On Saturday I watched our game live on TV which was a bonus. Sunday morning my grandson played for his under11s team against one of the best teams for that age group in Oslo. (Staebaek, who have effectively run an academy for20 years or so). The technical side was superb on a 60m artificial pitch. The coaching, shouting out a name and one word was brilliant. The individual skills and effort was nonstop in a 35 minute each way game and the time whizzed by in one of the best games of football I have seen in quite a while. Probably I am biased, my grandson's team won 5 -1, but it could easily have been 5-4. All youth teams must provide a professional coach start at this age.
If our club is doing as good a job, we will not be lacking from the academy. Anyone on here able to give a state of play for local development?
From The Telegraph (who do proper footy reporting) "It is not easy to call to mind all that many programmes where all three of the experts on display are black; football continues to do plenty for representation on screen."
I know there are mixed views on Taking the Knee, but this is surely a good thing, I didn't even notice at the time.
If Leicester came in with a juicy offer, who could we replace him with? I know Jones from Man U has been mooted on here, but isn't he a crock? Phillips from the Bindippers has also been mentioned, with mixed enthusiasm. Any overseas players? I am nowhere on guessing this one.
I wholeheartedly decry racism in all its forms, but like to get a clear perspective on things. The media and political storm has been based on the actions of a significant minority of deviants. I tend to think that their time would have been better spent directing their messaging at said deviants and making it clear that this is not how the rest of civilised society expects its members to behave.
Over half the recorded incidents were about Taking the Knee, which may well be veiled racism, but at least is an acceptable argument not to involve politics in sport, even if you don't agree with them.
So less than 5% of the abusive posts were overtly racist, which must be a very small proportion of all comment on the games on social media. Still far too much, but surely not worth all the headlines detracting from the achievements of the team?
See, it is not VAR, it is the useless English officials (Stuart Atwell in this case) who cannot use it effectively. Twice it has taken far too long to confirm relatively straightforward offsides. The FA and PL need to address this before the use of VAR seriously affects fans attitude to attending and watching games.
Here we go again. What does everyone think / predict? I reckon we may not get a shot on target, and have virtually no chance of getting more than one goal (deflected). I am notoriously bad at predictions, so am getting the negatives in early before my hopes build up.
The behaviour, is of course, despicable, but trying to police these things means you have to be able to access and control account information. Doing that is tantamount to police state behaviours, and cross border, who actually is responsible for pursuing it, and where?. If famous people restricted their account to know friends and families, the main platform for this kind of abuse is drastically reduced. Of course, vanity will preclude that.
I am not saying they get what they deserve, but they are laying themselves open to this kind of sick abuse.
This may not add up to anything, but on a wet Bank Holiday Monday when I woke up at 5.00am, I had to do something with the time. I was perusing the Transfer Markt website, and made a few comparisons of clubs that have been in the PL a while and had a few struggle this season.
It appears that the site includes returning players who had been loaned out as incomers for definition purposes, and I looked at 20/21, 19/20, 18/19 seasons.I don’t know how reliable the data is.
Southampton: Averaged per season, 17 incomers for a net spend of £23m.
Brighton: Averaged per season, 23 incomers for a net spend of £43m.
Wolves: Averaged per season, 27 incomers for a net spend of £56m.
Crystal Palace: Averaged per season, 11 incomers with a net spend of minus £10m (Wan Bissaka).
Burnley: Averaged per season, 8 incomers for a net spend of £11m.
So what could we conclude? Burnley have a specific model tailored to the manager, keeping it small and focused. Less resource spent on scouting, but more research and better selection to fit the system?
Crystal Palace are probably a special case. They are handily located to be attractive options for London based players from other clubs to get a loan placement. They also bring some of their own through and have a pretty low churn of players. (That may change this window as lots are out of contract).
Wolves try out a lot of players (lots of Portugese in the past as has been highlighted by pundits etc), discarding most and have a chunky but not massive net spend every year.
Brighton also churn a lot of players and spend a fair bit doing so. They have struggled consistently for a few seasons, so whilst they have stayed up, it could go either way.
Southampton don’t churn as much as other clubs, with a more stable squad, and topping up with lads from the academy. Compared to say Brighton over the past 3 years, where results have been broadly comparable, the club save up to £20m pa by scouting younger players into the academy. (No comments about Ben White please, haha).
With a squad of 25, on average you are likely to be having 8 contracts ending each year, either to re sign or replace. Arguably, we have only been seeing one academy product each year really make it into the squad, Tella this year, Smallbone last, not sure how to place Valery in that. The others have been peripheral. So we aren’t really seeing the benefit of the £20m underspend, say £10m. So are we potentially under investing in the squad by £10m each year?
I don’t really know if this makes any sense, but I’d say that we either need to see a better return from the academy, else a bit more spend on transfers in if we aren’t to continue struggling against the relegation risk.
Chelsea were value for money yesterday. Almost in complete control throughout the game, leaving Man City with only one shot on target. And they didn't do that by being defensive or boring. The City formation and tactics may have been a fault, but the talent and creativity they have should have produced better than this lame challenge.
Werner got some stick from the pundits, but the way he pulled Rodri's pants down to open up the defence for Havertz's goal was sheer class.
At it again. It always turned my stomach when the faithful sang "He's one of our own." He's wasted most of his career after a brilliant start, and hasn't succeeded anywhere after QPR. Clearly didn't like being called out for his half hearted approach before being kicked out here.
Last summer, (and before) it felt like Hojberg had been "got at" and we were being short changed on the deal. Now, looking back, I'd say that we haven't really missed Hojberg much and getting KWP for £12m has been a masterful negotiation. He has his flaws (who doesn't) but his ambition and enthusiasm mostly bring much joy to the game.
His decision on approving a tory donor planning that avoided a multi million community contribution was dodgy to say the least.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56966731 This is just incompetent grandstanding. Most churches and crematoria cannot accommodate more than 20-25 people with proper social distancing, so unless there is to be an outside service in a cemetery, the ruling is totally meaningless. In the past, this would probably account for less than 1% of all funerals (except for the romany/traveller community, and the IRA where enforcing rules and laws are off the agenda). - Not racist by the way, just observed fact by hundreds if not thousands of people around the country.