Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Cargiant site 15:45 - Apr 13 with 50111 viewsGaryBannister86

Now up for grabs for a cool £100m apparently. Just saying....

https://cardealermagazine.co.u
[Post edited 13 Apr 15:46]
0
Cargiant site on 15:48 - Apr 13 with 13713 viewsBoston

I read it as cardigan site. Not quite old enough yet though.

Poll: Thank God The Seaons Over.

1
Cargiant site on 15:51 - Apr 13 with 13690 viewswombat

Good luck getting a 100 million for that piece of land esp before the HS2 is built .its was a shit idea when TF wanted it and its even more of a shit idea now , only plus point is being a brown field site it would be fairly easy to get a football stadium approved ,long old trek from the corwn on a match day as well

Poll: which is your favouite foot

0
Cargiant site on 16:02 - Apr 13 with 13624 views7374Ranger

I'm not sure why it was a bad idea then or what the issue is, but imo it might be worth considering given the lack of progress in getting any movement on the LC stadium or any other site in the local area.

What is clear us that QPR cannot really make any real progress whilst at Loftus Rd. The ground is old, cramped and cannot be improved without reducing the capacity.
8
Cargiant site on 16:21 - Apr 13 with 13504 viewsTK1

Fernandes and the board handled it spectacularly badly. But reading back Geoff Warren's quotes in rejecting it in 2014 is pretty laughable now.

“We own the land. We are going to develop it...We are making very good progress with the planning application. I’ve committed £15m to the process."

Yeah, sure you did.

It was just hot air all round, wasn't it? No way is that site worth £100m in its current state, with surrounding area also requiring huge investment before anything is even built. It's not the Olympic park.

https://www.westlondonsport.co
2
Cargiant site on 16:21 - Apr 13 with 13499 viewsSpongeParr

How much were we going to pay years ago?

They wouldn't get £100m for it but must be worth an enquiry if nothing else looks like it's coming up.
1
Cargiant site on 17:10 - Apr 13 with 13267 viewsPunteR

Nah. I've changed my tune. Stay at Loftus Road.
I'm done with all that now. And digging down.
We've been promoted twice to the prem in this stadium. We just need to be a better run club. A bigger stadium is not going to make us world beaters. We'll have all the same issues but with more leg room.
I like where we are.

Occasional providers of half decent House music.

22
Cargiant site on 18:02 - Apr 13 with 13105 viewsqueensparker

Cargiant site on 17:10 - Apr 13 by PunteR

Nah. I've changed my tune. Stay at Loftus Road.
I'm done with all that now. And digging down.
We've been promoted twice to the prem in this stadium. We just need to be a better run club. A bigger stadium is not going to make us world beaters. We'll have all the same issues but with more leg room.
I like where we are.


Bournemouth stadium is tiny and they seem to do all right

I agree, I love Loftus Road and the whole experience and I’d rather we made the most of it than chased a soulless retail park dream in a shitty part of west London
4
Cargiant site on 18:04 - Apr 13 with 13105 viewsSpongeParr

Cargiant site on 18:02 - Apr 13 by queensparker

Bournemouth stadium is tiny and they seem to do all right

I agree, I love Loftus Road and the whole experience and I’d rather we made the most of it than chased a soulless retail park dream in a shitty part of west London


They are in the process of doubling the size of it. It'll soon be bigger than ours; and size matters!
1
Login to get fewer ads

Cargiant site on 18:46 - Apr 13 with 12940 viewsTK1

Cargiant site on 18:04 - Apr 13 by SpongeParr

They are in the process of doubling the size of it. It'll soon be bigger than ours; and size matters!


Disagree. Size does not matter for clubs like us.

Bournemouth are going from 11.2k to 20k.

QPR's capacity is 18.5k.

Brentford's capacity is 17.2k

The difference in capacities here make very little material difference, though the facilities at LR are miles behind. Worth knocking the place down and moving to a brownfield three miles north? I don't think so, but it'd be years away anyway.

It's how the club trades and is run that matters.

See Leicester City (capacity 32k), Sheffield W (capacity 34k), Reading (24k), Huddersfield (24k), Barnsley (23k), etc.

Size does not really matter for clubs like ours. It's what you do with it.
4
Cargiant site on 18:47 - Apr 13 with 12911 viewsstevec

Cargiant site on 17:10 - Apr 13 by PunteR

Nah. I've changed my tune. Stay at Loftus Road.
I'm done with all that now. And digging down.
We've been promoted twice to the prem in this stadium. We just need to be a better run club. A bigger stadium is not going to make us world beaters. We'll have all the same issues but with more leg room.
I like where we are.


Did I hear more leg room?

🍻 🥳 🎉
5
Cargiant site on 19:20 - Apr 13 with 12795 viewsDWQPR

Cargiant site on 18:02 - Apr 13 by queensparker

Bournemouth stadium is tiny and they seem to do all right

I agree, I love Loftus Road and the whole experience and I’d rather we made the most of it than chased a soulless retail park dream in a shitty part of west London


It’s quite possible that Bournemouth and Brentford make more use of their grounds outside of matchdays then we do given that they are newer grounds. That seems to be the main issue with Loftus Road in that it is used for 23 days of the year and being old stands are much more costly to run.

Poll: Where will Clive put QPR in his new season preview

2
Cargiant site on 19:22 - Apr 13 with 12786 viewsLogman

Cargiant site on 15:51 - Apr 13 by wombat

Good luck getting a 100 million for that piece of land esp before the HS2 is built .its was a shit idea when TF wanted it and its even more of a shit idea now , only plus point is being a brown field site it would be fairly easy to get a football stadium approved ,long old trek from the corwn on a match day as well


Agreed. With having to provide 30% affordable housing and the Economy versus House Prices starting to resemble a QPR scoreline against Southampton, Cov or Middlesborough they have well and truly missed the boat. Shouldn't have been so greedy way back when.
1
Cargiant site on 19:26 - Apr 13 with 12774 viewsHammersmithR

Cargiant site on 19:20 - Apr 13 by DWQPR

It’s quite possible that Bournemouth and Brentford make more use of their grounds outside of matchdays then we do given that they are newer grounds. That seems to be the main issue with Loftus Road in that it is used for 23 days of the year and being old stands are much more costly to run.


If we stay at Loftus Rd we will never move forward as a club. As we have talked to death on this forum. We are the only club in the top 2 divisions to have not moved grounds or done any serious redevelopment on their ground in over 30 years. That’s why we have watched Brentford and Fulham go past us in recent years to become established Premier League sides. We know all the reasons why Loftus Rd can’t be redeveloped. This site if something can be agreed would be fantastic as it keeps us in the borough. We could build a stadium how we want it to be. It would be benefit from all the transport at Old Oak. It’s a win / win for everyone. If Nourry and the board got this done, then Nourry can have the freedom of the White City. I loved Loftus Rd as much as everyone else, but to move forward as a club we have to move. I’ve sat in the same seat in the Loft since it was rebuilt back in the 80s and literally nothing has changed in my ‘match day’ experience. Take the memories with us to a new ground and create new ones.
14
Cargiant site on 20:17 - Apr 13 with 12635 viewsderbyhoop

If there's any chance at all, at that price, we have to go for it. Of course, size matters - even in the Championship. LR's capacity means maximum revenue from gate receipts would be around £10m. Somebody with access to the latest accounts can put me right, but I don't think I'll be far out. 12-13,000 ST holders at £400 per year (average) + 10,000 more at £25 per match boosts that figure by over £1m. More importantly, a new stadium, next to HS2 stop should allow huge improvement in commercial revenue. In addition, a newer ground should not require the same level of maintenance.
The likes of Brentford and Bournemouth feast on the PL trough, which vastly outweighs gate revenue.
I read an article that stated North Battersea are uncompetitive with the bigger clubs, with bigger capacities, as their ground only holds 41,000 compared to Spurs, Arsenal, Liverpool and the 2 Manchester clubs.

"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness, and many of our people need it sorely on these accounts. Broad, wholesome, charitable views of men and things cannot be acquired by vegetating in one little corner of the Earth all one's lifetime." (Mark Twain) Find me on twitter @derbyhoop and now on Bluesky

4
Cargiant site on 20:48 - Apr 13 with 12549 viewsLblock

Cargiant site on 17:10 - Apr 13 by PunteR

Nah. I've changed my tune. Stay at Loftus Road.
I'm done with all that now. And digging down.
We've been promoted twice to the prem in this stadium. We just need to be a better run club. A bigger stadium is not going to make us world beaters. We'll have all the same issues but with more leg room.
I like where we are.


I've had cause to walk past the Legoland Stadium a number of times recently.

Bentford rankle me as they are on my doorstep.

Sometimes I laugh at how "small time" they went with that stadium.
However, most of the time I think, "that's a 17.5k seater stadium with minimal corporate areas, not a lot else outside matchday and it's in souless area but brilliantly located.... yet again they are making it a success. Bstards!"

I know they leveraged the ground with loads of shite flats around it, the land was cheap due to contamination etc, etc, etc.
It does show though, that a 35k seater bowl is not the answer to your prayers.

I'm with you - Loftus Road forever and concentrate on the stuff that actually makes you a decent football club - the football players and staff.

Cherish and enjoy life.... this ain't no dress rehearsal

5
Cargiant site on 21:07 - Apr 13 with 12455 viewsHAYESBOY

What do we love about Loftus Rd? The enclosed ground that is tight to the pitch that can generate a great atmosphere. The facilities other than that are cramped and outdated.
If we want to compete and be a better run club, then a new stadium has to be our goal.
If this is doable and the owners are still willing, we should go for it. Try and recreate as best we can a tight ground close to the pitch with IMO 25k approx capacity with scope to enlarge.
The difference then being a modern spacious ground with facilities to generate income outside of football.

Smells like a trout farm in here

3
Cargiant site on 21:12 - Apr 13 with 12453 viewsWokingR

Looking at the size of that site though, even 1/3 of it is far bigger than we would need, so a £30m bid has got to be well worth an offer
[Post edited 14 Apr 7:19]
1
Cargiant site on 21:27 - Apr 13 with 12396 viewsLowerloftLad

What about buying part of the land building a bigger matthew tizzard school. Then we could require the land behind the school end?.

Ohhhhhh bobby zamora

1
Cargiant site on 21:39 - Apr 13 with 12348 viewsQPR_Jim

Cargiant site on 21:12 - Apr 13 by WokingR

Looking at the size of that site though, even 1/3 of it is far bigger than we would need, so a £30m bid has got to be well worth an offer
[Post edited 14 Apr 7:19]


The owners have shown before that they're up for a bit of a project, so hopefully they take a look. Like you say, the site is massive we could fit a ground on the part north of the trainlines and develop the lower part on the canal into a mixed use area. When the area was previously looked at for development there was the suggestion of a new overground station and a pedestrian bridge to Old Oak Common. Would be well connected back to Shepherd's Bush if they did that but unlike to make the money back on the stadium fully from the development. Only benefit would be to make the club sustainable and stop them from throwing £2m down the drain each month.
1
Cargiant site on 21:54 - Apr 13 with 12269 viewsdmm

Cargiant site on 21:27 - Apr 13 by LowerloftLad

What about buying part of the land building a bigger matthew tizzard school. Then we could require the land behind the school end?.


Next to the Tizzard school site is Imre Close with a dozen or so private houses that take up about a third of the area behind the school end. Acquiring the school site would not provide enough space to extend the ground.
0
Cargiant site on 22:19 - Apr 13 with 12160 viewskensalriser


Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

2
Cargiant site on 22:25 - Apr 13 with 12115 viewsHayesender

Am I imagining this, but didn't the QPR owners buy up a load of houses round there?

Poll: Shamima Beghum

2
Cargiant site on 22:36 - Apr 13 with 12100 viewsGeoff78

Cargiant site on 19:26 - Apr 13 by HammersmithR

If we stay at Loftus Rd we will never move forward as a club. As we have talked to death on this forum. We are the only club in the top 2 divisions to have not moved grounds or done any serious redevelopment on their ground in over 30 years. That’s why we have watched Brentford and Fulham go past us in recent years to become established Premier League sides. We know all the reasons why Loftus Rd can’t be redeveloped. This site if something can be agreed would be fantastic as it keeps us in the borough. We could build a stadium how we want it to be. It would be benefit from all the transport at Old Oak. It’s a win / win for everyone. If Nourry and the board got this done, then Nourry can have the freedom of the White City. I loved Loftus Rd as much as everyone else, but to move forward as a club we have to move. I’ve sat in the same seat in the Loft since it was rebuilt back in the 80s and literally nothing has changed in my ‘match day’ experience. Take the memories with us to a new ground and create new ones.


Agree we should consider this.

Love Loftus Road but my knees don't. Transport links would be a big plus.
1
Cargiant site on 22:43 - Apr 13 with 12080 viewswombat

Cargiant site on 21:54 - Apr 13 by dmm

Next to the Tizzard school site is Imre Close with a dozen or so private houses that take up about a third of the area behind the school end. Acquiring the school site would not provide enough space to extend the ground.


With clever design it would help us increase capacity same for south Africa road being made deeper add say 2k to the school end and same for South Africa road we are in the early 20 capacity wise . What I don’t know is if the club still have a restrictive covenant on it for the Amount of times it can be used each calendar year ,they used to have back in the day . The jack tizzard school being moved to the TA centra at the end of South Africa road could just about work in my opinion.

The club had the chance to buy the perfect bit of land for the same money as Car giant wanted to they didn’t bother going for it , prefect rail links multiplex neat door , no planning issues if heiniekn made perfect pieces of land dairy crest was it . Car giant as and still is a awful choice for a ground esp a multituse stadium hoping to have gigs boxing football on it.habing hs2 next to it won’t benefit the club it never would have done

Poll: which is your favouite foot

0
Cargiant site on 23:00 - Apr 13 with 12044 viewsNorthLondonR

Dig down, fck off carlsberg, get some decent beer on tap amd we'll be European Champions in 5 years. Simple, innit?
0
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026