By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Well Resloven has provided the clarification you requested. As disingenuous as it was also always deliberately misquoting themselves, all it's done is confirm that they did accuse me of bring racist.
Although there's zero evidence that anything I say about them is based on their nationality and i always refer to them as Americans not yanks.
Plus you didn't specify in your original comment anything about my prejudices being towards the Americans. They've promised investment for nearly 2 years. I base my opinions on facts.
You'll get nothing of substance. Last night they stated they did 'nothing of the sort'. So they are in denial. As they are on a variety of other matters.
I did read what was written. My response was sufficiently appropriate. There was nothing at all in previous replies that should have even remotely prompted Resloven to suggest what they did.
And no doubt they'll concoct some other fantasy to try and justify their nonsense but what they said was pretty clear. There is no other way to interpret it.
So are a few deleted posts and a locked thread the extent of the recourse?
Why the secrecy? Did Dalton confirm this was part of a wider campaign to re-engage with the membership and fanbase online? Will other online swans forums be receiving statements? Did the trust initiate contact or was it you? Will there now be ongoing dialogue between this site and the trust? Is this why the latest trust update was made a sticky?
Well you say you didn't read the post so I don't know how you can say that,
but that wasn't even complaint anyway!
To repeat it was Resloven who randomly accused me of being racist telling me to "clear my mind of prejudices against race and creed". Which is objectively accusing me of being racist without any justification.
So to confirm, in the spirit of transparency the only action taken is to delete a few posts and to lock that one thread? Is that the extent of it?
Thing is your penchant for fantasy scenarios took a sinister turn last night, so there's an argument to suggested that they certainly do not deserve to the be heard.
I dread to think what you'll conjure up next in your mind.
- No it doesn't. There is a new share certificate issue now. But conversion isn't happening yet.
- you're not fooling anyone Resloven. You saw 'new share certificate being issued' and immediately got excited assuming this meant conversion was underway. Its not. You got the wrong end of the stick - you were WRONG.
- yes well done for finally admitting it. You added 4+4 and got 9. Woops. You're imagining this obstacle.
- you mean money has been spent knowing a hefty sale is imminent. Which is encouraging. Pity it's taken them this long to learn that. If they'd done similar during the siggy fiasco maybe we wouldn't have been relegated.
- evidently not. Your last post is indeed extremely muddled and bizarre.
"You have repeatedly doubted and asked when the new share issue will go ahead. This means (I think) the conversion of the loan note into shares. £13m investment. The OP says this.
"Gareth Davies presented the club’s latest financial information and confirmed the imminent formal issue of new share certificates to reflect the recent settlement agreement."
This was a very informative piece of work actually. It is happening. INVESTMENT. Sorry to break the news to you."
That is you explicitly linking the new share certificate issue with CLN conversion on this very thread. Even though we know this not to be true. So don't try to pretend you know didn't say it. We see you Resloven. You should know by now you can't get away with this type of thing. You've got the wrong end of the stick spectacularly and doing your best to back out of it. No chance.
- it hasn't happened yet and there's no guarantee it will.
- it hasnt been converted yet (if ever) so the trust remain the only shareholder in 25years to invest in the club.
- another baseless slur. A body that was involved in the club throughout the golden period cannot possibly be in a downward since well before that. I'll repeat. The club has been the club since the trust were sidelined. And have only been deemed irrelevant since the sellouts and Americans set out to do that for their own greed. Yes you were WRONG - the trust weren't invited to the CLN and I'll repeat - they requested the full details and didn't get them. The other shareholding sellouts probably weren't invited either.
- yes the trust's shares (and everyone else's) have decreased in value since Levein et al took control - good point well made.