Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Should Southampton Recall Nathan Tella In January
Monday, 12th Dec 2022 09:32

Whilst Saints have struggled for goals this season netting just 13 in the Premier League, one of their players has scored over half that total whilst out on loan, should Nathan Jones activate the recall option from for Nathan Tella from Burnley in January.

Saints have once again been struggling for goals this season and if there is one hope for the second half of the season, it is that if Nathan Jones can get the team scoring it should not be too long until we are out of trouble.

But whilst we have only scored a meagre 13 goals and only three of our players have scored more than a single goal, Nathan Tella loaned out to Burnley has been if fine form for the Lancashire club and has hit 7 goals in 17 starts plus another 3 off the bench.

This has led to some Saints supporters demanding his return to the club in January when we as his parent club have a recall option in place.

Tella was sent out on loan to give him experience and confidence, there was a good reason that he was sent out to Burnley and the truth is that his form at St Mary's had meant that he was nowhere near being a first choice at the start of this season.

That is not to say he didn't have the talent to succeed both at St Mary's and at Premier League level, he had had some decent games for the club, but the problem was he had never been able to produce that form with anything like the consistency needed.

That was not entirely down to the player himself, whenever he seemed to be able to get a good game or two under his belt he seemed to get injured, last season at Crystal Palace was a case in kind, he was superb that night as Saints came back for a draw, but he missed the next game through contracting Covid and after that fixture a win against West Ham on Boxing day he was on the bench for the draw with Spurs, a return to the side saw two decent performances for Nathan, but then came a groin injury that kept him out for over two months.

The previous season to that saw a similar pattern emerge, he just couldn't seem to get a run of games under his belt.

He had shown he had the talent, but he was continually picking up niggles that saw him missing games.

That was why he went to Burnley and he has shown at Turf Moor that he can play a run of games without getting injured, he has played in all 20 of the games in the Championship since he joined Burnley and scored 7 goals.

But is that enough to cause Saints to recall him, yes his goal to games ratio is good, but the brutal truth is that the Championship is far from being the Premier League, the standard is a lot less and goals easier to come by, look at Adam Armstrong, he got 28 goals for Blackburn in 40 games in the season before Saints signed him and it should be noted that his goals to game ratio at St Mary's is also better than Tella's.

The issue for me with Nathan Tella is just where his best position is, even Burnley themselves are not quite sure, he has played as a left winger, a right winger and attacking midfielder and also a centre forward and that was part of the problem in the past two seasons, is he better as a winger or as a forward.

So the question for Nathan Jones is whether Nathan Tella is better than anything that we already have at St Mary's or indeed anything that we are likely to have if we make some of the rumoured signings in the January window.

It us easy to say recall him, but the club have to take into account the whole picture, it is no use just making the squad bigger just for the sake of it, if he is to come back as a winger, is he better than the likes of Sam Edozie, Stuart Armstrong, Mohamed Elyounoussi, Moussa Djenepo and even Che Adams all of whom have been deployed in wide positions.

Even Sekou Mara who has not had two much chance to shine yet.

I would think that if Saints do press the recall button they will do so later in the Transfer window when they have had a chance to assess where the squad will be by the end of it.

My heart says recall him we need every man with his hands at the pump, but my head says that there is a bigger picture and that it might not be the best move for either player or club, if Tella comes back and things don't work out then it might put back his progress even more, whereas if he stays at Turf Moor and has a decent second half of the season then he might be back here and truly ready to make himself a genuine first choice in the side.

So what is your opinion, give it here and also vote in our online poll using the link below.

https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/southampton/members//polls/2872/should-sa

Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



mattlegod added 10:24 - Dec 12
YES
0

SaintNick added 10:43 - Dec 12
Why ?
0

underweststand added 10:49 - Dec 12
A tempting question. In between injuries Nathan performed well last season and clearly Ralph liked having him in the squad. The loan-out was a good idea and he has shown he's worth his place in a Burnley side who may well be back in the Prem. next season.
Should we take him back ..common sense says yes, but unless he gets game time with us every week, he won't advance his career as well as he is doing at Burnley.

Nathan Jones has likely never seen him play and would have to make the decision as to where he would play him, as he not bound to follow Ralph's regular 4-2-2-2 formation.
Last season I saw Tella as " the new Shane Long ". He has the pace and his goal tally at present is better than anyone else we have on the books.

I think we should take him back, and access his ability in the new Jones set-up, and a make a long term decision in May. If he doesn't progress in the meantime we know he is still well-regarded at Turf Moor, and they would bid for him whether promoted or not.
If he continues to shine, then we gain goalscorer - who is already our player anyway.

Burnley have survived on smaller budgets than ours in the past, and I wonder just how much they might pay for him - if he does return to them. If he is successful, then even a 15 million fee might turn out to be too much for them, and a good sell-on % would be vital from our perspective.
0

stmichael added 10:49 - Dec 12
Is there even a clause to recall him?
0

Jesus_02 added 11:22 - Dec 12
I say no.

He isn't going to have the kind of impact that we want from a new striker. The chances are that we will sign on in Jan because we where actively looking and just didn't get the deals across the line.

Tella is better developing in a Burnly team that is doing well.
1

Ifonly added 11:39 - Dec 12
It's a "no" for me unless all of the following are true:
- NJ wants to play 4-3-3 or 4-2-3-1, which is what would suit NT (unlike 4-4-2 / 4-2-2-2)
- NJ has seen enough of his Burnley performances to be convinced already
- NT really wants a relegation battle and is up for it
- Saints are not signing someone else in the window
0

SonicBoom added 11:47 - Dec 12
I don't understand fans. He wasn't good enough to get in the side. He goes elsewhere at a lower level and does pretty well. That tells me that is his level.
do we think he's suddenly become a PL player because he's scored a few goals for Burnley? What next? You want Rodriguez back ?
2

kenis added 13:36 - Dec 12
No, we should not recall him. The primary purpose to recall would have been if he wasnt happy / wasnt getting game time and if we thought his development would be best served at Saints or elsewhere in the football league. I would suggest he is benefiting from the loan and getting good experience and game time and he should have the chance to stay there until the end of the season.
0

ItchenNorth added 13:39 - Dec 12
Adam Armstrong scored 25 goals in the Championship last time he played at that level.

I don't think we need Tella for a goal solution, as that's debatable at the highest level, but I liked what Tella offered Saints creatively before. I'd get him back for that alone.
1

highfield49 added 15:34 - Dec 12
As has been suggested already any move to bring him back next month probably depends on whether or not we are able to sign a goalscorer in the coming weeks. Maybe you can expand on your "rumoured signings" comment Nick because I don't recall any rumours beyond an ex Bournemouth winger who can't get a game at Newcastle and doesn't score goals either.
1

Block8 added 10:26 - Dec 13
If our intention is to sign a new striker then why disturb his progress, as it is progress and is aided by game time, something he might not get back here. We know how NJ played with Luton and I believe we have goals in us we a less risk averse style of play, we may leak a few too but that is to be seen. There is so much pace in this squad, which unfortunately went largely unused under Ralph!
COYR
1

GRIM added 18:10 - Dec 15
NT is not what we need at the moment.
We need a conventional target man that can score a minimum of 15 goals a season & can hold the ball up.
Another Pelle or Rickie Lambert is ideally what we need but how & where do we get one with limited funds available also who would want to join a club that is likely to get relegated this season.
But if we don't get that type of player at least getting NT back would give us more options up front.
0


You need to login in order to post your comments

Blogs 31 bloggers

Knees-up Mother Brown #22 by wessex_exile

Swansea City Polls

About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Advertising
© FansNetwork 2024