| Wind street 11:37 - Jan 1 with 3583 views | controversial_jack |
Apparently, it was dead last night. Is this a case of pricing the customers out or could there be other reasons? |  | | |  |
| Wind street on 12:07 - Jan 1 with 3510 views | pikeypaul |
Nothing to do with price.
The complex in Mumbles was packed out and they charge far more than the majority of places on or around wind street.
People are more inclined to stay local on NYE these days.
The ridiculous taxi fares do not help I was told the rip off oystercabs were charging £20 for Blackpill to Brynmill but they are always far more expensive than all the other companies. |  |
| |
| Wind street on 12:41 - Jan 1 with 3434 views | controversial_jack |
| Wind street on 12:07 - Jan 1 by pikeypaul |
Nothing to do with price.
The complex in Mumbles was packed out and they charge far more than the majority of places on or around wind street.
People are more inclined to stay local on NYE these days.
The ridiculous taxi fares do not help I was told the rip off oystercabs were charging £20 for Blackpill to Brynmill but they are always far more expensive than all the other companies. |
Wind street is usually the most popular street in Wales.I wonder how other cities did. | | | |
| Wind street on 12:54 - Jan 1 with 3403 views | dickythorpe |
People are bored with it and stay in or local. |  | | |
| Wind street on 13:10 - Jan 1 with 3342 views | MrSwerve |
I really, REALLY feel sorry for the emergency services on NYE. |  |
| |
| Wind street on 13:26 - Jan 1 with 3286 views | Gowerjack |
Drunken young women unwittingly flashing their underwear captured for the perverts who read the mail.
It's not pleasant is it? |  |
| |
| Wind street on 13:28 - Jan 1 with 3271 views | Jackfath |
| Wind street on 13:26 - Jan 1 by Gowerjack |
Drunken young women unwittingly flashing their underwear captured for the perverts who read the mail.
It's not pleasant is it? |
I am offended on your behalf. |  |
| |
| Wind street on 13:29 - Jan 1 with 3274 views | controversial_jack |
| Wind street on 13:26 - Jan 1 by Gowerjack |
Drunken young women unwittingly flashing their underwear captured for the perverts who read the mail.
It's not pleasant is it? |
Young women flashing their underwear not pleasant? | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Wind street on 13:35 - Jan 1 with 3252 views | Gowerjack |
| Wind street on 13:29 - Jan 1 by controversial_jack |
Young women flashing their underwear not pleasant? |
Not if they are so pissed they don't realise no. | |
| |
| Wind street on 13:43 - Jan 1 with 3225 views | JACKMANANDBOY |
I think these pictures say..... stay in. |  |
| |
| Wind street on 16:54 - Jan 2 with 2704 views | controversial_jack |
There are some grumpy miserable old b*stards on this site | | | |
| Wind street on 18:16 - Jan 2 with 2572 views | Lohengrin |
The kid in one of the photos on your link, Fath, one from Newcastle - have you seen the size of the kid’s feet! 
 |  |
| An idea isn't responsible for those who believe in it. |
| |
| Wind street on 18:39 - Jan 2 with 2522 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Wind street on 13:35 - Jan 1 by Gowerjack |
Not if they are so pissed they don't realise no. |
I agree with you. I realise it’s within the law for the papers to do it when people are in public, but I think it’s really horrific that ordinary people can be publicly humiliated in a national paper (term used in the loosest possible sense) in such a way. | | | |
| Wind street on 19:44 - Jan 2 with 2434 views | westwalesed |
| Wind street on 18:39 - Jan 2 by londonlisa2001 |
I agree with you. I realise it’s within the law for the papers to do it when people are in public, but I think it’s really horrific that ordinary people can be publicly humiliated in a national paper (term used in the loosest possible sense) in such a way. |
People humiliate themselves by getting themselves of their own free will into that state in the first place. | |
| |
| Wind street on 20:11 - Jan 2 with 2388 views | dickythorpe |
| Wind street on 19:44 - Jan 2 by westwalesed |
People humiliate themselves by getting themselves of their own free will into that state in the first place. |
Westwalesed, you've answered it, people don't want to be surrounded by those that can't handle drinking, and enjoying themselves nicely and in a civilised way. | | | |
| Wind street on 20:59 - Jan 2 with 2325 views | londonlisa2001 |
| Wind street on 19:44 - Jan 2 by westwalesed |
People humiliate themselves by getting themselves of their own free will into that state in the first place. |
The ones that are in a complete state are one thing. But it’s all too easy for a paper to get a snap at a particular moment when someone who is in a perfectly reasonable condition could look like they are utterly wasted.
Even the ones that are in a state don’t deserve to have that immortalised forever for the ‘enjoyment’ of a bunch of tutting, holier than thou Daily Mail readers. The majority of us have had too much on a New Years’ Eve when we were kids at one time or another. We didn’t have pics published so that our boss could see it, or family. They’ve published pictures of girls just sitting down on a kerb. They’re not creating a fuss, not vomiting, not obviously particularly drunk. The only reason they’re pictured is to make a few pervs happy because they may glimpse their underwear.
The ones that I don’t have time for are those that end up wasting the time of the emergency services. They should be made to pay a contribution for the time they take up. | | | |
| Wind street on 21:12 - Jan 2 with 2312 views | swanforthemoney |
| Wind street on 18:16 - Jan 2 by Lohengrin |
The kid in one of the photos on your link, Fath, one from Newcastle - have you seen the size of the kid’s feet!
|
Is the young lady sitting on the plinth showing a breast ? |  |
| I stand in the North Stand
|
| |
| Wind street on 15:38 - Jan 3 with 1980 views | CountyJim |
Who would have thought it young people out enjoying themselves it's only a recent thing mind
Never happened years ago |  | | |
| Wind street on 14:01 - Jan 7 with 1424 views | westwalesed |
| Wind street on 20:59 - Jan 2 by londonlisa2001 |
The ones that are in a complete state are one thing. But it’s all too easy for a paper to get a snap at a particular moment when someone who is in a perfectly reasonable condition could look like they are utterly wasted.
Even the ones that are in a state don’t deserve to have that immortalised forever for the ‘enjoyment’ of a bunch of tutting, holier than thou Daily Mail readers. The majority of us have had too much on a New Years’ Eve when we were kids at one time or another. We didn’t have pics published so that our boss could see it, or family. They’ve published pictures of girls just sitting down on a kerb. They’re not creating a fuss, not vomiting, not obviously particularly drunk. The only reason they’re pictured is to make a few pervs happy because they may glimpse their underwear.
The ones that I don’t have time for are those that end up wasting the time of the emergency services. They should be made to pay a contribution for the time they take up. |
People who have been unreasonable represented - could they not pursue litigation (in theory I know it would be David and Goliath) for having their character defamed?
And people who don't deserve it - no, they don't deserve it. I agree. They shouldn't be publicly shamed. But they absolutely run the risk of being so by getting themselves absolutely battered in the first place.
Like it or not some people in society do judge others if they behave in a way which is in their mind debauched or degenerate. I would absolutely expect my current employer to have a serious issue with me going out getting hammered and vomiting everywhere when part of my role is about supporting Alcoholics with mental health disorders. Or letching on a a woman when I support sexual abuse survivors. | |
| |
| Wind street on 14:09 - Jan 7 with 1413 views | SPboy |
| Wind street on 15:38 - Jan 3 by CountyJim |
Who would have thought it young people out enjoying themselves it's only a recent thing mind
Never happened years ago |
Some real snowflakes on this thread
Well done Newport - Swans away would be your dream draw now, surely ? |  | | |
| Wind street on 17:09 - Jan 7 with 1344 views | Ebo |
| Wind street on 12:07 - Jan 1 by pikeypaul |
Nothing to do with price.
The complex in Mumbles was packed out and they charge far more than the majority of places on or around wind street.
People are more inclined to stay local on NYE these days.
The ridiculous taxi fares do not help I was told the rip off oystercabs were charging £20 for Blackpill to Brynmill but they are always far more expensive than all the other companies. |
That'll be post brexshit prices too before long. |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
