| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 19:26 - Aug 19 with 23038 views | boromat |
 |  |
|  |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 20:10 - Aug 19 with 22920 views | mikehunt |
This is brilliant. Thank you so much for your time and effort. |  |
| The worm of time turns not for the cuckoo of circumstance. |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 14:35 - Aug 21 with 21384 views | DaleiLama |
Don't you just love a happy ending? |  |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 14:45 - Aug 21 with 21364 views | judd |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 14:35 - Aug 21 by DaleiLama |
Don't you just love a happy ending? |
It does appear to be set up nicely |  |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:51 - Aug 21 with 21114 views | griff |
Bloody brilliant. Just saying. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:17 - Aug 23 with 20374 views | UpTheDaleNotForSale |
Updated back to April - interesting to note the figure of £6 a share being bandied about even then... |  |
| Twitter : @DaleNotForSale
Facebook : facebook.com/upthedalenotforsale |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:28 - Sep 1 with 19106 views | leedsdale |
Dale Trust are being interviewed on the Price of Football podcast being released tomorrow - all good publicity |  | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:40 - Sep 1 with 19078 views | electricblue |
Reading the latest trust news letter about Curran and Rose and their supposed 40% ownership...
If they have actually paid certain parties where is the proof!.
If the share transfer papers havent been handed to the club then surely Curran and Rose own sod all...
Do the trust and the board know who as agreed to sell and have they contacted these parties asking about if they did sell their percentage and recieved any monies.
We know the yanks bought from Dunphy not long ago... |  |
| My all time favourite Dale player Mr Lyndon Symmonds |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 19:20 - Sep 1 with 19030 views | UpTheDaleNotForSale |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:40 - Sep 1 by electricblue |
Reading the latest trust news letter about Curran and Rose and their supposed 40% ownership...
If they have actually paid certain parties where is the proof!.
If the share transfer papers havent been handed to the club then surely Curran and Rose own sod all...
Do the trust and the board know who as agreed to sell and have they contacted these parties asking about if they did sell their percentage and recieved any monies.
We know the yanks bought from Dunphy not long ago... |
this is where the complexity lies... technically we believe the sale has been completed financially (sellers have either received all the money, or some of it with some being sent from Gateleys after an agreed period of time), although the shares haven't transferred in the actual business.
so there are a lot of people working in the background to see where we go from here - we think the EFL would have to formally approve the share transfer before Dale signed anything or we could be in the deep doo doo... hopefully there is a way that the shares can be bought from #AndyCurran and #DarrellRose of #MortonHouse by the right people, and then there would be a legal way of the share transfer happening from original sellers to new buyers without Curran and Rose ever being formally listed within the club. the challenge is the price they paid - would they sell at a loss to try and show good faith, and then maybe recoup some money from Jarvis or the sellers if they had watertight get out clauses?..
knowing which authorities are looking into this, if we were the sellers we would be very wary of doing ANYTHING with that money until we knew exactly where it had come from... there have been plenty of references to the proceeds of crime act and also source of funding (this is what the SRA are looking into Gateleys for allegedly).
the Trust would be better placed to answer the final question... we would be amazed if they haven't contacted the sellers - if the sellers replied or engaged at all is another question entirely. if they were real fans of the club, or proud of family legacies, you would expect they would at least have the courtesy to reply. [Post edited 1 Sep 2021 19:21]
| |
| Twitter : @DaleNotForSale
Facebook : facebook.com/upthedalenotforsale |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 20:26 - Sep 1 with 18981 views | EllDale |
I would suggest that the events of the last three months demonstrate that the sellers of the shares fall into neither category. | | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 09:30 - Sep 2 with 18770 views | leedsdale |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:28 - Sep 1 by leedsdale |
Dale Trust are being interviewed on the Price of Football podcast being released tomorrow - all good publicity |
An excellent interview Col - well done! 👠| | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 09:04 - Sep 5 with 18167 views | wozzrafc |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 20:26 - Sep 1 by EllDale |
I would suggest that the events of the last three months demonstrate that the sellers of the shares fall into neither category. |
Agreed
The yanks were never dale fans, the may have added ‘up the dale’ to their statements when they wanted to delude dale fans they had a genuine interest for the club. But we were nothing more to a means to their ends, and when they saw that couldn’t be achieved they decided to cut their losses regardless of the consequences.
Andrew kilpatrick wanted to play chairman but couldn’t be arsed to put the effort required or the finances when things got tight. He let bottemely have free reign and when personal circumstances got in the way he cut and run, taking the opportunity to make a profit in the process. Did he suspect what impact this would have on the club? Well if he did he probably didn’t give a shit. He took the post as custodian of the club and then neglected his duties…. Both in bottemleys reign and offloading his shares.
As for Rawlingson he probably allowed to be taken along with bottemley’s plan thinking he could get his place back. Was he nieve? well as supposedly a successful businessman then you would think he may have suspected the consequences. I think he just stuck two fingers up.
Then bottemley well his role has been well documented by others. His was a premeditated attack, brought on for self interests and nothing else. Vindictive, and bourne out of some twisted act of revenge. Whether he ultimately wanted the demise of the club, who knows….. he just saw it as collateral damage. | | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 11:26 - Sep 17 with 16874 views | leedsdale |
Seems like Morton House want to sell to Matt Southall, former chairman of Charlton.
Looking at the comments he makes Jarvis and Curran look like angels [Post edited 17 Sep 2021 11:28]
| | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 07:38 - Sep 18 with 16344 views | FloopyFlips |
Rochdale fans dont trust a word southall says he nearly bankrupted my club charlton overnight and we had get police in kick him out of the club if u dont act now get him out u will have no club | | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 08:01 - Sep 18 with 16325 views | FloopyFlips |
Southall has about £12k in assetts he will buy loads of range rovers a luxury flat and wouldnt give a crap about your club u need do all u can get southall out of your club | | | |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 16:09 - Sep 29 with 14835 views | SuddenLad |
Approached by 'an intermediary'. I bet he slithered up to Southall with a forked tongue flapping in the breeze.
Whoever it was, is no friend of Rochdale AFC. |  |
| “It is easier to fool people, than to convince them that they have been fooled†|
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 16:17 - Sep 29 with 14833 views | joecooke |
The very same i would imagine |  |
| |
| The Hostile Takeover Thread on 18:44 - Sep 29 with 14708 views | NorthernDale |
Southall is a 100% shyster, he left Charlton with debts of £1.8 million, he according the the fans, seem to use Charlton as his personally piggy bank to fund his lifestyle and I am not surprised the judge found against him, as Charlton fans pointed out in a clip, he has a history of being less then honest with the truth. He apparently did it without telling the other directors what he was doing with Charltons money, as well and seemed to bill them for anything he could.
Why do many of these doggy characters seem to live in Dubai? according to the MEN article, he resides in Dubai, the former owner of Macclesfield , who destroyed the club by taking out vast amounts of money to support his lifestyle apparently resides there, as I believe does the owner of Oldham. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
) keep creating them in new threads and then they can be linked from here too... it keeps the internet footprint of our new investor friends nice and big. 
