hopefully we can reach playoffs again this season. | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 00:06 - Nov 19 with 639 views | Dr_Parnassus |
It’s an extremely poor article, the numbers aren’t even correct.
First figure I looked at:-
They reckon we have had 10.7 shots this season.
Vs Blackburn - 7
Vs Sheff Utd - 8
Vs Stoke - 9
Vs Bristol C - 8
Vs PNE - 5
Vs Hull - 16
Vs Millwall - 12
Vs Luton - 15
Vs Huddersfield - 7
Vs Fulham - 7
Vs Derby - 15
Vs Cardiff - 12
Vs WBA - 9
Vs Brum - 7
Vs Peterborough- 13
Vs Coventry - 9
Vs Bournemouth - 7
Add together and divide by 17
= 9.7
They are either wrong or they are using cup matches against lower league opposition to pad the stats.
Either way that’s incredibly poor analysis. |  |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 00:23 - Nov 19 with 633 views | WalterBoyd |
| For the Stats fans on 00:06 - Nov 19 by Dr_Parnassus |
It’s an extremely poor article, the numbers aren’t even correct.
First figure I looked at:-
They reckon we have had 10.7 shots this season.
Vs Blackburn - 7
Vs Sheff Utd - 8
Vs Stoke - 9
Vs Bristol C - 8
Vs PNE - 5
Vs Hull - 16
Vs Millwall - 12
Vs Luton - 15
Vs Huddersfield - 7
Vs Fulham - 7
Vs Derby - 15
Vs Cardiff - 12
Vs WBA - 9
Vs Brum - 7
Vs Peterborough- 13
Vs Coventry - 9
Vs Bournemouth - 7
Add together and divide by 17
= 9.7
They are either wrong or they are using cup matches against lower league opposition to pad the stats.
Either way that’s incredibly poor analysis. |
That's just awful.
How dare they. If only they knew the hurt that causes us all. Sleepless nights and all that.
If you could raise a complaint on behalf of us all, it would be much appreciated .
Tally ho. | | | |
| For the Stats fans on 00:23 - Nov 19 with 632 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| For the Stats fans on 16:46 - Nov 18 by felixstowe_jack |
Hopefully the improvement will continue. Potter, Copper and Martin all had a shaky start but steadily improved with the team finishing in a higher position over each of the last three seasons including 2 seasons in playoffs, despite selling our better players every year. Hopefully we can reach playoffs again this season. |
Cooper, Potter and Martin all had shaky starts?
Memory playing tricks on you with that one.
Potter first 10 games = WWDDLWDLDW = 16 points (73 points season average)
Cooper first 10 games = WDWWWWLDDW = 21 points (96 points season average)
Martin first 10 games = LDLWLDDDWL = 10 points (46 points season average)
First 10 games under Potter and Cooper were play off/automatic form.
First 10 under Martin was relegation form. | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 00:28 - Nov 19 with 629 views | WalterBoyd |
| For the Stats fans on 00:23 - Nov 19 by Dr_Parnassus |
Cooper, Potter and Martin all had shaky starts?
Memory playing tricks on you with that one.
Potter first 10 games = WWDDLWDLDW = 16 points (73 points season average)
Cooper first 10 games = WDWWWWLDDW = 21 points (96 points season average)
Martin first 10 games = LDLWLDDDWL = 10 points (46 points season average)
First 10 games under Potter and Cooper were play off/automatic form.
First 10 under Martin was relegation form. |
If you discount goals from direct free kicks and penalties I think we would look alot better.
Which team conceded the most in last 10 minutes, I would love to know. | | | |
| For the Stats fans on 00:38 - Nov 19 with 625 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| For the Stats fans on 00:28 - Nov 19 by WalterBoyd |
If you discount goals from direct free kicks and penalties I think we would look alot better.
Which team conceded the most in last 10 minutes, I would love to know. |
Well if you take away any types of goals then of course it would look better. Maybe take away headers too? Left footed goals?
But the new look stats, shaped to erase legitimate goals, won’t be a depiction of reality. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| For the Stats fans on 01:31 - Nov 19 with 617 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| For the Stats fans on 00:23 - Nov 19 by WalterBoyd |
That's just awful.
How dare they. If only they knew the hurt that causes us all. Sleepless nights and all that.
If you could raise a complaint on behalf of us all, it would be much appreciated .
Tally ho. |
You seem to be offended by it not me.
I’m just pointing out it’s wrong or flawed. Either one.
Maybe you should think about growing up. I’m sure someone had that idea recently? | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 20:46 - Nov 19 with 521 views | Catullus |
| For the Stats fans on 00:06 - Nov 19 by Dr_Parnassus |
It’s an extremely poor article, the numbers aren’t even correct.
First figure I looked at:-
They reckon we have had 10.7 shots this season.
Vs Blackburn - 7
Vs Sheff Utd - 8
Vs Stoke - 9
Vs Bristol C - 8
Vs PNE - 5
Vs Hull - 16
Vs Millwall - 12
Vs Luton - 15
Vs Huddersfield - 7
Vs Fulham - 7
Vs Derby - 15
Vs Cardiff - 12
Vs WBA - 9
Vs Brum - 7
Vs Peterborough- 13
Vs Coventry - 9
Vs Bournemouth - 7
Add together and divide by 17
= 9.7
They are either wrong or they are using cup matches against lower league opposition to pad the stats.
Either way that’s incredibly poor analysis. |
Maybe they used every game played, that'd be a complete data set. | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 20:48 - Nov 19 with 518 views | Dr_Winston |
It's obvious to anyone with at least one functioning eye attatched to a brain that we're playing a far more ambitious, open and entertaining style this season.
Don't need stats to confirm that. |  |
| Pain or damage don't end the world. Or despair, or f*cking beatings. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, you got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man... and give some back. |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 23:29 - Nov 19 with 480 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| For the Stats fans on 20:46 - Nov 19 by Catullus |
Maybe they used every game played, that'd be a complete data set. |
A complete comparative data set would be to use the league games as they are against teams equal to the competition we play in.
Hence why I never include cup games in my comparisons. | |
| |
| For the Stats fans on 23:31 - Nov 19 with 479 views | Dr_Parnassus |
| For the Stats fans on 20:48 - Nov 19 by Dr_Winston |
It's obvious to anyone with at least one functioning eye attatched to a brain that we're playing a far more ambitious, open and entertaining style this season.
Don't need stats to confirm that. |
Well you need stats to prove what you are saying is correct. I’m dubious.
You have used a lot of cliche there.
What do you mean by “open”? What do you mean by “ambitious”? And with regards to entertaining, depends what you are entertained by right?
I’m equally as entertained this season as I was last. I love winning games. | |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
